World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
8881
World Ranking
6376
National Ranking
3069

John W. Peabody publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Peabody sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 159 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John W. Peabody D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Peabody sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Peabody is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their work primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

Their research topics include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment and Management, Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment, Esophageal and GI Pathology, Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes, Medication Adherence and Compliance, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Peabody has been published frequently in several venues, including Diagnostics, Journal of the American Heart Association, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Cancer, and International Urology and Nephrology.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Measuring and Improving Evidence-Based Patient Care Using a Web-Based Gamified Approach in Primary Care (QualityIQ): Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Meeting the challenge of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease in patients with cancer, 2020, Cancer
  • Randomized clinical trial of a novel donor-derived cfDNA test to detect rejection in CPV-simulated renal transplant patients, 2020, International Urology and Nephrology
  • Randomized Trial to Improve Primary Care Patient Management and Patient Outcomes Using a Drug-Drug Interaction Test: Confirmation of the DECART Simulated Patient Clinical Utility Trial Results, 2021, Diagnostics
  • Clinical Utility of a Biomarker to Detect Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury during Percutaneous Cardiovascular Procedures, 2022, Cardiorenal Medicine

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • David Paculdo
  • Czarlota Valdenor
  • Enrico de Belen
  • Trever Burgon
  • Diana Tamondong-Lachica

Best Publications

  • Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A Prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality

    John Peabody;Jeffrey Luck;Peter Glassman;Timothy R. Dresselhaus

  • Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: A prospective validation study

    John W. Peabody;Jeff Luck;Peter Glassman;Sharad Jain

  • Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures.

    Karen B. DeSalvo;William P. Fisher;Ky Tran;Nicole Bloser

  • How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.

    Jeffrey Luck;John Peabody;Timothy R. Dresselhaus;Martin L. Lee;Martin L. Lee

  • Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems.

    John W. Peabody;Jeff Luck;Jeff Luck;Sharad Jain;Dan Bertenthal

  • An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China

    Jonathan E. Sinton;Kirk R. Smith;John W. Peabody;Liu Yaping

  • Health care expenditure prediction with a single item, self-rated health measure

    Karen B. DeSalvo;Tiffany M. Jones;John Peabody;Jay McDonald

  • Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings

    Jeffrey Luck;John Peabody

  • Tobacco control in India

    Riti Shimkhada;John W. Peabody

  • Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record.

    Timothy R. Dresselhaus;John Peabody;Martin L. Lee;Martin L. Lee;Mingming Wang

  • Universal health coverage and intersectoral action for health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition

    Dean T. Jamison;Ala Alwan;Charles N. Mock;Rachel Nugent

  • An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care

    Timothy R. Dresselhaus;John W. Peabody;Jeff Luck;Dan Bertenthal

  • Household CO and PM measured as part of a review of China's National Improved Stove Program.

    R. D. Edwards;Y. Liu;Y. Liu;G. He;Z. Yin

  • Using standardized patients to measure quality: evidence from the literature and a prospective study.

    Unknown

  • Improving the Quality of Care in Developing Countries

    John W. Peabody;Mario M. Taguiwalo;David A. Robalino;Julio Frenk

  • Building psychosocial assets and wellbeing among adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial.

    Katherine Sachs Leventhal;Jane Gillham;Lisa DeMaria;Gracy Andrew

  • Economic reform and health sector policy: lessons from structural adjustment programs.

    Unknown

  • Associations between cognitive function, blood lead concentration, and nutrition among children in the central Philippines.

    Orville Solon;Travis J. Riddell;Travis J. Riddell;Stella A. Quimbo;Elizabeth Butrick

  • Indoor air pollution in rural China: cooking fuels, stoves, and health status.

    John W Peabody;Travis J Riddell;Kirk R Smith;Yaping Liu

  • The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record

    T R Dresselhaus;J Luck;J W Peabody

  • Cardiac risk underestimation in urban, black women.

    Karen B. DeSalvo;Jessica Gregg;Myra Kleinpeter;Bonnie R. Pedersen

  • Financial Incentives And Measurement Improved Physicians’ Quality Of Care In The Philippines

    John Peabody;Riti Shimkhada;Stella Quimbo;Jhiedon Florentino

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirk R. Smith
Kirk R. Smith University of California, Berkeley
Jane E. Gillham
Jane E. Gillham Swarthmore College
Dean T. Jamison
Dean T. Jamison University of California, San Francisco
Vibeke Strand
Vibeke Strand Stanford University
Atul A. Gawande
Atul A. Gawande Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul J. Gertler
Paul J. Gertler University of California, Berkeley
Margaret E. Kruk
Margaret E. Kruk Washington University in St. Louis
Kara Hanson
Kara Hanson London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Rufus Edwards
Rufus Edwards University of California, Irvine
Charles E. McCulloch
Charles E. McCulloch University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a wide range of impactful careers. Many students pursue specialized areas such as counseling, therapy, psychology, or social work by choosing flexible online programs.

Those interested in professional counseling roles often opt for cacrep-accredited online counseling programs. These programs ensure high educational standards and can help graduates meet state licensure requirements. For those passionate about helping families and relationships, choosing reputable online marriage and family therapy masters programs can lead to in-demand roles in therapy and counseling settings.

A bachelor of science in psychology provides a solid foundation for various entry-level positions, as well as a stepping stone to advanced graduate degrees. For those set on social work, there are several online msw programs designed for accessibility, helping students prepare for licensure and diverse roles in community agencies, healthcare, and beyond.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you tailor your education and career pathway in the social sciences, making it easy to study from anywhere while preparing for a meaningful profession.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Peabody

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles