World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7217
World Ranking
9109
National Ranking
4834

Jarret T. Crawford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jarret T. Crawford sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jarret T. Crawford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jarret T. Crawford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jarret T. Crawford is affiliated with the College of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a concentration in social psychology and sociology and political science. The work also touches on cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

Their main research topics include cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, aging and gerontology research, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, and optimism, hope, and well-being.

Crawford has published in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include Psychological Inquiry, Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade), Collabra Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology, and Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Crawford include:

  • Perceptions of Aging Across 26 Cultures and Their Culture-Level Associates (2021), Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade)
  • Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement (2022), Collabra Psychology
  • Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries (2020), European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Ideological Conflict and Prejudice: An Adversarial Collaboration Examining Correlates and Ideological (A)Symmetries (2020), Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability? (2020), Perspectives on Psychological Science

Jarret T. Crawford collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Mark J. Brandt, John Ruscio, Corinna E. Löckenhoff, Filip De Fruyt, and Antonio Terracciano. These collaborative efforts highlight interdisciplinary connections across social psychology, political science, and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Political diversity will improve social psychological science.

    José L. Duarte;Jarret T. Crawford;Charlotta Stern;Jonathan Haidt

  • The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

    Mark J. Brandt;Christine Reyna;John R. Chambers;Jarret T. Crawford

  • It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.

    Jarret T. Crawford;José L. Duarte;Jonathan Haidt;Lee Jussim

  • Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Filip de Fruyt;Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. Mccrae

  • Political Intolerance, Right and Left

    Jarret T. Crawford;Jane M. Pilanski

  • Stereotype (In)Accuracy in Perceptions of Groups and Individuals

    Lee Jussim;Jarret T. Crawford;Rachel S. Rubinstein

  • The Unbearable Accuracy of Stereotypes

    Lee Jussim;Thomas R. Cain;Jarret T. Crawford;Kent Harber

  • The emergence of sex differences in personality traits in early adolescence: A cross-sectional, cross-cultural study.

    Marleen De Bolle;Filip De Fruyt;Robert R McCrae;Corinna E Löckenhoff

  • Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups

    Jarret T. Crawford

  • Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: universal and accurate?

    Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt;Lee Jussim

  • The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right

    Jarret T. Crawford

  • Gender Stereotypes of Personality Universal and Accurate

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Balazs Aczel;Barnabas Szaszi;Alexandra Sarafoglou;Zoltan Kekecs

  • Are Conservatives More Sensitive to Threat than Liberals? It Depends on How We Define Threat and Conservatism

    Jarret T. Crawford

  • Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive.

    Jarret T Crawford;Mark J Brandt;Yoel Inbar;John R Chambers

  • Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement

    Richard Anthony Klein;Corey L. Cook;Charles R. Ebersole;Christine Anne Vitiello

  • Bounded openness: The effect of openness to experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality.

    Mark J. Brandt;John R. Chambers;Jarret T. Crawford;Geoffrey Wetherell

  • Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality

    Jarret T. Crawford;Yoel Inbar;Victoria Maloney

  • Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology

    Lee Jussim;Jarret T. Crawford;Stephanie M. Anglin;Sean T. Stevens

  • Bleeding-Heart Liberals and Hard-Hearted Conservatives: Subtle Political Dehumanization Through Differential Attributions of Human Nature and Human Uniqueness Traits

    Jarret T. Crawford;Sean A. Modri;Matt Motyl

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Brandt
Mark J. Brandt Michigan State University
Lee Jussim
Lee Jussim Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jüri Allik
Jüri Allik University of Tartu
Antonio Terracciano
Antonio Terracciano Florida State University
Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Filip De Fruyt
Filip De Fruyt Ghent University
Paul T. Costa
Paul T. Costa Duke University
Corinna E. Löckenhoff
Corinna E. Löckenhoff Cornell University
Michelle Yik
Michelle Yik Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Robert R. McCrae
Robert R. McCrae Independent Scientist / Consultant, US

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a wide range of flexible educational and career opportunities. Many top universities now offer online programs, making it easier for students to balance their studies with work or family responsibilities. For those interested in pursuing undergraduate degrees, the best online psychology program rankings in California and the best online psychology program rankings in Illinois provide valuable insights into high-quality options in key states.

Students seeking advanced credentials should consider doctoral programs, as these open doors to clinical practice, research, or academic careers. The best online psychology doctorate program rankings in USA highlight leading institutions known for rigorous training and real-world preparations. In the Northeast, the best online psychology program rankings in Massachusetts can help you identify top choices for both undergraduate and graduate study.

Graduates of online psychology degrees can pursue varied career pathways, such as clinical or counseling roles, human resources, or research positions. The versatility of psychology studies, combined with online learning’s convenience, means there are more routes than ever toward a rewarding career in this meaningful field.

Best Scientists Citing Jarret T. Crawford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles