World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Todd F. Heatherton

Todd F. Heatherton

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
102
Citations
68264
World Ranking
558
National Ranking
350

Todd F. Heatherton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd F. Heatherton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Todd F. Heatherton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd F. Heatherton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Todd F. Heatherton is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. The academic profile includes recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 2012.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work currently available for this researcher.

This profile reflects the publicly accessible data on Todd F. Heatherton's academic and research career without subjective commentary or unverifiable details.

Best Publications

  • The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

    Todd F. Heatherton;Lynn T. Kozlowski;Richard C. Frecker;Karl-Olov Fagerstrom

  • Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation

    Roy F. Baumeister;Todd F. Heatherton;Dianne M. Tice

  • Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview

    Roy F. Baumeister;Todd F. Heatherton

  • Binge eating as escape from self-awareness.

    Todd F. Heatherton;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.

    Todd F. Heatherton;Janet Polivy

  • Guilt: An interpersonal approach.

    Roy F. Baumeister;Arlene M. Stillwell;Todd F. Heatherton

  • A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem

    Richard P. Bagozzi;Todd F. Heatherton

  • Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study

    W. M. Kelley;C. N. Macrae;C. L. Wyland;S. Caglar

  • Measuring the Heaviness of Smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day

    Todd F. Heatherton;Lynn T. Kozlowski;Richard C. Frecker;William Rickert

  • Self-Regulatory Failure: A Resource-Depletion Approach

    Kathleen D. Vohs;Todd F. Heatherton

  • Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure

    Todd F. Heatherton;Dylan D. Wagner

  • When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: negative consequences of high self-esteem.

    Roy F. Baumeister;Todd F. Heatherton;Dianne M. Tice

  • Nicotine addiction and its assessment.

    K O Fagerstrom;T F Heatherton;L T Kozlowski

  • Medial Prefrontal Activity Predicts Memory for Self

    C. Neil Macrae;Joseph M. Moran;Todd F. Heatherton;Jane F. Banfield

  • An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function

    Jennifer A Richeson;Abigail A Baird;Heather L Gordon;Todd F Heatherton

  • Assessing self-esteem.

    Todd F. Heatherton;Carrie L. Wyland

  • Neuroanatomical Evidence for Distinct Cognitive and Affective Components of Self

    J. M. Moran;C. N. MacRae;T. F. Heatherton;C. L. Wyland

  • Effect of viewing smoking in movies on adolescent smoking initiation: a cohort study

    Madeline A Dalton;James D Sargent;Michael L Beach;Linda Titus-Ernstoff

  • Effects of physical threat and ego threat on eating behavior.

    T F Heatherton;C P Herman;J Polivy

  • Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependence: FTQ, FTND, and HSI

    Lynn T. Kozlowski;Carol Q. Porter;C.Tracy Orleans;Marilyn A. Pope

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Kelley
William M. Kelley Dartmouth College
James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
Kathleen D. Vohs
Kathleen D. Vohs University of Minnesota
Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Pamela K. Keel
Pamela K. Keel Florida State University
Janet Polivy
Janet Polivy University of Toronto
C. Neil Macrae
C. Neil Macrae University of Aberdeen
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
C. Peter Herman
C. Peter Herman University of Toronto
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of fulfilling career paths. Many students consider becoming social workers, counselors, or therapists. Online degrees are especially popular as they offer flexible options for busy learners balancing other commitments.

Social work is a common career choice for psychology graduates. If you’re interested in this path, it’s important to understand the specific state requirements. For example, those looking into how to become a social worker in Connecticut need to be aware of local licensing and education rules. Each state’s guidelines can differ significantly, as seen in the Delaware social work education requirements.

Online psychology and social work programs prepare you for real-world roles, blending theoretical knowledge with field experience. If you plan to practice in the South, research how to become a social worker in Florida or review advice on how to become a social worker in Georgia. Understanding regional requirements is key to starting your career with confidence and success.

Best Scientists Citing Todd F. Heatherton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles