World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
32814
World Ranking
11410
National Ranking
4688

Lawrence D. Jackel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence D. Jackel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lawrence D. Jackel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence D. Jackel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For sustained contributions to the fields of microscience and machine learning by increasing scientific understanding and by developing technology and applying it to systems with commercial and industrial significance
  • 1992 - IEEE Fellow For leadership in the applications of neural networks to pattern recognition and in the development of electronic systems implementing neural networks.

Overview

Lawrence D. Jackel is affiliated with the Toyota Research Institute in the United States. Their research contributions span the fields of microscience and machine learning, with particular emphasis on increasing scientific understanding and the development of technology applied to systems of commercial and industrial significance.

Jackel has been recognized with two major professional distinctions during their career. They were named a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 1997 for sustained contributions to the combined areas of microscience and machine learning. The citation highlighted their role in advancing scientific knowledge and applying this knowledge to real-world technological systems.

Earlier, in 1992, Jackel was honored as an IEEE Fellow. This award was given for leadership in applying neural networks to pattern recognition as well as for developing electronic systems that implement these neural networks. These contributions reflect a focus on both theoretical and practical aspects of neural network technology within electronic hardware frameworks.

The scientist's work integrates interdisciplinary approaches, linking physical sciences with computational methods. Their expertise lies in areas involving neural networks, pattern recognition, and their application to electronic and industrial systems.

Best Publications

  • Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition

    Y. LeCun;B. Boser;J. S. Denker;D. Henderson

  • Handwritten Digit Recognition with a Back-Propagation Network

    Yann LeCun;Bernhard E. Boser;John S. Denker;John S. Denker;Donnie Henderson

  • End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars

    Mariusz Bojarski;Davide Del Testa;Daniel Dworakowski;Bernhard Firner

  • Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwritten digit recognition

    L. Bottou;C. Cortes;C. Cortes;J.S. Denker;J.S. Denker;H. Drucker;H. Drucker

  • Learning algorithms for classification: A comparison on handwritten digit recognition

    Yann Lecun;L.D. Jackel;Leon Bottou;Leon Bottou;Corinna Cortes;Corinna Cortes

  • Comparison of learning algorithms for handwritten digit recognition

    Yann Lecun;L.D. Jackel;Leon Bottou;Leon Bottou;A. Brunot

  • Handwritten digit recognition: applications of neural network chips and automatic learning

    Y. Le Cun;L.D. Jackel;B. Boser;J.S. Denker

  • Large Automatic Learning, Rule Extraction, and Generalization.

    John S. Denker;Daniel B. Schwartz;Ben S. Wittner;Sara A. Solla

  • Boosting and other ensemble methods

    Harris Drucker;Corinna Cortes;L. D. Jackel;Yann LeCun

  • Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Car

    Mariusz Bojarski;Philip Yeres;Anna Choromanska;Krzysztof Choromanski

  • VLSI implementation of a neural network memory with several hundreds of neurons

    H. P. Graf;L. D. Jackel;R. E. Howard;B. Straughn

  • Superconducting junctions utilizing a binary semiconductor barrier

    Evelyn L. Hu;Lawrence D. Jackel

  • VLSI implementation of a neural network model

    Hans P. Graf;Lawrence D. Jackel;Wayne E. Hubbard

  • An analog neural network processor with programmable topology

    B.E. Boser;E. Sackinger;J. Bromley;Y. Le Cun

  • Neural Network Recognizer for Hand-Written Zip Code Digits

    John S. Denker;W. R. Gardner;Hans Peter Graf;Donnie Henderson

  • Application of the ANNA neural network chip to high-speed character recognition

    E. Sackinger;B.E. Boser;J. Bromley;Y. LeCun

  • Learning Curves: Asymptotic Values and Rate of Convergence

    Corinna Cortes;L. D. Jackel;Sara A. Solla;Vladimir Vapnik

  • Image skeletonization method

    John S. Denker;Hans P. Graf;Donnie Henderson;Richard E. Howard

  • Hierarchical constrained automatic learning network for character recognition

    John S. Denker;Richard E. Howard;Lawrence D. Jackel;Yann Lecun

  • Method and apparatus for remotely controlling telephone call-forwarding

    Ronald J. Brachman;Donnie Henderson;Lawrence David Jackel;Frederick Kenneth Schmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Howard
Richard Howard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John S. Denker
John S. Denker Nokia (United States)
Hans Peter Graf
Hans Peter Graf NEC (United States)
Bernhard E. Boser
Bernhard E. Boser University of California, Berkeley
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun Facebook (United States)
Harold G. Craighead
Harold G. Craighead Cornell University
Henry S. Baird
Henry S. Baird Lehigh University
Corinna Cortes
Corinna Cortes Google (United States)
Isabelle Guyon
Isabelle Guyon University of Paris-Saclay
Sara A. Solla
Sara A. Solla Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your study of Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students explore specialized fields such as mechanical engineering, physics, data science, and electrical engineering—each offering online programs tailored for flexible learning.

For those interested in engineering, pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering can enhance your technical skills and lead to careers in automation, robotics, or product design. Similarly, a physics degree online is ideal for students eager to deepen their understanding of theoretical principles and research methods that underpin modern technology.

As the tech industry rapidly evolves, professionals with a data science degree are in high demand across business, healthcare, and research sectors. If you seek expertise in energy systems or electronics, online electrical engineering courses USA offer another strong pathway aligned with Computer Science.

Exploring these online degrees not only broadens your skills but also enhances your career opportunities in technology and engineering fields worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence D. Jackel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles