World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
8567
World Ranking
6934
National Ranking
410

Jane Shakespeare-Finch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Shakespeare-Finch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane Shakespeare-Finch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Shakespeare-Finch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Shakespeare-Finch is affiliated with Queensland University of Technology in Australia and specializes in psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their work encompasses multiple subfields, including general health professions, social psychology, sociology and political science, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The primary topics of Shakespeare-Finch's research include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Disaster Response and Management

Their publication record features a substantial number of papers in prominent venues such as:

  • Journal of Loss and Trauma
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Family Relations
  • Criminal Justice and Behavior

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Shakespeare-Finch include:

  • "Perceptions of Aging Across 26 Cultures and Their Culture-Level Associates," 2021, Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade)
  • "Posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across ten countries: Global validation of the PTG-PTD theoretical model," 2020, Personality and Individual Differences
  • "COVID-19: An Australian Perspective," 2020, Journal of Loss and Trauma
  • "A Systematic Review of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Studies in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Posttraumatic Growth, and Resilience," 2020, Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • "DNA methylation of NR3C1 and FKBP5 is associated with posttraumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic growth, and resilience," 2020, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Shakespeare-Finch frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Dagmar Bruenig
  • Olivia Miller
  • Georgina David
  • A J Glazebrook
  • David Crompton

Their research contributions highlight interdisciplinary approaches to understanding trauma, resilience, and mental health across diverse populations and settings. Their work has been cited widely, indicating engagement with an international academic audience.

Best Publications

  • National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures

    A. Terracciano;A. M. Abdel-Khalek;N. Ádám;L. Adamovová

  • A meta-analytic clarification of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and symptoms of posttraumatic distress disorder

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Janine Lurie-Beck

  • Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Filip de Fruyt;Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. Mccrae

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Theory, Research, and Applications

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Kanako Taku;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Multidimensional nature of posttraumatic growth in an Australian population.

    Bronwyn A. Morris;Jane E. Shakespeare-Finch;Jane E. Shakespeare-Finch;Murray J. Rieck;Jasmin Newbery

  • The development of the 2-Way Social Support Scale: a measure of giving and receiving emotional and instrumental support.

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Patricia L Obst

  • Rumination, post-traumatic growth, and distress: structural equation modelling with cancer survivors

    Bronwyn Anne Morris;Jane Shakespeare-Finch

  • Trauma Type and Posttrauma Outcomes: Differences Between Survivors of Motor Vehicle Accidents, Sexual Assault, and Bereavement

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Deanne Armstrong

  • The emergence of sex differences in personality traits in early adolescence: A cross-sectional, cross-cultural study.

    Marleen De Bolle;Filip De Fruyt;Robert R McCrae;Corinna E Löckenhoff

  • Working with refugee survivors of torture and trauma: An opportunity for vicarious post-traumatic growth

    Allysa J. Barrington;Jane Shakespeare-Finch

  • The Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Growth in Emergency Ambulance Personnel

    Jane E. Shakespeare-Finch;Sandra J. Smith;Kathryn M. Gow;Gary Embelton

  • Predicting post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress in firefighters

    Deanne Armstrong;Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Ian Shochet

  • Corroborating evidence of posttraumatic growth

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Tracey Enders

  • Personality, Coping and Posttraumatic Growth in Emergency Ambulance Personnel

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Kathryn Gow;Sandy Smith

  • Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: universal and accurate?

    Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt;Lee Jussim

  • Adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies predict posttrauma outcomes in ambulance personnel

    Robyn Kirby;Jane E. Shakespeare-Finch;Gavan R. Palk

  • Posttraumatic growth after cancer: the importance of health-related benefits and newfound compassion for others

    Bronwyn Anne Morris;Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Jennifer L. Scott

  • Gender Stereotypes of Personality Universal and Accurate

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt

  • A Grounded Theory Approach to Understanding Cultural Differences in Posttraumatic Growth

    Jane E. Shakespeare-Finch;Alicia Copping

  • Behavioural changes add validity to the construct of posttraumatic growth

    Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Allysa J. Barrington

  • Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates

    Corinna Lockenhoff;Filip De Fruyt;Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. McCrae

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Tedeschi
Richard G. Tedeschi University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Lawrence G. Calhoun
Lawrence G. Calhoun University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ian M. Shochet
Ian M. Shochet Queensland University of Technology
Jüri Allik
Jüri Allik University of Tartu
Antonio Terracciano
Antonio Terracciano Florida State University
Patricia L. Obst
Patricia L. Obst Queensland University of Technology
Michelle Yik
Michelle Yik Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Paul T. Costa
Paul T. Costa Duke University
Corinna E. Löckenhoff
Corinna E. Löckenhoff Cornell University
Robert R. McCrae
Robert R. McCrae Independent Scientist / Consultant, US

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways. One popular route is becoming a speech-language pathologist, which requires specific certification processes depending on the state. For example, those interested in practicing in Oregon need to meet the Oregon speech pathologist certification requirements. Each state has its own regulations that can affect licensure and employment opportunities.

If you're considering working in Pennsylvania, it's crucial to understand the slp requirements in Pennsylvania, which detail necessary education, clinical experience, and examinations. Likewise, aspiring professionals in Rhode Island should review the Rhode Island speech pathologist certification requirements to ensure compliance with local standards.

In South Carolina, the pathway involves additional criteria outlined in the South Carolina speech pathologist certification requirements. With the right online degree and knowledge of state-specific pathways, you can build a rewarding and impactful career in speech-language pathology or related psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Shakespeare-Finch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles