World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14694
World Ranking
4350
National Ranking
2423

Arnie Cann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnie Cann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arnie Cann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnie Cann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnie Cann is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States and specializes in the field of Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research spans key topics related to posttraumatic experiences and trauma, particularly in the areas of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, Migration, Health and Trauma, and Child Abuse and Trauma.

Their recent scholarly contributions include notable papers such as:

  • Posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across ten countries: Global validation of the PTG-PTD theoretical model, 2020, published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • Posttraumatic Growth and Depreciation Inventory--Expanded Version, 2021, published in PsycTESTS Dataset

Cann frequently collaborates with several researchers across their work. Some of the most common co-authors include:

  • Kanako Taku
  • Richard G. Tedeschi
  • Jane Shakespeare-Finch
  • Daniel Krosch
  • Georgina David

The primary publication venues for Cann's research are:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Their research contributions focus on understanding the complexities of trauma and recovery, especially through theoretical and psychometric advancements related to posttraumatic growth and depreciation. This scholarly work reflects an emphasis on cross-cultural perspectives as well as the development and validation of psychological inventories used to assess trauma-related outcomes.

Best Publications

  • A correlational test of the relationship between posttraumatic growth, religion, and cognitive processing.

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi;Jamie McMillan

  • A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kanako Taku

  • Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kelli N. Triplett

  • Posttraumatic Growth, Meaning in Life, and Life Satisfaction in Response to Trauma

    Kelli Nicole Triplett;Richard G. Tedeschi;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Model: Sociocultural Considerations

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SELF‐REPORTED POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Tanya Vishnevsky;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • The factor structure of the posttraumatic growth inventory: A comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis

    Kanako Taku;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth in Psychotherapy

    Debora Arnold;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard Tedeschi;Arnie Cann

  • The Core Beliefs Inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world.

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Ryan P. Kilmer

  • Evaluating Resource Gain: Understanding and Misunderstanding Posttraumatic Growth

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann

  • Positive Outcomes Following Bereavement: Paths to Posttraumatic Growth

    Lawrence G Calhoun;Richard G Tedeschi;Arnie Cann;Emily A Hanks

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: A Revision Integrating Existential and Spiritual Change.

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Arnie Cann;Kanako Taku;Emre Senol-Durak

  • The relationship of core belief challenge, rumination, disclosure, and sociocultural elements to posttraumatic growth.

    Cassie M. Lindstrom;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Examining posttraumatic growth among Japanese university students

    Kanako Taku;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Virginia Gil-Rivas

  • Intrusive versus deliberate rumination in posttraumatic growth across US and Japanese samples.

    Kanako Taku;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic Growth and Depreciation as Independent Experiences and Predictors of Well-Being

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;David T. Solomon

  • The Role of Rumination in the Coexistence of Distress and Posttraumatic Growth Among Bereaved Japanese University Students

    Kanako Taku;Lawrence G Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G Tedeschi

  • Correlates of posttraumatic growth in survivors of intimate partner violence

    Amanda R. Cobb;Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann

  • Attachment styles, conflict styles and humour styles: interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction

    Arnie Cann;M. Ashley Norman;Jennifer L. Welbourne;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior.

    Arnie Cann;William D. Siegfried

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence G. Calhoun
Lawrence G. Calhoun University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Richard G. Tedeschi
Richard G. Tedeschi University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Nicholas A. Kuiper
Nicholas A. Kuiper University of Western Ontario
Charlie L. Reeve
Charlie L. Reeve University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Isabel Leal
Isabel Leal ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Bayard L. Powell
Bayard L. Powell Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a wealth of pathways, from counseling to clinical work and beyond. For many, pursuing an online degree in psychology is a flexible and modern option, allowing learners to balance their studies with other commitments. These programs also prepare students for a variety of roles, including licensed counselors, school psychologists, and mental health advocates.

Navigating licensure requirements varies by state, but there are guides to help you find the fastest route. For example, if you are looking for the fastest way to become a counselor in Missouri or seeking the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Montana, dedicated resources can break down the required steps, from education to supervised training.

Similarly, aspirants can uncover the fastest way to become a counselor in Nebraska or find information on the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Nevada. These resources outline not only degree requirements, but also the necessary exams and application processes. By choosing the right online program and being aware of your state’s guidelines, you can confidently take your first steps toward a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Arnie Cann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles