World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8223 7678 812 775 86 7038

Fiona Maccallum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fiona Maccallum between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fiona Maccallum published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2025. 16 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2025. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1995 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fiona Maccallum: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 5
2003 5
2004 5
2005 2
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 0
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
2013 2
2014 3
2015 2
2016 5
2017 5
2018 8
2019 3
2020 4
2021 7
2022 3
2023 8
2024 7
2025 9
Total 108
Download as CSV

Fiona Maccallum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Maccallum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fiona Maccallum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Maccallum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fiona Maccallum is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology. The subfields in which they are active include social psychology, general health professions, emergency medicine, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics addressed in their work cover grief, bereavement, and mental health, migration, health and trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder research. Additional areas of interest involve homelessness and social issues, palliative care and end-of-life issues, patient safety and medication errors, as well as emergency and acute care studies.

Frequent publication venues for Fiona Maccallum's research include:

  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • JAMA Psychiatry

Their recent papers feature a range of topics and publication years:

  • "Augmenting trauma-focused psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder with brief aerobic exercise in Australia: a randomised clinical trial," 2022, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "An exploration of gender and prolonged grief symptoms using network analysis," 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • "Depression, Anxiety and Post-traumatic Growth Among Bereaved Adults: A Latent Class Analysis," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The influence of professional identity on how the receiver receives and responds to a speaking up message: a cross-sectional study," 2023, BMC Nursing
  • "Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs Mindfulness in Treatment of Prolonged Grief Disorder," 2024, JAMA Psychiatry

Fiona Maccallum has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Blake M. McKimmie, Richard A. Bryant, Melanie Barlow, Bernadette Watson, and Katie Dawson. These collaborations have appeared in multiple studies over time, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: a follow‐up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence

    Fiona MacCallum;Susan Golombok

  • The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence

    S. Golombok;A. Brewaeys;M.T. Giavazzi;D. Guerra

  • Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers

    Vasanti Jadva;Clare Murray;Emma Lycett;Fiona MacCallum

  • Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: preliminary data.

    Jackie Joukhador;Alex Blaszczynski;Fiona Maccallum

  • Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent–child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3

    S. Golombok;C. Murray;V. Jadva;E. Lycett

  • Treating Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Richard A. Bryant;Lucy Kenny;Amy Joscelyne;Natasha Rawson

  • A Cognitive Attachment Model of prolonged grief: Integrating attachments, memory, and identity

    Fiona Maccallum;Richard A. Bryant

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and prolonged grief in refugees exposed to trauma and loss

    Angela Nickerson;Belinda J Liddell;Fiona Maccallum;Zachary Steel

  • Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation.

    Susan Golombok;Emma Lycett;Fiona MacCallum;Vasanti Jadva

  • Conflicting desire and the child's theory of mind

    Chris Moore;Christopher Jarrold;James Russell;Alistair Lumb

  • The "Test-Tube" Generation: Parent-Child Relationships and the Psychological Well-Being of In Vitro Fertilization Children at Adolescence

    Susan Golombok;Fiona MacCallum;Emma Goodman

  • A systematic review of the parenting and outcomes experienced by offspring of mothers with borderline personality pathology: Potential mechanisms and clinical implications.

    Julie Eyden;Catherine Winsper;Dieter Wolke;Matthew R. Broome

  • Families with Children Conceived by Donor Insemination: A Follow-Up at Age Twelve

    Susan Golombok;Fiona MacCallum;Emma Goodman;Michael Rutter

  • Surrogacy: The experience of commissioning couples

    Fiona MacCallum;Emma Lycett;Clare Murray;Vasanti Jadva

  • Families Created Through Surrogacy Arrangements: Parent-Child Relationships in the 1st Year of Life

    Susan Golombok;Clare Murray;Vasanti Jadva;Fiona MacCallum

  • Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gamblers.

    Jackie Joukhador;Fiona Maccallum;Alex Blaszczynski

  • Families created by gamete donation: follow-up at age 2.

    S. Golombok;V. Jadva;E. Lycett;C. Murray

  • Surrogacy families: parental functioning, parent-child relationships and children's psychological development at age 2.

    Susan Golombok;Fiona MacCallum;Clare Murray;Emma Lycett

  • Pathological gambling and suicidality: an analysis of severity and lethality.

    Fiona Maccallum;Alex Blaszczynski

  • Pathological gambling and comorbid substance use.

    Fiona Maccallum;Alex Blaszczynski

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Bryant
Richard A. Bryant University of New South Wales
Susan Golombok
Susan Golombok University of Cambridge
George A. Bonanno
George A. Bonanno Columbia University
Alex Blaszczynski
Alex Blaszczynski University of Sydney
Catherine M. Cahill
Catherine M. Cahill University of California, Los Angeles
Angela Nickerson
Angela Nickerson University of New South Wales
John Rust
John Rust University of Cambridge
Amanda J. Barnier
Amanda J. Barnier Macquarie University
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy New York University
Cesar Augusto Piccinini
Cesar Augusto Piccinini Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology or counseling, online master’s degree programs offer a flexible path to achieve your goals. Many students seek online programs because of their affordability, convenience, and the ability to study while working. Key issues include evaluating tuition costs, accreditation, and the specific counseling licensure requirements in each state.

For prospective students in Florida, several of the most affordable online master's in counseling degree programs in Fort Lauderdale are designed to meet the needs of a diverse student population. In the Southeast, the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Georgia provide budget-friendly options without sacrificing quality.

On the West Coast, students can explore affordable online counseling master's degrees in Los Angeles, which offer accessible pathways for those in California and surrounding areas. If you’re based in the Northeast, consider the most affordable online master's in counseling degree programs in New York City.

Exploring these regional programs can help you find the right balance between cost, flexibility, and career advancement in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Fiona Maccallum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles