World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
43
Citations
9588
World Ranking
1407
National Ranking
596

Thomas J. Goldsby publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Goldsby sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 108 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Thomas J. Goldsby D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Goldsby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Goldsby is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Business, Management, and Accounting, with a notable emphasis on several specialized subfields.

The scientist's work spans the following subfields:

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Information Systems
  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Their research covers multiple topics, including:

  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

Thomas J. Goldsby has contributed to publications in several frequently appearing academic venues, such as:

  • Journal of Business Logistics
  • International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
  • Production and Operations Management
  • European Journal of Management Studies
  • Transportation Journal

Recent papers authored by or involving Thomas J. Goldsby include:

  • The triple-a supply chain and strategic resources: developing competitive advantage, 2020, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
  • Everything Old is New Again: The Age of Consumer-Centric Supply Chain Management, 2020, Journal of Business Logistics
  • When preemptive risk mitigation is insufficient: The effectiveness of continuity and resilience techniques during COVID-19, 2022, Production and Operations Management
  • A Challenge in Our Time: Issues of Race in Supply Chain Management, 2020, Journal of Business Logistics
  • Global Supply Chains: Globalization Research in a Changing World, 2020, Journal of Business Logistics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Thomas J. Goldsby include:

  • Walter Zinn
  • Theodore P. Stank
  • Terry L. Esper
  • Anne E. Dohmen
  • Jason R. W. Merrick

Best Publications

  • Supply chain risks: a review and typology

    Shashank Rao;Thomas J. Goldsby

  • LOGISTICS SERVICE PERFORMANCE: ESTIMATING ITS INFLUENCE ON MARKET SHARE

    Theodore P. Stank;Thomas J. Goldsby;Shawnee K. Vickery;Katrina Savitskie

  • MODELING LEAN, AGILE, AND LEAGILE SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGIES

    Thomas J. Goldsby;Stanley E. Griffis;Anthony S. Roath

  • Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast food industry

    Theodore P Stank;Thomas J Goldsby;Shawnee K Vickery

  • Information technology influences on world class logistics capability

    David J. Closs;Thomas J. Goldsby;Steven R. Clinton

  • WEB‐BASED AND MAIL SURVEYS: A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE, DATA, AND COST

    Stanley E Griffis;Thomas J Goldsby;Martha C Cooper

  • A unified model of supply chain agility : the work-design perspective

    Xun Li;Chen Chung;Thomas J. Goldsby;Clyde W. Holsapple

  • Lean Six Sigma Logistics: Strategic Development to Operational Success

    Thomas Goldsby;Robert Martichenko

  • The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis

    Stanley E. Griffis;Shashank Rao;Thomas J. Goldsby;Tarikere T. Niranjan

  • A framework for transportation decision making in an integrated supply chain

    Theodore P. Stank;Thomas J. Goldsby

  • The Performance Implications of Media Richness in a Business-to-Business Service Environment: Direct Versus Indirect Effects

    Shawnee K. Vickery;Cornelia Droge;Theodore P. Stank;Thomas J. Goldsby

  • Supply chain agility: scale development

    Xun Li;Thomas J. Goldsby;Clyde W. Holsapple

  • Electronic logistics service quality (e-LSQ): Its impact on the customer's purchase satisfaction and retention

    Shashank Rao;Thomas J. Goldsby;Stanley E. Griffis;Deepak Iyengar

  • Failure to deliver? Linking online order fulfillment glitches with future purchase behavior

    Shashank Rao;Stanley E. Griffis;Thomas J. Goldsby

  • Grocery Industry Collaboration in the Wake of ECR

    Robert Frankel;Thomas J. Goldsby;Judith M. Whipple

  • Extending total life-cycle thinking to sustainable supply chain design

    Fazleena Badurdeen;Deepak Iyengar;Thomas J. Goldsby;Haritha Metta

  • WORLD CLASS LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE LOGISTICS PRACTICES

    T J Goldsby;T P Stank

  • Using activity‐based costing to reengineer the reverse logistics channel

    Thomas J. Goldsby;David J. Closs

  • BEYOND EXPECTATIONS: AN EXAMINATION OF LOGISTICS OUTSOURCING GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND GOAL EXCEEDANCE

    Jan M. Deepen;Thomas J. Goldsby;A. Michael Knemeyer;Carl Marcus Wallenburg

  • Third‐Party Logistics: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Investigation of its Impact on Performance

    Rudolf Leuschner;Craig R. Carter;Thomas J. Goldsby;Zachary S. Rogers

  • An empirical examination of firm financial performance along dimensions of supply chain resilience

    Xun Li;Qun Wu;Clyde W. Holsapple;Thomas Goldsby

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Michael Knemeyer
A. Michael Knemeyer The Ohio State University
Theodore P. Stank
Theodore P. Stank University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Chad W. Autry
Chad W. Autry University of Tennessee at Knoxville
David J. Closs
David J. Closs Michigan State University
Clyde W. Holsapple
Clyde W. Holsapple University of Kentucky
I.S. Jawahir
I.S. Jawahir University of Kentucky
Shawnee K. Vickery
Shawnee K. Vickery Michigan State University
Craig R. Carter
Craig R. Carter Arizona State University
Terry L. Esper
Terry L. Esper The Ohio State University
Clay M. Voorhees
Clay M. Voorhees University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering advancing your studies in business, there’s a growing range of flexible and accredited options online. Pursuing an affordable master's degree can be an excellent way to boost your credentials without incurring heavy debt. Many reputable institutions now offer robust online courses tailored for working professionals.

With businesses increasingly relying on data, a master online data science can open doors to roles in analytics, consulting, and management. Those aspiring to executive or academic positions may also consider a phd organizational leadership, which focuses on advanced leadership theory and practice.

Always ensure your chosen program is from one of the recognized online degrees accredited institutions. Accreditation guarantees that your degree meets high standards, making it more respected by employers and ensuring eligibility for professional certifications and further studies.

Online degrees enable you to study at your own pace and align your education with evolving career pathways in today’s dynamic business landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Goldsby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles