World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
97
Citations
38533
World Ranking
702
National Ranking
441

Robert A. Neimeyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Neimeyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 482 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert A. Neimeyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Neimeyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Neimeyer is affiliated with the University of Memphis in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of psychology. Their published works focus significantly on grief, bereavement, mental health, and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The scientist's main field of study is Psychology, with subfields including Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science. Their research addresses several key topics:

  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Neimeyer has contributed to numerous publications, with a significant presence in the journal Death Studies, among others. Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Circumstances of the death and associated risk factors for severity and impairment of COVID-19 grief", 2021, Death Studies
  • "Pandemic Grief Scale: A screening tool for dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 loss", 2020, Death Studies
  • "Psychological Risk Factors of Functional Impairment After COVID-19 Deaths", 2021, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • "Risk factors for dysfunctional grief and functional impairment for all causes of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of meaning", 2021, Death Studies
  • "Social isolation and the mitigation of coronavirus anxiety: The mediating role of meaning", 2020, Death Studies

Frequent coauthors in Neimeyer's work are Sherman A. Lee, Lauren J. Breen, Evgenia Milman, Ines Testoni, and Jamison S. Bottomley. These collaborations often concentrate on bereavement and mental health related to the COVID-19 pandemic and broader psychological issues.

Neimeyer's research has been published predominantly in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Death Studies
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • British Journal of Guidance and Counselling
  • PsycTHERAPY Dataset

The breadth of Robert A. Neimeyer's work encompasses clinical and social aspects of psychology, with a detailed focus on how grief and trauma affect mental health, particularly in times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11

    Holly G Prigerson;Holly G Prigerson;Mardi J. Horowitz;Selby C. Jacobs;Colin M. Parkes

  • Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM‐5

    M. Katherine Shear;Naomi Simon;Melanie Wall;Sidney Zisook

  • Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review of controlled outcome research.

    Leslie A. Robinson;Jeffrey S. Berman;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss.

    Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of meaning reconstruction in bereavement.

    James Gillies;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • SEARCHING FOR THE MEANING OF MEANING: GRIEF THERAPY AND THE PROCESS OF RECONSTRUCTION

    Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Continuing Bonds and Reconstructing Meaning: Mitigating Complications in Bereavement.

    Robert A Neimeyer;Scott A Baldwin;James Gillies

  • Sense-making, grief, and the experience of violent loss: toward a mediational model.

    Joseph M. Currier;Jason M. Holland;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • The Effectiveness of Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Bereaved Persons: A Comprehensive Quantitative Review.

    Joseph M. Currier;Robert A. Neimeyer;Jeffrey S. Berman

  • Constructivism in Psychotherapy

    Robert A. Neimeyer;Michael J. Mahoney

  • Mourning and Meaning

    Robert A. Neimeyer;Holly G. Prigerson;Betty Davies

  • Running versus weight lifting in the treatment of depression.

    Elizabeth J. Doyne;Deborah J. Ossip-Klein;Eric D. Bowman;Kent M. Osborn

  • Psychological Research on Death Attitudes: An Overview and Evaluation.

    Robert A. Neimeyer;Joachim Wittkowski;Richard P. Moser

  • Predictors of grief following the death of one's child: the contribution of finding meaning.

    Nancy J. Keesee;Joseph M. Currier;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • An appraisal of constructivist psychotherapies.

    Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Death Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, And Application

    Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Long-term effects of incestuous child abuse in college women: Social adjustment, social cognition, and family characteristics

    Stephanie Harter;Pamela C. Alexander;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Death anxiety in older adults: a quantitative review.

    Barry V. Fortner;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Does grief counseling work

    John R. Jordan;Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Aprender de la pérdida: una guía para afrontar el duelo

    Robert A. Neimeyer

  • Meaning Reconstruction in the First Two Years of Bereavement: The Role of Sense-Making and Benefit-Finding

    Jason M. Holland;Joseph M. Currier;Robert A. Neimeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph M. Currier
Joseph M. Currier University of South Alabama
Jason M. Holland
Jason M. Holland University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Greg J. Neimeyer
Greg J. Neimeyer University of Florida
Holly G. Prigerson
Holly G. Prigerson Cornell University
William R. Shadish
William R. Shadish University of California, Merced
Sherman A. Lee
Sherman A. Lee Christopher Newport University
David W. Kissane
David W. Kissane University of Notre Dame Australia
William Breitbart
William Breitbart Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Cecilia L. W. Chan
Cecilia L. W. Chan University of Hong Kong
Andreas Maercker
Andreas Maercker University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology opens the door to a wide range of careers that offer meaningful opportunities to help others. One popular pathway is substance abuse counseling, a field experiencing strong demand across the USA. Each state and city has different licensure and certification requirements, so prospective counselors should be aware of the specific steps involved.

For example, the Las Vegas substance abuse counselor certification requirements focus on accredited education, supervised training, and passing a state exam. If you are considering a career in Kentucky, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Lexington also requires specific coursework and practical experience.

Similarly, students interested in Nebraska should review the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lincoln. For those in California, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Long Beach emphasizes state-approved education and supervised experience.

Online degrees in psychology can provide the foundational knowledge for these roles, offering flexibility and access to accredited programs that align with career requirements in various regions.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Neimeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles