What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- Enzyme
Her primary scientific interests are in Pharmacology, Opioid, Molecular biology, Morphine and Receptor.
Her research ties Chronic pain and Pharmacology together.
Her research on Opioid frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Hyperalgesia.
Her study in Hyperalgesia is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Neurotrophic factors, -Naloxone, Neuroscience and Microglia.
Her Molecular biology research incorporates elements of Protein kinase B, Akt/PKB signaling pathway, Transcription factor, Transactivation and Amyloid precursor protein.
Her studies in Receptor integrate themes in fields like Central nervous system, In situ hybridization and Blot.
Her most cited work include:
- An iron-responsive element type II in the 5'-untranslated region of the Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein transcript. (434 citations)
- TNF-α and neuropathic pain - a review (363 citations)
- Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the clinician (344 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Catherine M. Cahill spends much of her time researching Pharmacology, Opioid, Neuroscience, Receptor and Neuropathic pain.
Specifically, her work in Pharmacology is concerned with the study of Morphine.
She studied Opioid and Hyperalgesia that intersect with -Naloxone.
Catherine M. Cahill interconnects Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and κ-opioid receptor in the investigation of issues within Neuroscience.
While the research belongs to areas of Receptor, Catherine M. Cahill spends her time largely on the problem of Cell biology, intersecting her research to questions surrounding Amyloid precursor protein.
Her work deals with themes such as δ-opioid receptor and Chronic pain, which intersect with Neuropathic pain.
She most often published in these fields:
- Pharmacology (29.80%)
- Opioid (27.78%)
- Neuroscience (27.78%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Opioid (27.78%)
- Pharmacology (29.80%)
- Neuroscience (27.78%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of study are Opioid, Pharmacology, Neuroscience, Cell biology and Amyloid precursor protein.
Her Opioid research integrates issues from Chronic pain, Addiction and Opiate.
Pharmacology is represented through her Morphine and Analgesic research.
Her Neuroscience research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Dynorphin, Receptor, κ-opioid receptor and Function.
She has included themes like Iron homeostasis, Five prime untranslated region and Neuroprotection in her Cell biology study.
The various areas that Catherine M. Cahill examines in her Amyloid precursor protein study include Oxidative stress, Neuroinflammation and Ferritin.
Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Pain-Induced Negative Affect Is Mediated via Recruitment of The Nucleus Accumbens Kappa Opioid System. (57 citations)
- Kappa Opioid Receptors Drive a Tonic Aversive Component of Chronic Pain. (42 citations)
- Manganese causes neurotoxic iron accumulation via translational repression of amyloid precursor protein and H-Ferritin. (36 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- Enzyme
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Opioid, Pharmacology, Amyloid precursor protein, Chronic pain and Opiate.
Her research integrates issues of Intensive care medicine and Anxiety in her study of Opioid.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Translation, Activator and Intracellular in addition to Pharmacology.
The Chronic pain study combines topics in areas such as Morphine, Conditioned place preference, Neuropathic pain and Dopamine receptor D1.
Her research investigates the connection between Dynorphin and topics such as Opioid overdose that intersect with problems in Neuroscience.
Her work carried out in the field of Neuroscience brings together such families of science as Learning memory and Nociception.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
