World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4935 4575 222 219 176 13444

Thomas Ehring publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Ehring between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Ehring published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2025. 44 of the 294 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2025. 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

294 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Ehring: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 3
1991 1
1992 5
1993 3
1994 1
1995 6
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 7
2009 4
2010 7
2011 4
2012 14
2013 10
2014 13
2015 9
2016 2
2017 8
2018 7
2019 15
2020 21
2021 26
2022 29
2023 25
2024 19
2025 43
2026 1
Total 294
Download as CSV

Thomas Ehring publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Ehring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Ehring D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Ehring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Ehring is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany with a research focus primarily in Psychology, contributing extensively to subfields including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics and include:

  • Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic process, 2020, Emotion
  • Is Physical Activity Associated with Less Depression and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Rapid Systematic Review, 2021, Sports Medicine
  • Assessing repetitive negative thinking in daily life: Development of an ecological momentary assessment paradigm, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Fear of sleep and trauma-induced insomnia: A review and conceptual model, 2020, Sleep Medicine Reviews
  • Long-term outcomes of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Psychological Medicine

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Keisuke Takano
  • Tabea Rosenkranz
  • Charlotte E. Wittekind
  • Edward Watkins
  • Nexhmedin Morina

Thomas Ehring publishes regularly in the following venues:

  • European journal of psychotraumatology
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Trials

Their research spans key topics including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Best Publications

  • Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process

    Thomas Ehring;Edward R. Watkins

  • The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking.

    Thomas Ehring;Ulrike Zetsche;Kathrin Weidacker;Karina Wahl

  • Emotion regulation difficulties in trauma survivors: the role of trauma type and PTSD symptom severity.

    Thomas Ehring;Dorothea Quack

  • Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal.

    Thomas Ehring;Brunna Tuschen-Caffier;Jewgenija Schnülle;Silke Fischer

  • Childhood maltreatment and characteristics of adult depression: meta-analysis.

    Janna Nelson;Anne Klumparendt;Philipp Doebler;Thomas Ehring

  • Emotion regulation deficits in eating disorders: a marker of eating pathology or general psychopathology?

    Jennifer Svaldi;Julia Griepenstroh;Brunna Tuschen-Caffier;Thomas Ehring

  • Characteristics of emotion regulation in recovered depressed versus never depressed individuals

    Thomas Ehring;Silke Fischer;Jewgenija Schnülle;Andrea Bösterling

  • Do cognitive models help in predicting the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder, phobia, and depression after motor vehicle accidents? A prospective longitudinal study.

    Thomas Ehring;Anke Ehlers;Edward Glucksman

  • Meta-analysis of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood abuse

    Thomas Ehring;Renate Welboren;Nexhmedin Morina;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • The Role of Rumination and Reduced Concreteness in the Maintenance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Following Trauma

    Thomas Ehring;Silke Frank;Anke Ehlers

  • Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic process

    Barbara Cludius;Douglas Mennin;Thomas Ehring

  • The German version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): psychometric properties and diagnostic utility

    Antje Krüger-Gottschalk;Christine Knaevelsrud;Heinrich Rau;Anne Dyer

  • Prevention of anxiety disorders and depression by targeting excessive worry and rumination in adolescents and young adults: A randomized controlled trial

    Maurice Topper;Paul M G Emmelkamp;Ed Watkins;Thomas Ehring

  • Contribution of Cognitive Factors to the Prediction of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Phobia and Depression After Motor Vehicle Accidents

    Thomas Ehring;Anke Ehlers;Edward Glucksman

  • Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, and burnout in Pakistani earthquake recovery workers

    Thomas Ehring;Saiqa Razik;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Psychological treatments for concurrent posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder: A systematic review

    Debora van Dam;Ellen Vedel;Thomas Ehring;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Do acute psychological and psychobiological responses to trauma predict subsequent symptom severities of PTSD and depression

    Thomas Ehring;Anke Ehlers;Anthony J. Cleare;Edward Glucksman

  • Diagnostic Utility of the Impact of Event Scale–Revised in Two Samples of Survivors of War

    Nexhmedin Morina;Thomas Ehring;Stefan Priebe

  • Is repetitive negative thinking a transdiagnostic process? A comparison of key processes of RNT in depression, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and community controls.

    Karina Wahl;Thomas Ehring;Hanna Kley;Roselind Lieb

  • The effects of rumination on mood and intrusive memories after exposure to traumatic material: An experimental study.

    Ulrike Zetsche;Thomas Ehring;Anke Ehlers

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam
Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford
Birgit Kleim
Birgit Kleim University of Zurich
Edward R. Watkins
Edward R. Watkins University of Exeter
Christine Knaevelsrud
Christine Knaevelsrud Freie Universität Berlin
Filip Raes
Filip Raes KU Leuven
Nexhmedin Morina
Nexhmedin Morina University of Münster
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, especially in mental health and social services. Many students consider related fields, such as Social Work, for their online degree options. Social Work degrees equip students with practical skills in counseling, advocacy, and community support, making them highly relevant for those interested in helping professions.

Cost remains a key concern for many aspiring professionals. Luckily, there are various affordable options available. For example, those seeking affordable social work programs in Michigan can find reputable courses that fit different budgets. Meanwhile, individuals based in urban areas might explore options like affordable social work degrees in Minneapolis or the cheapest social work degrees in New York City.

Additionally, online learners from the southern U.S. can take advantage of affordable social work programs in Mississippi. By exploring these various online and local Social Work degree options, students can align their studies in Psychology with affordable, practical career-focused education.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Ehring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles