World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
89
Citations
68402
World Ranking
2488
National Ranking
175

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
76
Citations
57382
World Ranking
683
National Ranking
42

Alvis Brazma publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alvis Brazma sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 207 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Alvis Brazma D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alvis Brazma sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alvis Brazma is affiliated with the European Bioinformatics Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on molecular biology.

The main fields of study for Brazma include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these areas, Brazma's work covers several subfields:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Biophysics
  • Spectroscopy
  • Cancer Research

The scientist's research topics highlight their involvement in cutting-edge techniques and relevant biomedical challenges:

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Some of Brazma's recent papers include:

  • "The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences", 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 Is an Interferon-Stimulated Gene in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Is Detected in Specific Cell Subsets across Tissues", 2020, Cell
  • "Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence", 2020, Nature
  • "Expression Atlas update: gene and protein expression in multiple species", 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Putative cell type discovery from single-cell gene expression data", 2020, Nature Methods

Brazma frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Irene Papatheodorou
  • Zhichao Miao
  • Nuno A. Fonseca
  • Pablo Moreno
  • Manik Garg

The scientist's work has been published in various venues, with the most frequent being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Nature Methods

Best Publications

  • The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data.

    Yasset Perez-Riverol;Attila Csordas;Jingwen Bai;Manuel Bernal-Llinares

  • The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences.

    Yasset Perez-Riverol;Jingwen Bai;Chakradhar Bandla;David García-Seisdedos

  • Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.

    Alvis Brazma;Pascal Hingamp;John Quackenbush;Gavin Sherlock

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis

    Steffen Durinck;Yves Moreau;Arek Kasprzyk;Sean Davis

  • SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 Is an Interferon-Stimulated Gene in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Is Detected in Specific Cell Subsets across Tissues.

    Carly G.K. Ziegler;Samuel J. Allon;Sarah K. Nyquist;Ian M. Mbano

  • Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans

    Tuuli Lappalainen;Michael Sammeth;Marc R. Friedländer;Peter A. C. ‘t Hoen

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE)

    Richard M. Myers;John Stamatoyannopoulos;Michael Snyder;Ian Dunham

  • ArrayExpress—a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI

    Helen E. Parkinson;Ugis Sarkans;Mohammadreza Shojatalab;Niran Abeygunawardena

  • Gene expression data analysis.

    Alvis Brazma;Jaak Vilo

  • GLOBAL TRANSCRIPTIONAL RESPONSES OF FISSION YEAST TO ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS

    Dongrong Chen;W. Mark Toone;Juan Mata;Rachel Lyne

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • ArrayExpress—a public database of microarray experiments and gene expression profiles

    Helen E. Parkinson;Misha Kapushesky;Mohammadreza Shojatalab;Niran Abeygunawardena

  • ArrayExpress update—simplifying data submissions

    Nikolay Kolesnikov;Emma Hastings;Maria Keays;Olga Melnichuk

  • The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format--a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data.

    Henning Hermjakob;Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi;Gary Bader;Jérôme Wojcik

  • Expression Atlas update—an integrated database of gene and protein expression in humans, animals and plants

    Robert Petryszak;Maria Keays;Y. Amy Tang;Nuno A. Fonseca

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

    Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts

  • Periodic gene expression program of the fission yeast cell cycle

    Gabriella Rustici;Juan Mata;Katja Kivinen;Pietro Lió

  • ArrayExpress update - from bulk to single-cell expression data.

    Awais Athar;Anja Füllgrabe;Nancy George;Haider Iqbal

  • ArrayExpress - a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ugis Sarkans
Ugis Sarkans European Bioinformatics Institute
Helen Parkinson
Helen Parkinson European Bioinformatics Institute
John Quackenbush
John Quackenbush Harvard University
Jaak Vilo
Jaak Vilo University of Tartu
John C. Marioni
John C. Marioni European Bioinformatics Institute
Oliver Stegle
Oliver Stegle German Cancer Research Center
Gavin Sherlock
Gavin Sherlock Stanford University
Esko Ukkonen
Esko Ukkonen University of Helsinki
Christian J. Stoeckert
Christian J. Stoeckert University of Pennsylvania
Paul Flicek
Paul Flicek The Jackson Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can expand your career options in Engineering and Technology, or open doors to related fields. For those interested in the business side of technical industries, pursuing the cheapest online mba aacsb programs can help you gain leadership skills and a broader business perspective at an affordable cost.

If your career interests are more people-oriented, an advanced masters in human resource management can help you oversee talent and organizational development, which is vital in today’s tech-driven companies.

Looking for a niche area that complements engineering? Legal knowledge can be a distinct advantage. Accredited aba-approved online paralegal programs offer a pathway into legal fields related to technology, patents, or compliance.

For those drawn to management and operations, especially within tech companies, consider an accelerated hospitality degree online. Rapid completion options can quickly prepare you for leadership roles in technology-fueled hospitality environments.

Each of these online programs offers unique advantages, helping you diversify your skill set and boost your professional prospects beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Alvis Brazma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles