World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
69
Citations
19360
World Ranking
326
National Ranking
153

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
19212
World Ranking
2078
National Ranking
1051

Clyde W. Holsapple publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clyde W. Holsapple sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 267 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Clyde W. Holsapple D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clyde W. Holsapple sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Overview

Clyde W. Holsapple is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Decision Sciences, with specific attention to subfields such as Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, and Information Systems and Management.

The main topics covered in their work include Innovation and Knowledge Management, Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management, Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Construction Project Management and Performance, Information Technology Governance and Strategy, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, and Digital Platforms and Economics.

Recent publications by Holsapple include the following:

  • "Enduring buyer-supplier relationship and buyer performance: the mediating role of buyer-supplier dyadic embeddedness and supplier external embeddedness" (2022), published in the European Journal of Management Studies
  • "Recovering Troubled IT Projects: The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Project Complexity" (2020), published in Information Systems Frontiers
  • "National culture, online medium type, and first impression bias" (2020), published in the Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • European Journal of Management Studies
  • Information Systems Frontiers
  • Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

Clyde W. Holsapple collaborates regularly with several researchers, including Xiang Fang, T. M. Rajkumar, Xun Li, Qun Wu, and Thomas J. Goldsby.

Holsapple has received recognition such as the ACM Senior Member award in 2013 and is acknowledged as a Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute.

Best Publications

  • Foundations of Decision Support Systems

    Robert H. Bonczek;Clyde W. Holsapple;Andrew B. Whinston

  • AN INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE IN ORGANIZATIONS

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Kshiti D. Joshi

  • The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Meenu Singh

  • Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-Based Approach

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Andrew B. Whinston

  • A collaborative approach to ontology design

    Clyde W. Holsapple;K. D. Joshi

  • Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E-Learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective*

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Anita Lee-Post

  • Organizational knowledge resources

    C. W. Holsapple;K. D. Joshi

  • A unified foundation for business analytics

    Clyde Holsapple;Anita Lee-Post;Ram Pakath

  • Knowledge management: A threefold framework

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Kshiti D. Joshi

  • Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations

    Frada Burstein;Clyde W. Holsapple

  • Handbook on knowledge management 1 : knowledge matters

    Clyde W Holsapple

  • A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Kshiti D. Joshi

  • Description and analysis of existing knowledge management frameworks

    C.W. Holsapple;K.D. Joshi

  • ERP plans and decision-support benefits

    Clyde W. Holsapple;Mark P. Sena

  • A unified model of supply chain agility : the work-design perspective

    Xun Li;Chen Chung;Thomas J. Goldsby;Clyde W. Holsapple

  • Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study

    C. W. Holsapple;K. D. Joshi

  • Handbook on knowledge management

    Clyde W. Holsapple

  • THE EVOLVING ROLES OF MODELS IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS

    Robert H. Bonczek;Clyde W. Holsapple;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1

    Frada Burstein;Clyde W. Holsapple

  • Electronic commerce: Building blocks of new business opportunity

    Lynda M. Applegate;Clyde W. Holsapple;Ravi Kalakota;Franz Josef Radermacher

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew B. Whinston
Andrew B. Whinston The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas J. Goldsby
Thomas J. Goldsby University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Daniel E. O'Leary
Daniel E. O'Leary University of Southern California
H. Raghav Rao
H. Raghav Rao The University of Texas at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up diverse pathways for those interested in business and management careers. With flexible schedules, students can now access quality programs without sacrificing work or personal commitments.

Many prospective managers opt for best online construction management degree programs. These are ideal for individuals looking to advance in the growing construction sector. Similarly, the healthcare industry is rapidly expanding, and an online healthcare management degree equips students to meet the unique challenges of managing medical facilities and leading healthcare teams.

For those in a hurry to launch or elevate their careers, there are fast track school programs that enable quicker completion times, getting you into the workforce sooner.

Finally, affordability matters. By researching the business schools online, students can find degrees that fit their budgets.

No matter which business or management niche you pursue, the flexibility and variety offered by these online degrees can help pave the way for a successful and dynamic career.

Best Scientists Citing Clyde W. Holsapple

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles