World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
6476
World Ranking
5667
National Ranking
2684

Dianna L. Stone publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianna L. Stone sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Dianna L. Stone D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianna L. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dianna L. Stone is affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a specialized focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. The scope of their work includes Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and interdisciplinary areas such as Biomedical Engineering and Demography.

Their publication record highlights a concentration on topics such as Employer Branding and e-HRM, AI and HR Technologies, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Work-Family Balance Challenges, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Human Resource and Talent Management, and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Organizational Dynamics
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • Journal of Tourism Futures

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Dianna L. Stone include:

  • Will artificial intelligence radically change human resource management processes? (2024, Organizational Dynamics)
  • The benefits of eHRM and AI for talent acquisition (2020, Journal of Tourism Futures)
  • Human Resources Analytics: A systematic Review from a Sustainable Management Approach (2022, Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology)
  • Will the use of AI in human resources create a digital Frankenstein? (2024, Organizational Dynamics)
  • Editorial: Voices from the academy: a response to President Donald Trump's anti-DEI policies (2025, Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal)

Among their frequent co-authors are Kimberly M. Lukaszewski, Richard D. Johnson, Ana M. Castaño, Antonio L. García-Izquierdo, and Mustafa F. Özbilgin.

Best Publications

  • A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations

    Dianna L. Stone;Adrienne Colella

  • The influence of technology on the future of human resource management

    Dianna L. Stone;Diana L. Deadrick;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski;Richard Johnson

  • Emerging issues in theory and research on electronic human resource management (eHRM).

    Dianna L. Stone;James H. Dulebohn

  • Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management

    Dianna L. Stone;Diana L. Deadrick

  • THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES ON REACTIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: AN INTEGRATION OF PRIVACY AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVES

    Erik R. Eddy;Dianna L. Stone;Eugene E Stone-Romero

  • Stigmas in organizations : race, handicaps, and physical unattractiveness

    Eugene F. Stone;Dianna L. Stone;Robert L. Dipboye

  • Factors affecting the acceptance and effectiveness of electronic human resource systems

    Dianna L. Stone;Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Kimberly Lukaszewski

  • Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: some food for thought

    Eduardo Salas;Mary P. Kosarzycki;C. Shawn Burke;Stephen M. Fiore

  • The impact of cultural values on the acceptance and effectiveness of human resource management policies and practices

    Dianna L. Stone;Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski

  • The Evolution of the Field of Human Resource Information Systems: Co-Evolution of Technology and HR Processes

    Richard D. Johnson;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski;Dianna L. Stone

  • Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research

    Eduardo Salas;D. Stone;Clint A. Blower;Nancy Cooke

  • Factors affecting the effectiveness and acceptance of electronic selection systems

    Dianna L. Stone;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski;Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Teresa L. Johnson

  • The benefits of eHRM and AI for talent acquisition

    Richard D. Johnson;Dianna L. Stone;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski

  • The Influence of Culture on Role Conceptions and Role Behavior in Organisations

    Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Dianna L. Stone;Eduardo Salas

  • AN EXPANDED MODEL OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCEPTANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

    Dianna L. Stone;Kimberly M. Lukaszewski

  • The brave new world of eHR : human resources management in the digital age

    Hal G. Gueutal;Dianna L. Stone;Eduardo Salas

  • Factors Affecting Hiring Decisions about Veterans

    Christopher Stone;Dianna L. Stone

  • Development of a multidimensional measure of perceived product quality

    Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Dianna L. Stone;Dhruv Grewal

  • The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy.

    Dianna L. Stone;Hal G. Gueutal;Barbara Mcintosh

  • Personnel Selection Procedures and Invasion of Privacy

    Eugene F. Stone-Romero;Dianna L. Stone;David Hyatt

  • Relations Among Ethnicity, Gender, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intention to Pursue a Career in Information Technology

    Richard D. Johnson;Dianna L. Stone;T. Nichole Phillips

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster
Nancy J. Cooke
Nancy J. Cooke Arizona State University
Lucy Gilson
Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town
Stephen M. Fiore
Stephen M. Fiore University of Central Florida
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Robert L. Dipboye
Robert L. Dipboye University of Central Florida
Lois E. Tetrick
Lois E. Tetrick George Mason University
James E. Driskell
James E. Driskell Florida Maxima Corporation
C. Shawn Burke
C. Shawn Burke University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities offers a wide range of academic and professional options—especially for students seeking flexible online learning. For many, affordability is a top concern. The cheapest online psychology degree programs make it possible to begin your studies without incurring excessive debt.

If you’re interested in counseling or mental health services, a variety of graduate pathways are available. Earning a masters in social work can open doors to roles in community organizations, healthcare, and schools. For those aiming for clinical psychology and advanced practice, many credentialed online psych d programs can accelerate your route to licensure.

Family and relationship therapy is another rewarding area. Programs such as mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) prepare graduates for specialized therapeutic careers, often in less time than you might expect.

Online degrees in these fields are designed for both recent graduates and working professionals, helping you gain credentials and skills needed for fulfilling careers in social impact, advocacy, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Dianna L. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles