World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8531 7965 97 92 136 7041

Birgit Kleim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Birgit Kleim between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Birgit Kleim published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2022. 55 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2022. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 25 publications
2007 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Birgit Kleim: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 4
2009 1
2010 1
2011 8
2012 10
2013 5
2014 7
2015 5
2016 5
2017 4
2018 9
2019 6
2020 19
2021 26
2022 33
2023 26
2024 30
2025 25
Total 227
Download as CSV

Birgit Kleim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Birgit Kleim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 136
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Birgit Kleim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Birgit Kleim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Birgit Kleim is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and neuroscience, with significant contributions to both fields over numerous publications.

Their work covers a range of topics including mental health research, digital mental health interventions, suicide and self-harm studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, memory and neural mechanisms, posttraumatic stress disorder research, as well as sleep and wakefulness research.

Kleim has a broad publication record in key subfields such as clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and social psychology. The primary areas of study integrate psychological and neuroscientific principles, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Kleim include:

  • Erich Seifritz
  • Marta Anna Marciniak
  • Raffaël Kalisch
  • Stephanie Homan
  • Tobias Kowatsch

Common venues for Kleim's publications include:

  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • Psychological Medicine

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown", 2021, published in Translational Psychiatry
  • "Real-world stress resilience is associated with the responsivity of the locus coeruleus", 2021, published in Nature Communications
  • "Rethinking post-traumatic stress disorder - A predictive processing perspective", 2020, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Long-term outcomes of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis", 2021, published in Psychological Medicine
  • "Role of the locus coeruleus arousal system in cognitive control", 2020, published in Journal of Neuroendocrinology

Kleim has also contributed to book publications, including a 2023 title published by Frontiers Media titled How Does Sleep Help Regulate Negative Emotion?

Their research reflects an intersection of clinical and cognitive methods to investigate mental health outcomes, stress resilience, and neurobiological mechanisms tied to psychological well-being. Their work addresses both theoretical perspectives and applied interventions.

Best Publications

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Self-efficacy and empowerment as outcomes of self-stigmatizing and coping in schizophrenia

    Roland Vauth;Birgit Kleim;Markus Wirtz;Patrick W. Corrigan

  • Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between posttraumatic growth and posttrauma depression and PTSD in assault survivors.

    Birgit Kleim;Anke Ehlers

  • Reduced autobiographical memory specificity predicts depression and posttraumatic stress disorder after recent trauma.

    Birgit Kleim;Anke Ehlers

  • Early predictors of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder in assault survivors

    Birgit Kleim;Anke Ehlers;Edward Glucksman

  • Efficacy of Coming Out Proud to reduce stigma's impact among people with mental illness: pilot randomised controlled trial

    Nicolas Rüsch;Elvira Abbruzzese;Eva Hagedorn;Daniel Hartenhauer

  • Cognitive change predicts symptom reduction with cognitive therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Birgit Kleim;Nick Grey;Jennifer Wild;Fridtjof W. Nussbeck

  • Mental Health in First Responders: A Review and Recommendation for Prevention and Intervention Strategies

    Birgit Kleim;Maren Westphal

  • Perceived stigma predicts low self-efficacy and poor coping in schizophrenia

    Birgit Kleim;Roland Vauth;Gundula Adam;Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz

  • Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown.

    Ilya M Veer;Antje Riepenhausen;Matthias Zerban;Carolin Wackerhagen

  • Aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder: State of the art and future perspectives

    Annika Gieselmann;Malik Ait Aoudia;Michelle Carr;Anne Germain

  • Sleep enhances exposure therapy

    Birgit Kleim;F H Wilhelm;L Temp;J Margraf

  • Are we addressing the ‘right stuff’ to enhance adherence in schizophrenia? Understanding the role of insight and attitudes towards medication

    Eva-Marina Beck;Marialuisa Cavelti;Sara Kvrgic;Birgit Kleim

  • Capturing Intrusive Re-experiencing in Trauma Survivors’ Daily Lives Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

    Birgit Kleim;Belinda Graham;Richard A. Bryant;Anke Ehlers

  • Effects of Sleep after Experimental Trauma on Intrusive Emotional Memories.

    Birgit Kleim;Julia Wysokowsky;Nuria Schmid;Erich Seifritz

  • Perceptual processing advantages for trauma-related visual cues in post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Birgit Kleim;T. Ehring;Anke Ehlers

  • Protective benefits of mindfulness in emergency room personnel

    Maren Westphal;Maren Westphal;Martina-Barbara Bingisser;Tianshu Feng;Melanie Wall

  • Real-world stress resilience is associated with the responsivity of the locus coeruleus

    Marcus Grueschow;Nico Stenz;Hanna Thörn;Ulrike Ehlert

  • Reduced Specificity in Episodic Future Thinking in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

    Birgit Kleim;Belinda Graham;Sonia Fihosy;Richard Stott

  • Investigating Cognitive Pathways to Psychopathology: Predicting Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder From Early Responses After Assault.

    Birgit Kleim;Anke Ehlers;Edward Glucksman

  • Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder - What combination of symptoms predicts best?

    Thomas Ehring;Birgit Kleim;David M. Clark;Edna B. Foa

  • Neuroimaging Correlates of Resilience to Traumatic Events-A Comprehensive Review

    Julia Bolsinger;Erich Seifritz;Birgit Kleim;Andrei Manoliu

Frequent Co-Authors

Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich
Thomas Ehring
Thomas Ehring Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Raffael Kalisch
Raffael Kalisch Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Henrik Walter
Henrik Walter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ulrike Ehlert
Ulrike Ehlert University of Zurich
Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy
Isaac R. Galatzer-Levy New York University
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg
Elgar Fleisch
Elgar Fleisch ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and career opportunities, especially in social work. Each state has its unique requirements for aspiring social workers, influencing both educational choices and career paths.

For example, New Jersey education requirements for social workers specify that a Bachelor’s or Master’s in Social Work (BSW or MSW) is necessary, along with state licensure. Similarly, to meet social worker degree requirements in New Mexico, candidates must obtain an accredited social work degree plus fulfill supervised experience for licensure.

States like New York have rigorous standards. The social worker education requirements in New York include a master’s degree from an accredited program and passing a state board exam. In contrast, social worker degree requirements in North Carolina allow entry-level positions with a bachelor’s degree, but advanced roles require graduate study.

Whether you intend to work as a counselor, clinical social worker, or in policy and advocacy, understanding specific state requirements is crucial. Online degrees in psychology and social work offer flexible paths to meet these diverse career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Birgit Kleim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles