World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy

Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4981 4619 2734 2475 118 11070

Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2020. 27 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2020. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 19 publications
2007 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 0
2009 0
2010 1
2011 3
2012 4
2013 8
2014 9
2015 9
2016 6
2017 15
2018 7
2019 7
2020 20
2021 18
2022 9
2023 6
2024 8
2025 19
Total 151
Download as CSV

Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and medicine, focusing extensively on mental health and trauma-related topics.

The primary fields of study for this researcher include Psychology and Medicine, with notable work in several subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Applied Psychology.

The main research topics addressed by Galatzer-Levy cover Mental Health Research Topics, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Traumatic Stress, and JAMA Psychiatry.

Coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Galatzer-Levy are Vijay Yadav, Katharina Schultebraucks, Anzar Abbas, Vidya Koesmahargyo, and Birgit Kleim.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on machine learning applications, stress disorders, and resilience in the context of trauma:

  • Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry, 2022, published in Patterns
  • A validated predictive algorithm of post-traumatic stress course following emergency department admission after a traumatic stressor, 2020, published in Nature Medicine
  • Deep learning-based classification of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma utilizing visual and auditory markers of arousal and mood, 2020, published in Psychological Medicine
  • Resilience to potential trauma and adversity through regulatory flexibility, 2023, published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Resilience and Disaster: Flexible Adaptation in the Face of Uncertain Threat, 2023, published in Annual Review of Psychology

Best Publications

  • Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness.

    Madeleine Goodkind;Simon B. Eickhoff;Desmond J. Oathes;Desmond J. Oathes;Ying Jiang;Ying Jiang

  • 636,120 Ways to Have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder:

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Richard A. Bryant

  • Trajectories of resilience and dysfunction following potential trauma: A review and statistical evaluation.

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Sandy H. Huang;George A. Bonanno

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Trajectories of resilience, depression, and anxiety following spinal cord injury.

    George A. Bonanno;Paul Kennedy;Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Peter Lude

  • Coping Flexibility, Potentially Traumatic Life Events, and Resilience: A Prospective Study of College Student Adjustment

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Charles L. Burton;George A. Bonanno

  • Quantitative forecasting of PTSD from early trauma responses: A Machine Learning application

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Karen-Inge Karstoft;Alexander Statnikov;Arieh Y. Shalev

  • Trajectory of post-traumatic stress following traumatic injury: 6-year follow-up

    Richard A Bryant;Angela Nickerson;Mark Creamer;Meaghan O'Donnell

  • Patterns of lifetime PTSD comorbidity: a latent class analysis.

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Angela Nickerson;Brett T. Litz;Charles R. Marmar

  • Beyond normality in the study of bereavement: Heterogeneity in depression outcomes following loss in older adults

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;George A. Bonanno

  • The impact of killing and injuring others on mental health symptoms among police officers.

    Irina Komarovskaya;Shira Maguen;Shannon E. McCaslin;Thomas J. Metzler

  • Positive and Negative Emotion Prospectively Predict Trajectories of Resilience and Distress Among High-Exposure Police Officers

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Adam D. Brown;Clare Henn-Haase;Thomas J. Metzler

  • Amygdala Reactivity and Anterior Cingulate Habituation Predict Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Maintenance After Acute Civilian Trauma.

    Jennifer S. Stevens;Ye Ji Kim;Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Renuka Reddy

  • Early PTSD Symptom Trajectories: Persistence, Recovery, and Response to Treatment: Results from the Jerusalem Trauma Outreach and Prevention Study (J-TOPS)

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Yael Ankri;Sara Freedman;Yossi Israeli-Shalev

  • Bridging a translational gap: using machine learning to improve the prediction of PTSD

    Karen-Inge Karstoft;Isaac R Galatzer-Levy;Alexander Statnikov;Zhiguo Li

  • Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry

    Unknown

  • Utilization of machine learning for prediction of post-traumatic stress: a re-examination of cortisol in the prediction and pathways to non-remitting PTSD

    I R Galatzer-Levy;S Ma;A Statnikov;R Yehuda

  • Peritraumatic and Trait Dissociation Differentiate Police Officers with Resilient versus Symptomatic Trajectories of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Anita Madan;Thomas C. Neylan;Clare Henn-Haase

  • Prediction of Sex-Specific Suicide Risk Using Machine Learning and Single-Payer Health Care Registry Data From Denmark.

    Jaimie L. Gradus;Jaimie L. Gradus;Anthony J. Rosellini;Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó;Amy E. Street;Amy E. Street

  • Optimism and Death: Predicting the Course and Consequences of Depression Trajectories in Response to Heart Attack

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;George A. Bonanno

  • Heterogeneity in threat extinction learning: substantive and methodological considerations for identifying individual difference in response to stress

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;George A. Bonanno;David E. A. Bush;Joseph E. LeDoux

  • Cortisol response to an experimental stress paradigm prospectively predicts long-term distress and resilience trajectories in response to active police service

    Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy;Maria M. Steenkamp;Adam D. Brown;Meng Qian

Frequent Co-Authors

George A. Bonanno
George A. Bonanno Columbia University
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Barbara O. Rothbaum
Barbara O. Rothbaum Emory University
Tanja Jovanovic
Tanja Jovanovic Wayne State University
Charles B. Nemeroff
Charles B. Nemeroff The University of Texas at Austin
Arieh Y. Shalev
Arieh Y. Shalev New York University
Birgit Kleim
Birgit Kleim University of Zurich
Amy E. Street
Amy E. Street VA Boston Healthcare System
Charles R. Marmar
Charles R. Marmar New York University
Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens many pathways, both academically and professionally. Many students consider online degrees, which offer flexibility and the opportunity to specialize in fields like counseling, mental health, and substance abuse treatment.

One prominent area is substance abuse counseling, which has unique certification and education requirements depending on your location. For example, aspiring professionals should be aware of Newark substance abuse counselor certification requirements and Norfolk substance abuse counselors education requirements before deciding on an academic program.

Requirements can vary widely in other regions as well. In some areas, such as North Las Vegas, it’s important to understand the North Las Vegas substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Prospective counselors in California should also review details on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oakland.

By exploring these pathways, students can prepare for impactful careers supporting individuals and communities while ensuring they meet the necessary educational and licensing criteria for their chosen location.

Best Scientists Citing Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles