| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business and Management | 61 | 504 | 469 | 73 | 63 | 306 | 14934 |
| Engineering and Technology | 61 | 2023 | 1929 | 132 | 121 | 302 | 14872 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Mohamed Mohamed Naim between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mohamed Mohamed Naim published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2007. 17 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.
335 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 9 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 4 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 7 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 12 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 7 |
| 2002 | 9 |
| 2003 | 10 |
| 2004 | 13 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2007 | 23 |
| 2008 | 19 |
| 2009 | 14 |
| 2010 | 19 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2012 | 10 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2014 | 15 |
| 2015 | 9 |
| 2016 | 15 |
| 2017 | 13 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2019 | 10 |
| 2020 | 5 |
| 2021 | 8 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 9 |
| 2024 | 8 |
| 2025 | 9 |
| Total | 335 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Mohamed Naim sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 306 publications — 92nd percentile
92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 35–39 | 2 | |
| 40–44 | 2 | |
| 45–49 | 5 | |
| 50–54 | 20 | |
| 55–59 | 39 | |
| 60–64 | 66 | |
| 65–69 | 52 | |
| 70–74 | 80 | |
| 75–79 | 83 | |
| 80–84 | 116 | |
| 85–89 | 94 | |
| 90–94 | 111 | |
| 95–99 | 122 | |
| 100–104 | 104 | |
| 105–109 | 113 | |
| 110–114 | 96 | |
| 115–119 | 97 | |
| 120–124 | 112 | |
| 125–129 | 93 | |
| 130–134 | 79 | |
| 135–139 | 69 | |
| 140–144 | 80 | |
| 145–149 | 81 | |
| 150–154 | 85 | |
| 155–159 | 50 | |
| 160–164 | 74 | |
| 165–169 | 61 | |
| 170–174 | 40 | |
| 175–179 | 44 | |
| 180–184 | 47 | |
| 185–189 | 59 | |
| 190–194 | 35 | |
| 195–199 | 37 | |
| 200–204 | 49 | |
| 205–209 | 48 | |
| 210–214 | 34 | |
| 215–219 | 31 | |
| 220–224 | 37 | |
| 225–229 | 34 | |
| 230–234 | 25 | |
| 235–239 | 28 | |
| 240–244 | 34 | |
| 245–249 | 28 | |
| 250–254 | 23 | |
| 255–259 | 22 | |
| 260–264 | 11 | |
| 265–269 | 16 | |
| 270–274 | 23 | |
| 275–279 | 12 | |
| 280–284 | 16 | |
| 285–289 | 10 | |
| 290–294 | 12 | |
| 295–299 | 12 | |
| 300–304 | 8 | |
| 305–309 | 13 | 306 |
| 310–314 | 13 | |
| 315–319 | 6 | |
| 320–324 | 10 | |
| 325–329 | 9 | |
| 330–334 | 7 | |
| 335–339 | 10 | |
| 340–344 | 10 | |
| 345–349 | 7 | |
| 350–354 | 4 | |
| 355–359 | 10 | |
| 360–364 | 3 | |
| 365–369 | 7 | |
| 370–374 | 2 | |
| 375–379 | 8 | |
| 380–384 | 4 | |
| 385–389 | 5 | |
| 390–394 | 5 | |
| 395–399 | 2 | |
| 400–404 | 2 | |
| 405–409 | 4 | |
| 410–414 | 3 | |
| 415–419 | 2 | |
| 420–424 | 5 | |
| 425–429 | 3 | |
| 430–434 | 1 | |
| 435 | 1 | |
| 436+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Mohamed Naim sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 61 D-Index — 84th percentile
84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 156 | |
| 31 | 159 | |
| 32 | 171 | |
| 33 | 161 | |
| 34 | 135 | |
| 35 | 124 | |
| 36 | 114 | |
| 37 | 111 | |
| 38 | 103 | |
| 39 | 89 | |
| 40 | 81 | |
| 41 | 97 | |
| 42 | 80 | |
| 43 | 69 | |
| 44 | 68 | |
| 45 | 63 | |
| 46 | 54 | |
| 47 | 69 | |
| 48 | 50 | |
| 49 | 58 | |
| 50 | 54 | |
| 51 | 62 | |
| 52 | 54 | |
| 53 | 43 | |
| 54 | 49 | |
| 55 | 35 | |
| 56 | 40 | |
| 57 | 44 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 29 | |
| 60 | 48 | |
| 61 | 32 | 61 |
| 62 | 30 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 22 | |
| 65 | 19 | |
| 66 | 20 | |
| 67 | 18 | |
| 68 | 17 | |
| 69 | 21 | |
| 70 | 20 | |
| 71 | 19 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 10 | |
| 74 | 16 | |
| 75 | 24 | |
| 76 | 13 | |
| 77 | 19 | |
| 78 | 8 | |
| 79 | 6 | |
| 80 | 4 | |
| 81 | 12 | |
| 82 | 7 | |
| 83 | 7 | |
| 84 | 6 | |
| 85 | 10 | |
| 86 | 4 | |
| 87 | 11 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89+ | 96 |
Mohamed Mohamed Naim is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has contributed significantly to research in business, management, and engineering. Their work spans several subfields, including management information systems, strategy and management, management science and operations research, management of technology and innovation, and emergency medicine.
Their research encompasses main topics such as quality and supply management, product development and customization, construction project management and performance, sustainable supply chain management, supply chain and inventory management, supply chain resilience and risk management, and innovation and knowledge management.
Notable recent papers by Mohamed Mohamed Naim include:
Their frequent co-authors include:
Mohamed Mohamed Naim has been published multiple times in several key journals, such as:
Their areas of expertise reflect a diverse engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of supply chain management and operational research. The combination of publications, co-authorships, and topics reveals a research profile centered on improving supply chain systems, addressing risks and uncertainties, and exploring innovative approaches in logistics and operations management.
J. Ben Naylor;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Danny Berry
D.R. Towill;M.M. Naim;J. Wikner
Jonathan Gosling;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
J Wikner;Denis Royston Towill;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
Virginia L. M. Spiegler;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Joakim Wikner
John Simon;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Denis Royston Towill
Jonathan Gosling;Laura Purvis;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
Stephen Michael Disney;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Andrew Thomas Potter
James Barlow;Paul Childerhouse;David Gann;Séverine Hong-Minh
Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Stephen Michael Disney;Denis Royston Towill
Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Andrew Thomas Potter;Robert John Mason;Nicola Ann Bateman
Irina Harris;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Andrew Palmer;Andrew Thomas Potter
Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Jonathan Gosling
Vasco Augusto Sanchez Rodrigues;Damian Stantchev;Andrew Thomas Potter;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
Laura Purvis;Jonathan Gosling;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
Irina Harris;Christine Lesley Mumford;Mohamed Mohamed Naim
Vasco Sanchez‐Rodrigues;Andrew Potter;Mohamed M. Naim
Mohamed Mohamed Naim;James Barlow
M. M. Naim;P. Childerhouse;S. M. Disney;D. R. Towill
Stephen Michael Disney;Mohamed Mohamed Naim;Denis Royston Towill
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Studying Business and Management in the USA opens doors to a range of versatile online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue specialized fields to boost their employability and adapt to evolving market trends.
For those interested in finance, exploring the affordable online accounting degree options can lead to stable and high-demand roles. Meanwhile, technology-driven professionals may want to consider the best ai masters programs online, which are increasingly important as AI transforms modern business.
If you are drawn to infrastructure and development, the best online construction management degree options prepare graduates for leadership roles in a growing industry. Aspiring executives can look into the affordable online executive mba programs, ideal for advancing into senior management positions without stepping away from current careers.
Exploring these related pathways can help you tailor your business education to your interests and the marketplace’s needs, making your degree even more valuable.
Grenoble Alpes University
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Lancaster University
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Flinders University
National Institutes of Health
Griffith University
University of Edinburgh
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Tsinghua University
Zhejiang University of Technology
University of Freiburg
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
University of Sussex
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Cardiff University
