World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
21241
World Ranking
3638
National Ranking
181

Henk Schut publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk Schut sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Henk Schut D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk Schut sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henk Schut is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology and public health-related areas. Within these fields, Schut has contributed notably to understanding grief, bereavement, and mental health, as well as migration, health and trauma. Additional topics addressed include health disparities and outcomes, homelessness and social issues, palliative care and end-of-life issues, posttraumatic stress disorder research, and intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving.

Schut's work has been published in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Among recent publications associated with Schut are:

  • Bereavement in Times of COVID-19: A Review and Theoretical Framework, published in 2020 in OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
  • A systematic review of loneliness in bereavement: Current research and future directions, published in 2021 in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Bereavement or breakup: Differences in networks of depression, published in 2020 in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Stages of Grief Portrayed on the Internet: A Systematic Analysis and Critical Appraisal, published in 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Cremation and Grief: Are Ways of Commemorating the Dead Related to Adjustment Over Time?, published in 2020 in OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying

Schut frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Margaret Stroebe
  • Paul A. Boelen
  • Maarten C. Eisma
  • Anneke Vedder
  • Kathrin Boerner

Their research contributions engage with a range of intersecting psychological and health disciplines, including clinical psychology, public and environmental health, and social psychology. Schut's work notably covers clinical applications related to grief and loss, as well as broader social and health-related issues.

Best Publications

  • THE DUAL PROCESS MODEL OF COPING WITH BEREAVEMENT: RATIONALE AND DESCRIPTION

    Margaret S Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Health outcomes of bereavement.

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • The dual process model of coping with bereavement: a decade on.

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Margaret Stroebe;Georgios Abakoumkin;Henk Schut

  • Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: An empirical and theoretical review.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • The efficacy of bereavement interventions: Determining who benefits.

    Henk Schut;Margaret S. Stroebe;Jan van den Bout;Maaike Terheggen

  • Why dieters fail : Testing the goal conflict model of eating

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Wendy Mensink;Henk Aarts;Henk Schut

  • Meaning making in the Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement

    Stroebe;H.A.W. Schut

  • The prediction of bereavement outcome: Development of an integrative risk factor framework

    Margaret Susan Stroebe;Susan Folkman;Robert O Hansson;Henk Schut

  • Attachment in Coping With Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Henk Schut;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Models of coping with bereavement: A review.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Does disclosure of emotions facilitate recovery from bereavement? Evidence from two prospective studies.

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut;Emmanuelle Zech

  • Grief work, disclosure and counseling: do they help the bereaved?

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut;Margaret S Stroebe

  • Risk factors in bereavement outcome: A methodological and empirical review.

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement: Toward theoretical integration

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut;Kathrin Boerner

  • To Continue or Relinquish Bonds: A Review of Consequences for the Bereaved

    Margaret Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Introduction: Concepts and issues in contemporary research on bereavement.

    Margaret S. Stroebe;Robert O. Hansson;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • Bereavement research: methodological issues and ethical concerns

    Margaret Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Schut

  • The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory

    W. Stroebe;Stroebe;G. Abakoumkin;H.A.W. Schut

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Stroebe
Margaret Stroebe Utrecht University
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Jan van den Bout
Jan van den Bout Utrecht University
Maarten C. Eisma
Maarten C. Eisma University of Groningen
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Catrin Finkenauer
Catrin Finkenauer Utrecht University
Kathrin Boerner
Kathrin Boerner Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Robert O. Hansson
Robert O. Hansson University of Tulsa
Rolf J. Kleber
Rolf J. Kleber Utrecht University
Peter G. M. van der Heijden
Peter G. M. van der Heijden University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA offers flexibility and accessibility for busy students and working professionals. Choosing the right program is important, as value varies based on cost, reputation, and career outcomes.

Some cities stand out for the quality and value of their psychology programs. For students considering the East Coast, the most valuable psychology programs in New York are known for prestigious faculty and connections to diverse career opportunities. Those on the West Coast may find the most valuable psychology programs in Phoenix an excellent fit, providing affordability and practical training.

The Southeast also offers standout options: the best value psychology programs in Raleigh combine low tuition with a strong job market. In the Midwest, the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in St. Louis highlights schools offering robust alumni networks and clinical placements.

Graduates can pursue careers in counseling, education, social services, research, and more. Choose an online program with the right balance of value, flexibility, and support to reach your goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Henk Schut

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles