World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
44218
World Ranking
1913
National Ranking
1122

Lawrence G. Calhoun publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence G. Calhoun sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lawrence G. Calhoun D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence G. Calhoun sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence G. Calhoun is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their work primarily falls within the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and applied psychology. The research topics they cover include posttraumatic stress disorder, migration-related health and trauma issues, child abuse and trauma, as well as optimism, hope, and well-being.

Calhoun has contributed to several notable publications. Among recent papers are the following:

  • Posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across ten countries: Global validation of the PTG-PTD theoretical model, 2020, published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • Posttraumatic Growth and Depreciation Inventory--Expanded Version, 2021, published in PsycTESTS Dataset

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Richard G. Tedeschi
  • Kanako Taku
  • Jane Shakespeare-Finch
  • Daniel Krosch
  • Georgina David

Calhoun's work is regularly published in venues such as Personality and Individual Differences and PsycTESTS Dataset.

They have extensively researched the conceptual and empirical aspects of posttraumatic growth and depreciation, contributing to the understanding of psychological adaptation following trauma. Their research also addresses the intersection of migration, health, and trauma, highlighting broad interests in trauma-related topics and mental health outcomes across diverse populations.

Best Publications

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma.

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Target Article: "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence".

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic growth : positive changes in the aftermath of crisis

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Crystal L. Park;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Trauma and Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • The Foundations of Posttraumatic Growth: An Expanded Framework

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • A correlational test of the relationship between posttraumatic growth, religion, and cognitive processing.

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi;Jamie McMillan

  • Handbook of posttraumatic growth : research and practice

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kanako Taku

  • Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kelli N. Triplett

  • Posttraumatic growth after war: a study with former refugees and displaced people in Sarajevo.

    Steve Powell;Rita Rosner;Willi Butollo;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Posttraumatic Growth, Meaning in Life, and Life Satisfaction in Response to Trauma

    Kelli Nicole Triplett;Richard G. Tedeschi;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Issues

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Crystal L. Park;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Model: Sociocultural Considerations

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SELF‐REPORTED POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Tanya Vishnevsky;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • The factor structure of the posttraumatic growth inventory: A comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis

    Kanako Taku;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth in Psychotherapy

    Debora Arnold;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard Tedeschi;Arnie Cann

  • Facilitating Posttraumatic Growth: A Clinician's Guide

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • The Core Beliefs Inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world.

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Ryan P. Kilmer

  • An Exploratory Study of Posttraumatic Growth in Children Following a Natural Disaster

    Cheryl H. Cryder;Ryan P. Kilmer;Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Tedeschi
Richard G. Tedeschi University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Arnie Cann
Arnie Cann University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Rita Rosner
Rita Rosner Catholic University of America
Charlie L. Reeve
Charlie L. Reeve University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Keith E. Stanovich
Keith E. Stanovich University of Toronto
Steven C. Hayes
Steven C. Hayes University of Nevada Reno
John D. Mayer
John D. Mayer University of New Hampshire
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

In today’s digital era, online psychology degrees offer flexible pathways for those interested in mental health and counseling careers. Many students choose to focus on substance abuse counseling due to its growing importance across the United States. Online programs allow learners to continue working while gaining the skills needed for specialized fields.

Career requirements can vary considerably depending on location. For instance, the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fremont may differ from how to become a substance abuse counselor in Fresno, reflecting differences in local licensing and education guidelines.

Further, each region may have specific training or certification processes. Understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Garland or Gilbert substance abuse counselor certification requirements can help you plan your educational journey more effectively.

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to many rewarding careers while providing flexibility to meet diverse certification and licensure needs nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence G. Calhoun

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles