World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2216 2019 1291 1149 184 44867

Richard G. Tedeschi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard G. Tedeschi between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard G. Tedeschi published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2018. 12 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2018. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 9 publications
1975 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard G. Tedeschi: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 4
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 9
1996 2
1997 0
1998 7
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 13
2005 3
2006 7
2007 5
2008 3
2009 4
2010 11
2011 5
2012 18
2013 9
2014 4
2015 10
2016 8
2017 9
2018 24
2019 2
2020 2
2021 6
2022 6
2023 4
2024 3
2025 9
Total 206
Download as CSV

Richard G. Tedeschi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 184
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard G. Tedeschi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Tedeschi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard G. Tedeschi is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology. Their research encompasses various aspects of trauma, resilience, and posttraumatic growth.

The scientist has published 37 works in psychology, with subfields including clinical psychology (29 publications), applied psychology (5), developmental and educational psychology (3), pediatrics, perinatology and child health (3), and general health professions (2). Their research topics cover:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout

Richard G. Tedeschi has coauthored research frequently with Kanako Taku, Doris Kehl, Bret A. Moore, Taryn Greene, and Gary Elkins.

The scientist's work has appeared in several publication venues, among them:

  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (2 publications)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (2 publications)
  • Personality and Individual Differences (1 publication)
  • Journal of Psychotherapy Integration (1 publication)
  • Chinese Journal of Traumatology (1 publication)

Notable papers include:

  • "Posttraumatic growth as an integrative therapeutic philosophy." (2020), Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
  • "The post-traumatic growth approach to psychological trauma" (2023), World Psychiatry
  • "Posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across ten countries: Global validation of the PTG-PTD theoretical model" (2020), Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Shared trauma, resilience, and growth: A roadmap toward transcultural conceptualization." (2021), Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Coping and rumination as predictors of posttraumatic growth and depreciation" (2022), Chinese Journal of Traumatology

Best Publications

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma.

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Target Article: "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence".

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic growth : positive changes in the aftermath of crisis

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Crystal L. Park;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Trauma and Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • The Foundations of Posttraumatic Growth: An Expanded Framework

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • A correlational test of the relationship between posttraumatic growth, religion, and cognitive processing.

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi;Jamie McMillan

  • Handbook of posttraumatic growth : research and practice

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kanako Taku

  • Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Kelli N. Triplett

  • Posttraumatic growth after war: a study with former refugees and displaced people in Sarajevo.

    Steve Powell;Rita Rosner;Willi Butollo;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Posttraumatic Growth, Meaning in Life, and Life Satisfaction in Response to Trauma

    Kelli Nicole Triplett;Richard G. Tedeschi;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Issues

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Crystal L. Park;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • The Posttraumatic Growth Model: Sociocultural Considerations

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Arnie Cann;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SELF‐REPORTED POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Tanya Vishnevsky;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • The factor structure of the posttraumatic growth inventory: A comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis

    Kanako Taku;Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth in Psychotherapy

    Debora Arnold;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard Tedeschi;Arnie Cann

  • Facilitating Posttraumatic Growth: A Clinician's Guide

    Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • The Core Beliefs Inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world.

    Arnie Cann;Lawrence G. Calhoun;Richard G. Tedeschi;Ryan P. Kilmer

  • An Exploratory Study of Posttraumatic Growth in Children Following a Natural Disaster

    Cheryl H. Cryder;Ryan P. Kilmer;Richard G. Tedeschi;Lawrence G. Calhoun

  • Assessing Strengths, Resilience, and Growth to Guide Clinical Interventions.

    Richard G. Tedeschi;Ryan P. Kilmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence G. Calhoun
Lawrence G. Calhoun University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Arnie Cann
Arnie Cann University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Isabel Leal
Isabel Leal ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Samuel M. Y. Ho
Samuel M. Y. Ho City University of Hong Kong
Rita Rosner
Rita Rosner Catholic University of America
Lisa G. Aspinwall
Lisa G. Aspinwall University of Utah
Nancy E. Avis
Nancy E. Avis Wake Forest University
Adam W. Hanley
Adam W. Hanley Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. One rapidly growing area is substance abuse counseling, which requires a blend of psychological knowledge, empathy, and specialized training. The path to becoming a counselor can differ depending on state and city requirements, so it’s important to understand the educational expectations in your desired location.

For example, aspiring professionals can learn about Santa Ana substance abuse counselors education requirements to see what qualifications are needed in Southern California. If you’re interested in Arizona, reviewing substance abuse counselor requirements in Scottsdale can provide specific details on local standards.

On the West Coast, Seattle substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight advanced degree preferences and the licensure process. Similarly, you can explore what professionals need to know about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Spokane. Each region has unique pathways, but most counseling careers require a psychology-related degree, specialized certificates, and supervised experience.

With the rise of flexible online psychology programs, meeting these requirements is more accessible than ever, helping you align your education with your chosen career path.

Best Scientists Citing Richard G. Tedeschi

Trending Scientists