World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5852
World Ranking
10437
National Ranking
5482

Ronald S. Landis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald S. Landis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ronald S. Landis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald S. Landis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Ronald S. Landis is affiliated with the Illinois Institute of Technology in the United States. Their academic contributions focus on research published primarily within the fields of industrial and organizational psychology.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • IOP volume 14 issue 3 Cover and Front matter, 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • IOP volume 13 issue 1 Cover and Front matter, 2020, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • How to be a Good Reviewer? A Competency Framework for Reviewer Development, 2020, Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent co-authors working alongside Ronald S. Landis are:

  • George C. Banks
  • James G. Field
  • Frederick L. Oswald
  • Ernest H. O'Boyle
  • Deborah E. Rupp

Key publication venues where Ronald S. Landis has contributed include:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

In terms of recognition, Ronald S. Landis was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models

    Ronald S. Landis;Daniel J. Beal;Paul E. Tesluk

  • Why do employees worry about their jobs? A meta-analytic review of predictors of job insecurity.

    Alaina C. Keim;Ronald S. Landis;Charles A. Pierce;David R. Earnest

  • MECHANISMS LINKING REALISTIC JOB PREVIEWS WITH TURNOVER: A META‐ANALYTIC PATH ANALYSIS

    David R. Earnest;David G. Allen;Ronald S. Landis

  • Organizational climate as a moderator of safety knowledge–safety performance relationships

    Kristin Smith-Crowe;Michael J. Burke;Ronald S. Landis

  • Using Trace Data to Examine the Complex Roles of Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Emotional Self-Regulatory Processes During Learning with Multi-agent Systems

    Roger Azevedo;Jason Harley;Gregory Trevors;Melissa Duffy

  • Inductive reasoning: The promise of big data

    Samuel T. McAbee;Ronald S. Landis;Maura I. Burke

  • Applicant preferences for Web-based versus traditional job postings

    Rebecca R. Zusman;Ronald S. Landis

  • When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don't.

    Jose M. Cortina;Ronald S. Landis

  • Successfully Combining Meta-analysis and Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations and Strategies

    Ronald S. Landis

  • Investigating the incremental validity of employee engagement in the prediction of employee effectiveness: A meta-analytic path analysis

    Michael M. Mackay;Joseph A. Allen;Ronald S. Landis

  • Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    George C. Banks;Steven G. Rogelberg;Haley M. Woznyj;Ronald S. Landis

  • Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices

    George C. Banks;James G. Field;Frederick L. Oswald;Ernest H. O’Boyle

  • Quality and quantity goals in a complex decision task: Strategies and outcomes.

    Stephen W. Gilliland;Ronald S. Landis

  • Development of the just culture assessment tool: measuring the perceptions of health-care professionals in hospitals.

    Sarah Petschonek;Jonathan Burlison;Carl Cross;Kathy Martin

  • The Dimensionality of the Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989) Measure of Goal Commitment on Complex Tasks

    Richard P. DeShon;Ronald S. Landis

  • Moderated Multiple Regression Tests are Criterion Specific

    Ronald S. Landis;William P. Dunlap

  • Big Data Recommendations for Industrial–Organizational Psychology

    Richard A. Guzzo;Alexis A. Fink;Eden King;Scott Tonidandel

  • The Effectiveness of Pedagogical Agents’ Prompting and Feedback in Facilitating Co-adapted Learning with MetaTutor

    Roger Azevedo;Ronald S. Landis;Reza Feyzi-Behnagh;Melissa Duffy

  • On the practice of allowing correlated residuals among indicators in structural equation models.

    Ronald S. Landis;Bryan D. Edwards;Jose M. Cortina

  • The Earth Is Not Round (p ¼ .00)

    Jose M. Cortina;Ronald S. Landis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University
Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Michael J. Burke
Michael J. Burke Tulane University
Roger Azevedo
Roger Azevedo University of Central Florida
David G. Allen
David G. Allen Texas Christian University
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Charles A. Pierce
Charles A. Pierce University of Memphis
Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career options. Many students consider roles in mental health, counseling, or behavioral analysis after graduation. Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) positions are especially in demand due to the growing need for behavioral therapy across the country.

If you’re interested in this pathway, becoming a BCBA requires specific graduate coursework, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam. For local guidance, you can learn more about how to become a bcba in Tulsa or find out about the process for how to become a bcba in Virginia Beach.

Additionally, options can vary by region. Requirements for becoming a bcba in Washington DC or steps for becoming a bcba in Wichita highlight local rules and opportunities.

Online psychology degrees also support flexibility, letting you study while gaining field experience. Research each route to find the one that best fits your goals and preferred location.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald S. Landis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles