World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 34 886 883 146 145 99 3512
Psychology 37 9292 8687 4913 4476 95 4268

Adam W. Hanley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam W. Hanley between 2012 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam W. Hanley published across 15 years, from 2012 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 16 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 3 publications
2012 2026

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam W. Hanley: publications per year, 2012 to 2026
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 0
2014 3
2015 8
2016 2
2017 8
2018 7
2019 10
2020 16
2021 16
2022 16
2023 11
2024 10
2025 13
2026 3
Total 124
Download as CSV

Adam W. Hanley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam W. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam W. Hanley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam W. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Adam W. Hanley is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology within these domains.

Their published work covers several subfields including Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. The topics addressed frequently include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Additionally, they explore Pain Management and Placebo Effect, Music Therapy and Health, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, and the relationship between Urban Green Space and Health.

Hanley's frequent publication outlets include the following venues:

  • Mindfulness
  • Journal of Pain
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • Pain

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • Brief preoperative mind-body therapies for total joint arthroplasty patients: a randomized controlled trial, 2021, Pain
  • To be mindful of the breath or pain: Comparing two brief preoperative mindfulness techniques for total joint arthroplasty patients., 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Self-Transcendent States: Perceived Body Boundaries and Spatial Frames of Reference, 2020, Mindfulness

Another important publication where Hanley is a co-author is:

  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement vs Supportive Group Therapy for Co-occurring Opioid Misuse and Chronic Pain in Primary Care, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Eric L. Garland
  • Yoshio Nakamura
  • Joanna E. Bettmann
  • Justin Hudak
  • Brett Froeliger

Best Publications

  • State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal

    Eric L Garland;Adam Hanley;Norman A Farb;Brett E Froeliger

  • Six-year positive effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on mindfulness, coping and well-being in medical and psychology students; Results from a randomized controlled trial.

    Michael F. De Vibe;Ida Solhaug;Jan H Rosenvinge;Reidar Tyssen

  • Mind-Body Therapies for Opioid-Treated Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Eric L. Garland;Carrie E. Brintz;Adam W. Hanley;Eric J. Roseen;Eric J. Roseen

  • Holding the body in mind: Interoceptive awareness, dispositional mindfulness and psychological well-being.

    Adam W. Hanley;Wolf E. Mehling;Eric L. Garland

  • Associations Between Mindfulness, Psychological Well-Being, and Subjective Well-Being with Respect to Contemplative Practice

    Adam Hanley;Alia R Warner;Eric L. Garland

  • Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data

    Eric L. Garland;Eric L. Garland;Adam W. Hanley;Phillipe R. Goldin;James J. Gross

  • Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement reduces opioid misuse risk via analgesic and positive psychological mechanisms: A randomized controlled trial.

    Eric L Garland;Adam W Hanley;Michael R Riquino;Sarah E Reese

  • Dispositional Mindfulness Co-varies with Self-Reported Positive Reappraisal

    Adam W. Hanley;Eric L. Garland

  • Clarity of mind: Structural equation modeling of associations between dispositional mindfulness, self-concept clarity and psychological well-being.

    Adam W. Hanley;Eric L. Garland

  • Washing Dishes to Wash the Dishes: Brief Instruction in an Informal Mindfulness Practice

    Adam W. Hanley;Alia R. Warner;Vincent M. Dehili;Angela I. Canto

  • Mind the Gaps: Are Conclusions About Mindfulness Entirely Conclusive?

    Adam W. Hanley;Neil Abell;Debra S. Osborn;Alysia D. Roehrig

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Training and Hypnotic Suggestion for Acute Pain Relief in the Hospital Setting

    Eric L. Garland;Anne K. Baker;Paula Larsen;Michael R. Riquino

  • The Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment (NADA): New tools to assess nondual traits and states of consciousness occurring within and beyond the context of meditation.

    Adam W Hanley;Yoshio Nakamura;Eric L Garland

  • Relating dispositional mindfulness, contemplative practice, and positive reappraisal with posttraumatic cognitive coping, stress, and growth.

    Adam W. Hanley;Eric L. Garland;Richard G. Tedeschi

  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement remediates hedonic dysregulation in opioid users: Neural and affective evidence of target engagement

    Eric L. Garland;Rachel M. Atchley;Adam W. Hanley;Jon-Kar Zubieta

  • Mindfulness meditation in the treatment of substance use disorders and preventing future relapse: neurocognitive mechanisms and clinical implications

    Sarah E Priddy;Matthew O Howard;Adam W Hanley;Michael R Riquino

  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement reduces opioid craving among individuals with opioid use disorder and chronic pain in medication assisted treatment: Ecological momentary assessments from a stage 1 randomized controlled trial

    Eric L. Garland;Adam W. Hanley;Anna Kline;Nina A. Cooperman

  • A failure in mind: Dispositional mindfulness and positive reappraisal as predictors of academic self-efficacy following failure

    Adam W. Hanley;Mohammed H. Palejwala;Robert T. Hanley;Angela I. Canto

  • Cognitive and affective mechanisms linking trait mindfulness to craving among individuals in addiction recovery.

    Eric L. Garland;Amelia Roberts-Lewis;Karen Kelley;Christine Tronnier

  • The mindful personality: Associations between dispositional mindfulness and the Five Factor Model of personality

    Adam W. Hanley

  • The mindful personality: A meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective.

    Adam W. Hanley;Eric L. Garland

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric L. Garland
Eric L. Garland University of Utah
Matthew O. Howard
Matthew O. Howard University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Amit Bernstein
Amit Bernstein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jon Kar Zubieta
Jon Kar Zubieta University of Utah
Elizabeth A. Thomas
Elizabeth A. Thomas University of California, Irvine
Norman A. S. Farb
Norman A. S. Farb University of Toronto
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Simon B. Goldberg
Simon B. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Many students choose to further their studies with online degrees that boost their prospects in psychology and related fields. Completing courses in social science can lay a solid groundwork for understanding human behavior and society at large.

For those curious about advanced specializations, earning a master’s degree is a popular route. If you are interested in workplace dynamics and human resources, find out what jobs can you get with a masters in industrial organizational psychology. Alternatively, if you want to study societies and group interactions, discover the range of jobs with masters in sociology.

Psychology graduates are also equipped for diverse roles in healthcare, education, business, and research. Curious about your options? Learn more about what career can you do with a psychology degree and see how your education can guide your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Adam W. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles