World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
20383
World Ranking
2597
National Ranking
68

Jim Lagopoulos publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Lagopoulos sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 348 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jim Lagopoulos D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Lagopoulos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim Lagopoulos is affiliated with the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, with notable contributions in several specialized subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, biological psychiatry, clinical psychology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's main topics of work cover a broad spectrum of areas within brain and mental health research. These include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Sleep and related disorders

Jim Lagopoulos has published research in a variety of scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group" (2020), Molecular Psychiatry
  • "ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing" (2020), Translational Psychiatry
  • "Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders" (2020), Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan" (2020), Human Brain Mapping
  • "Neuroimaging characteristics of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): a systematic review" (2020), Journal of Translational Medicine

Throughout their career, Jim Lagopoulos has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Daniel F. Hermens
  • Larisa T. McLoughlin
  • Paul Schwenn
  • Zack Shan
  • Adem Can

In addition to journal publications, Jim Lagopoulos has contributed to academic books. One notable publication is "Different Ways to Help Those With Mental Illness," published in 2020 by Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

    L Schmaal;D P Hibar;P G Sämann;G B Hall

  • Electrodermal activity

    Unknown

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth;Brendon Stubbs;Davy Vancampfort;Felipe Schuch

  • Smaller Hippocampal Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite ENIGMA-PGC Study: Subcortical Volumetry Results From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Consortia

    Mark W. Logue;Sanne J.H. van Rooij;Emily L. Dennis;Sarah L. Davis

  • Increased theta and alpha EEG activity during nondirective meditation.

    Jim Lagopoulos;Jian Xu;Inge Rasmussen;Alexandra Vik

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Structural Volumes in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Daniel C.M. O'Doherty;Kate M. Chitty;Sonia Saddiqui;Maxwell R. Bennett

  • Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording.

    Leanne M. Williams;Mary L. Phillips;Michael J. Brammer;David Skerrett

  • A systematic review of resting-state functional-MRI studies in major depression

    L Wang;D F Hermens;I B Hickie;Jim Lagopoulos

  • A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression.

    Colleen K. Loo;Perminder Sachdev;Donel Martin;Melissa Pigot

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years

    Sophia Frangou;Amirhossein Modabbernia;Steven C. R. Williams;Efstathios Papachristou

  • Diffuse axonal injury in severe traumatic brain injury visualized using high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging.

    Jian Xu;Inge-Andre Rasmussen;Jim Lagopoulos;Asta Håberg

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies in children with autism spectrum disorders

    Eleni A Papagiannopoulou;Kate M Chitty;Daniel F Hermens;Ian B Hickie

  • Stress-Induced Grey Matter Loss Determined by MRI Is Primarily Due to Loss of Dendrites and Their Synapses

    Mustafa S Kassem;Jim Lagopoulos;Timothy J Stait-Gardner;William S Price

  • Stress and trauma: BDNF control of dendritic-spine formation and regression

    M.R. Bennett;J. Lagopoulos

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • An emotional Stroop functional MRI study of euthymic bipolar disorder

    Gin S Malhi;Jim Lagopoulos;Jim Lagopoulos;Jim Lagopoulos;Perminder S Sachdev;Perminder S Sachdev;Belinda Ivanovski;Belinda Ivanovski

  • Cognitive generation of affect in bipolar depression: an fMRI study.

    Gin S. Malhi;Gin S. Malhi;Jim Lagopoulos;Jim Lagopoulos;Philip B. Ward;Veena Kumari

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.

    Jodie Marquez;Paulette van Vliet;Patrick McElduff;Jim Lagopoulos

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Daniel F. Hermens
Daniel F. Hermens University of the Sunshine Coast
Gin S Malhi
Gin S Malhi University of Sydney
Sharon L. Naismith
Sharon L. Naismith University of Sydney
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Max R. Bennett
Max R. Bennett University of Sydney
Neda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad University of Southern California
Henrik Walter
Henrik Walter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Lianne Schmaal
Lianne Schmaal University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens up a range of online education options and potential career paths in the health sciences, technology, and research sectors. Many students search for accelerated bachelors programs so they can enter the workforce sooner, especially as demand grows for neuroscience professionals. These flexible programs allow learners to fast-track their studies while balancing work and family commitments.

Given the investment of both time and money, it’s important to consider which academic paths rank among the highest paid degrees and the most lucrative college majors. Neuroscience connects with fields such as biomedical engineering, computer science, and psychology, all of which are known for strong salary prospects and career advancement opportunities.

For students watching their budget, there are cheap online colleges that accept fafsa, making it easier to afford a degree and minimize debt. Researching these options can help you find accredited and affordable programs that set a strong foundation for a future in neuroscience or a related field.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Lagopoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles