World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
12219
World Ranking
8707
National Ranking
4635

Jane E. Gillham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane E. Gillham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane E. Gillham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane E. Gillham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane E. Gillham is affiliated with Swarthmore College in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in psychology and health professions. Their work spans clinical psychology, general health professions, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiological and ultrasound technology, and social psychology.

The research topics addressed by Jane E. Gillham include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Community Health and Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Among recent publications by Jane E. Gillham is the 2024 paper titled Psychological interventions to prevent depression: a cause for hope, appearing in The Lancet Psychiatry. Other recent papers authored by frequent coauthors and related research examine human resilience, rumination, and telehealth interventions, published in venues such as Europe's Journal of Psychology, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, and the PsycTESTS Dataset.

Recent papers include:

  • Integrative review of the recent literature on human resilience: From concepts, theories, and discussions towards a complex understanding (2022, Europe's Journal of Psychology)
  • Psychological interventions to prevent depression: a cause for hope (2024, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • The Rumination on Problems Questionnaire: Broadening our Understanding of Rumination and its Links to Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Young Adults (2023, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment)
  • Telehealth-delivered depression prevention: Short-term outcomes from a school-based randomized controlled trial (2024, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  • Rumination on Problems Questionnaire (2024, PsycTESTS Dataset)

Frequent collaborators include Clorinda E. Vélez, Kim Ngan Hoang, Elizabeth D. Krause, Tayyab Rashid, and Afroze Anjum, each contributing to multiple publications alongside Jane E. Gillham.

Publications appear across a range of journals and datasets such as:

  • Europe's Journal of Psychology
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Jane E. Gillham has also contributed to book publications through Hogrefe Publishing eBooks, with works including Strengths-Based Resilience and the Strengths-Based Resilience Workbook, both published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Positive Education: Positive Psychology and Classroom Interventions.

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Randal M. Ernst;Jane Gillham;Karen Reivich

  • Prevention of depressive symptoms in school children

    Lisa H. Jaycox;Karen J. Reivich;Jane Gillham;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Prevention of Depressive Symptoms in Schoolchildren: Two-Year Follow-Up

    Jane E. Gillham;Karen J. Reivich;Lisa H. Jaycox;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • The Optimistic Child

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Karen Reivich;Lisa Jaycox;Jane Gillham

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s Effect on Depressive Symptoms

    Steven M. Brunwasser;Jane E. Gillham;Eric S. Kim

  • Character Strengths Predict Subjective Well-Being During Adolescence

    Jane Gillham;Zoe Adams-Deutsch;Jaclyn Werner;Karen Reivich

  • School-Based Prevention of Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Study of the Effectiveness and Specificity of the Penn Resiliency Program

    Jane E. Gillham;Karen J. Reivich;Derek R. Freres;Tara M. Chaplin

  • Optimism, Pessimism, And Explanatory Style

    Jane E. Gillham;Andrew J. Shatté;Karen J. Reivich;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Preventing Depression Among Early Adolescents in the Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Study of the Penn Resiliency Program

    Jane E. Gillham;Jane E. Gillham;John Hamilton;Derek R. Freres;Ken Patton

  • Footsteps on the road to a positive psychology.

    Jane E. Gillham;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Cultivating Optimism In Childhood And Adolescence

    Jane Gillham;Karen Reivich

  • From Helplessness to Optimism: The Role of Resilience in Treating and Preventing Depression in Youth

    Karen Reivich;Jane E. Gillham;Tara M. Chaplin;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Preventing depression: A review of cognitive-behavioral and family interventions

    Jane E. Gillham;Andrew J. Shatté;Derek R. Freres

  • School-Based Prevention Of Depression And Anxiety Symptoms In Early Adolescence: A Pilot Of A Parent Intervention Component

    Jane E. Gillham;Karen J. Reivich;Derek R. Freres;Marisa Lascher

  • Toward A Developmental Operational Definition Of Autism

    Jane E. Gillham;Alice S. Carter;Alice S. Carter;Fred R. Volkmar;Sara S. Sparrow

  • Depression Prevention for Early Adolescent Girls: A Pilot Study of All Girls Versus Co-Ed Groups.

    Tara M. Chaplin;Jane E. Gillham;Karen Reivich;Andrea G. L. Elkon

  • Gender, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms: A Longitudinal Study of Early Adolescents.

    Tara M. Chaplin;Jane E. Gillham;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Through the lens of strength: A framework for educating the heart

    Mark Linkins;Ryan M. Niemiec;Jane Gillham;Donna Mayerson

  • Prevention of Depressive Symptoms in Schoolchildren: A Research Update

    Jane E. Gillham;Karen J. Reivich

  • Evaluation of a Group Cognitive-Behavioral Depression Prevention Program for Young Adolescents: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial

    Jane E. Gillham;Karen J. Reivich;Steven M. Brunwasser;Derek R. Freres

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania
Robert Gallop
Robert Gallop West Chester University
Tara M. Chaplin
Tara M. Chaplin George Mason University
John W. Peabody
John W. Peabody University of California, San Francisco
Jami F. Young
Jami F. Young Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Laura Mufson
Laura Mufson Columbia University
Alice S. Carter
Alice S. Carter University of Massachusetts Boston
Lisa H. Jaycox
Lisa H. Jaycox RAND Corporation
Fred R. Volkmar
Fred R. Volkmar Yale University
Jessica L. Schleider
Jessica L. Schleider Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career pathways. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a substance abuse counselor. These professionals are essential in helping individuals overcome addiction and maintain recovery.

Requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor often vary by location. For instance, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fresno emphasize both relevant education and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, understanding Garland substance abuse counselors education requirements can help students map out their academic journey.

Certification is also a key consideration. Prospective counselors should explore the Gilbert substance abuse counselor certification requirements as well as the substance abuse counselor requirements in Glendale to fully understand the necessary steps for licensure.

Online psychology degrees can offer flexible training options, allowing students to meet these requirements while gaining hands-on experience. Exploring local regulations and certification paths will ensure your education aligns with your desired career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Jane E. Gillham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles