World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5309
World Ranking
10345
National Ranking
648

Corina Sas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corina Sas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 182 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Corina Sas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corina Sas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Corina Sas is a researcher affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom, focusing primarily on the field of psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, human-computer interaction, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas, particularly in digital mental health interventions, innovative human-technology interaction, and the impact of technology on adolescents. Other key topics include mobile health and mHealth applications, heart rate variability and autonomic control, mental health research topics, and mindfulness and compassion interventions.

Corina Sas has contributed to numerous publications in prominent academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Electronic workshops in computing
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Their recent papers are representative of the interdisciplinary nature of their work. These include:

  • "Technology Acceptance in Mobile Health: Scoping Review of Definitions, Models, and Measurement" (2020), Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "The need for change: Understanding emotion regulation antecedents and consequences using ecological momentary assessment" (2020), Emotion
  • "HRV and Stress: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Comparison of Wearable Heart Rate Sensors for Biofeedback" (2021), IEEE Access
  • "Exploring the Design Space for Human-Food-Technology Interaction: An Approach from the Lens of Eating Experiences" (2022), ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Evaluation of Treatment Descriptions and Alignment With Clinical Guidance of Apps for Depression on App Stores: Systematic Search and Content Analysis" (2020), JMIR Formative Research

Throughout their career, Corina Sas has collaborated frequently with a range of coauthors, including:

  • Gavin Doherty
  • Dionne Bowie-DaBreo
  • Camille Nadal
  • Hristo Valev
  • Tim Leufkens

Best Publications

  • Exploring the facebook experience: a new approach to usability

    Jennefer Hart;Charlene Ridley;Faisal Taher;Corina Sas

  • Technology Acceptance in Mobile Health: Scoping Review of Definitions, Models, and Measurement.

    Camille Nadal;Corina Sas;Gavin Doherty

  • Presence equation: an investigation into cognitive factors underlying presence

    Corina Sas;Gregory M. P. O'Hare

  • HCI and Affective Health: Taking stock of a decade of studies and charting future research directions

    Pedro Sanches;Axel Janson;Pavel Karpashevich;Camille Nadal

  • Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup

    Corina Sas;Steve Whittaker

  • Human Factors of Wayfinding in Navigation

    D.R. Montello;Corina Sas

  • Public Ubiquitous Computing Systems: Lessons from the e-Campus Display Deployments

    O. Storz;A. Friday;N. Davies;J. Finney

  • Exploring bluetooth based mobile phone interaction with the hermes photo display

    Keith Cheverst;Alan Dix;Daniel Fitton;Chris Kray

  • Design for Trust: An Exploration of the Challenges and Opportunities of Bitcoin Users

    Corina Sas;Irni Eliana Khairuddin

  • Generating implications for design through design research

    Corina Sas;Steve Whittaker;Steven Dow;Jodi Forlizzi

  • MeditAid: a wearable adaptive neurofeedback-based system for training mindfulness state

    Corina Sas;Rohit Chopra

  • Introduction to this special issue on designing for personal memories: past, present and future

    Elise van den Hoven;Corina Sas;Steve Whittaker

  • The need for change: Understanding emotion regulation antecedents and consequences using ecological momentary assessment.

    Desirée Colombo;Javier Fernández-Álvarez;Carlos Suso-Ribera;Pietro Cipresso

  • Evaluating Mindfulness Meditation Apps

    Claudia Daudén Roquet;Corina Sas

  • HRV and Stress: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Comparison of Wearable Heart Rate Sensors for Biofeedback

    Muhammad Umair;Niaz Chalabianloo;Corina Sas;Cem Ersoy

  • Design for Rituals of Letting Go: An Embodiment Perspective on Disposal Practices Informed by Grief Therapy

    Corina Sas;Steve Whittaker;John Zimmerman

  • Exploring Issues of User Model Transparency and Proactive Behaviour in an Office Environment Control System

    Keith Cheverst;Hee Eon Byun;Dan Fitton;Corina Sas

  • Exploring Trust in Bitcoin Technology: A Framework for HCI Research

    Corina Sas;Irni Eliana Khairuddin

  • Security and Privacy Implications of Pervasive Memory Augmentation

    Nigel Davies;Adrian Friday;Sarah Clinch;Corina Sas

  • Functionality of Top-Rated Mobile Apps for Depression: Systematic Search and Evaluation.

    Chengcheng Qu;Corina Sas;Claudia Daudén Roquet;Gavin Doherty

  • AffectCam: arousal- augmented sensecam for richer recall of episodic memories

    Corina Sas;Tomasz Fratczak;Matthew Rees;Hans Gellersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Dix
Alan Dix Swansea University
Gregory M. P. O'Hare
Gregory M. P. O'Hare Trinity College Dublin
Gavin Doherty
Gavin Doherty Trinity College Dublin
Nigel Davies
Nigel Davies Lancaster University
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Keith Cheverst
Keith Cheverst Lancaster University
Steve Whittaker
Steve Whittaker University of California, Santa Cruz
Cem Ersoy
Cem Ersoy Boğaziçi University
Kristina Höök
Kristina Höök Royal Institute of Technology
Adrian Friday
Adrian Friday Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and specialized career pathways. For example, those interested in sustainability can explore an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online. This degree blends environmental science and technology, leading to roles in water management, renewable energy, and environmental consulting.

Another popular pathway is the online mechanical engineering degree. Graduates gain skills in design and manufacturing, qualifying for careers in aerospace, automotive, robotics, and more.

Students with a passion for scientific inquiry and mathematics may consider online physics degrees. This area lays strong groundwork for research, technology development, and teaching careers.

Finally, there is growing demand for expertise in data analysis and artificial intelligence. Earning one of the many data science degrees available online can lead to roles in finance, healthcare, tech, and beyond.

Each of these flexible online degree programs represents a strategic way to expand your skillset and access fast-growing fields related to computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Corina Sas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles