World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5774 5368 64 62 97 29156
Neuroscience 48 6069 5586 146 136 97 29113

Todd A. Hare publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd A. Hare between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd A. Hare published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2021. 14 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2021. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2005 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd A. Hare: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 7
2012 2
2013 6
2014 8
2015 8
2016 0
2017 8
2018 6
2019 7
2020 7
2021 12
2022 3
2023 10
2024 5
2025 9
Total 118
Download as CSV

Todd A. Hare publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd A. Hare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Todd A. Hare D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd A. Hare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd A. Hare is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience. Todd's work crosses multiple subfields including general decision sciences, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as economics and econometrics.

The topics that Todd explores encompass neural and behavioral psychology studies, decision-making and behavioral economics, neural dynamics and brain function, behavioral health and interventions, functional brain connectivity studies, cognitive abilities and testing, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Todd A. Hare's recent publications in the field cover various aspects of decision-making and brain function. Notable papers include:

  • Humans primarily use model-based inference in the two-stage task, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Genetic underpinnings of risky behaviour relate to altered neuroanatomy, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Sensory perception relies on fitness-maximizing codes, 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Rethinking model-based and model-free influences on mental effort and striatal prediction errors, 2023, Nature Human Behaviour

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Todd include Philippe N. Tobler, Rafael Polanía, Micah Edelson, Carolina Feher da Silva, and Anjali Raja Beharelle.

Todd's research contributions have appeared predominantly in a set of key venues. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with seven publications, Nature Human Behaviour with five, Scientific Reports with two, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience with two, and Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience with two.

Best Publications

  • The Adolescent Brain

    B.J. Casey;Rebecca M. Jones;Todd A. Hare

  • The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants

    Nim Tottenham;James W. Tanaka;Andrew C. Leon;Thomas McCarry

  • Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system

    Todd A. Hare;Colin F. Camerer;Antonio Rangel

  • Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents.

    Adriana Galvan;Todd A Hare;Cindy E Parra;Jackie Penn

  • Biological substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation in adolescence during an emotional go-nogo task.

    Todd A. Hare;Nim Tottenham;Adriana Galvan;Henning U. Voss

  • Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation.

    Nim Tottenham;Todd A. Hare;Brian T. Quinn;Thomas W. McCarry

  • Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors

    Todd A. Hare;John P. O'Doherty;Colin F. Camerer;Wolfram Schultz

  • Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation.

    Dylan G. Gee;Laurel J. Gabard-Durnam;Jessica Flannery;Bonnie Goff

  • Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: who is at risk?

    Adriana Galvan;Todd Hare;Henning Voss;Gary Glover

  • A Developmental Shift from Positive to Negative Connectivity in Human Amygdala-Prefrontal Circuitry

    Dylan G. Gee;Kathryn L. Humphreys;Jessica Flannery;Bonnie Goff

  • Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice

    Antonio Rangel;Todd Hare

  • Value computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition.

    Todd A. Hare;Colin F. Camerer;Daniel T. Knoepfle;Antonio Rangel

  • Changes in cerebral functional organization during cognitive development

    BJ Casey;Adriana Galvan;Todd A Hare

  • Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents

    Leah H. Somerville;Todd Hare;B. J. Casey

  • Focusing Attention on the Health Aspects of Foods Changes Value Signals in vmPFC and Improves Dietary Choice

    Todd A. Hare;Jonathan Malmaud;Antonio Rangel

  • Elevated amygdala response to faces following early deprivation

    N. Tottenham;T.A. Hare;A. Millner;T. Gilhooly

  • Contributions of amygdala and striatal activity in emotion regulation.

    Todd A. Hare;Nim Tottenham;Nim Tottenham;Matthew C. Davidson;Gary H. Glover

  • Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice

    Todd A. Hare;Wolfram Schultz;Colin F. Camerer;John P. O'Doherty

  • Behavioral Assessment of Emotion Discrimination, Emotion Regulation, and Cognitive Control in Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood

    Nim Tottenham;Nim Tottenham;Todd A Hare;B.J. Casey

  • Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference

    Ian Krajbich;Ian Krajbich;Björn Bartling;Todd Hare;Ernst Fehr

  • The Development of Human Amygdala Functional Connectivity at Rest from 4 to 23 Years: a cross-sectional study

    Laurel J. Gabard-Durnam;Jessica Flannery;Bonnie Goff;Dylan G. Gee

Frequent Co-Authors

B. J. Casey
B. J. Casey Barnard College
Nim Tottenham
Nim Tottenham Columbia University
Antonio Rangel
Antonio Rangel California Institute of Technology
Christian C. Ruff
Christian C. Ruff University of Zurich
Adriana Galván
Adriana Galván University of California, Los Angeles
Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Ernst Fehr
Ernst Fehr University of Zurich
Philippe N. Tobler
Philippe N. Tobler University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and certification programs that can launch or enhance your career. For those seeking flexible learning, there are certificates online that can offer specialized skills and excellent earning potential in related fields such as research, healthcare administration, and technology.

If you are looking for accessible entry points into the field, you might consider some of the easiest online degrees, covering foundational topics in psychology, biology, or health sciences. These degrees can help you build the groundwork for more advanced study.

Affordability is another key consideration. Those interested in social work aspects linked to neuroscience, like mental health or therapy, could benefit from cheap online msw programs. For those aiming to work in applied behavioral analysis, look for bcba certification programs, which are essential for careers in behavior therapy and intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Todd A. Hare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles