World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
George E. Newman

George E. Newman

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
8330
World Ranking
4705
National Ranking
2235

George E. Newman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George E. Newman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

George E. Newman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George E. Newman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

George E. Newman is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas in psychology, with a primary focus on marketing, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. They have contributed to fields including sociology and political science as well as gender studies.

Their work covers various key topics such as the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, environmental sustainability in business, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychology of social influence, environmental education and sustainability, and the interplay of religion, spirituality, and psychology.

Newman has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Consumer Psychology Review
  • Psychological Science
  • Journal of Consumer Research

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Newman include:

  • Inauthenticity aversion: Moral reactance toward tainted actors, actions, and objects (2020), Consumer Psychology Review
  • An Emphasis on Brilliance Fosters Masculinity-Contest Cultures (2022), Psychological Science
  • The Curse of the Original: How and When Heritage Branding Reduces Consumer Evaluations of Enhanced Products (2021), Journal of Consumer Research
  • Exalted Purchases or Tainted Donations? Self-signaling and the Evaluation of Charitable Incentives (2020), Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Seeking Stability: Consumer Motivations for Communal Nostalgia (2021), Journal of Consumer Psychology

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Joshua Knobe
  • Natalie O. Fedotova
  • Paul Rozin
  • Minju Han
  • Jin Kim

Newman's research contributes to understanding complex psychological phenomena within consumer culture and social behavior by integrating perspectives across subfields such as marketing, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation

    David G. Rand;Alexander Peysakhovich;Alexander Peysakhovich;Gordon T. Kraft-Todd;George E. Newman

  • Celebrity Contagion and the Value of Objects

    George E. Newman;Gil Diesendruck;Paul Bloom

  • Art and authenticity: the importance of originals in judgments of value.

    George E. Newman;Paul Bloom

  • The True Self: A Psychological Concept Distinct From the Self:

    Nina Strohminger;Joshua Knobe;George Newman

  • Authenticity Is Contagious: Brand Essence and the Original Source of Production

    George E. Newman;Ravi Dhar

  • When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements

    George E. Newman;Margarita Gorlin;Ravi Dhar

  • Value Judgments and the True Self

    George E. Newman;Paul Bloom;Joshua Knobe

  • Authenticity

    Unknown

  • The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy

    Tao Gao;George E. Newman;Brian J. Scholl

  • Tainted Altruism When Doing Some Good Is Evaluated as Worse Than Doing No Good at All

    George E. Newman;Daylian M. Cain

  • Beliefs About the True Self Explain Asymmetries Based on Moral Judgment

    George E. Newman;Julian De Freitas;Joshua Knobe

  • Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation

    Joshua Knobe;Sandeep Prasada;George E. Newman

  • The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences

    Victoria Brescoll;Eric Luis Uhlmann;George E. Newman

  • Tracing the identity of objects.

    Lance J. Rips;Sergey Blok;George Newman

  • Giving Versus Giving In

    Daylian M. Cain;Jason Dana;George E. Newman

  • Individuals and Their Concepts.

    Sergey V. Blok;George Newman;Lance Jeffrey Rips

  • Kinds of Authenticity

    George E. Newman;Rosanna K. Smith

  • Early understandings of the link between agents and order

    George E. Newman;Frank C. Keil;Valerie A. Kuhlmeier;Karen Wynn

  • The pipeline project : Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline

    Martin Schweinsberg;Nikhil Madan;Michelangelo Vianello;S. Amy Sommer

  • Social Context and the Dynamics of Cooperative Choice

    David G. Rand;George E. Newman;Owen M. Wurzbacher

  • Consistent Belief in a Good True Self in Misanthropes and Three Interdependent Cultures

    Julian De Freitas;Hagop Sarkissian;George E. Newman;Igor Grossmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi Dhar
Ravi Dhar Yale University
Joshua Knobe
Joshua Knobe Yale University
Lance J. Rips
Lance J. Rips Northwestern University
Brian J. Scholl
Brian J. Scholl Yale University
Frank C. Keil
Frank C. Keil Yale University
Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Karen Wynn
Karen Wynn Yale University
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest grows in Social Sciences and Humanities, students have more flexible options to advance their careers. Online master degree programs allow learners to earn advanced credentials in as little as one year, making it easier to balance studies with work or family responsibilities.

For those seeking a quicker undergraduate experience, an accelerated bachelor's degree online offers a fast-track path into fields like psychology, sociology, and education. These programs cut down on the time and cost required to graduate, while providing a high-quality, flexible education.

If you’re interested in fields like social work, affordable options do exist. Affordable online MSW programs let students pursue advanced social work training and gain eligibility for licensure, often without ever stepping foot on campus.

For those considering a career in applied behavioral analysis, choosing bcba accredited programs online ensures you meet professional standards and open doors to in-demand roles. Online degrees are expanding your pathways to meaningful social science and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing George E. Newman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles