World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Corinna E. Löckenhoff

Corinna E. Löckenhoff

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7496
World Ranking
8782
National Ranking
4675

Corinna E. Löckenhoff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corinna E. Löckenhoff sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Corinna E. Löckenhoff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corinna E. Löckenhoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Corinna E. Löckenhoff is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and specializes in psychology with a particular focus on aging and gerontology research. Their work covers a broad spectrum within psychology, including subfields such as neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, and general decision sciences.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Corinna E. Löckenhoff has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals, featuring prominently in the following publication venues:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade)
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Perceptions of Aging Across 26 Cultures and Their Culture-Level Associates" (2021), published in Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade)
  • "The paradox of aging and health-related quality of life in Asian Chinese: results from the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan" (2020), published in BMC Geriatrics
  • "Changes in Personality Before and During Cognitive Impairment" (2023), published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • "The influence of verbatim versus gist formatting on younger and older adults' information acquisition and decision-making." (2022), published in Psychology and Aging
  • "Age Differences in Media Consumption and Avoidance With Respect to COVID-19" (2021), published in The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Julia Nolte
  • Antonio Terracciano
  • Yi Lu
  • Marleen De Bolle
  • Denis Gerstorf

Their work encompasses experimental and longitudinal studies addressing psychological mechanisms related to aging, health outcomes, cognitive function, and decision-making processes. This interdisciplinary approach integrates psychological theories with health sciences to investigate how aging influences well-being, cognitive abilities, and social perceptions across cultures.

Best Publications

  • Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, Aging, and Health: The Increasingly Delicate Balance Between Regulating Emotions and Making Tough Choices

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Five-Factor Model personality profiles of drug users

    Antonio Terracciano;Corinna E Löckenhoff;Rosa M Crum;O Joseph Bienvenu

  • Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Filip de Fruyt;Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. Mccrae

  • Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Richard D. Lane;Ron Wright

  • Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: motivational manipulations can reduce age differences.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Personality Across the Life Span

    Paul T. Costa;Robert R. McCrae;Corinna E. Löckenhoff

  • Personality predictors of longevity: Activity, Emotional Stability, and Conscientiousness

    Antonio Terracciano;Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Alan B. Zonderman;Luigi Ferrucci

  • Self-reported extremely adverse life events and longitudinal changes in five-factor model personality traits in an urban sample.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Antonio Terracciano;Nicholas S. Patriciu;William W. Eaton

  • Aging, emotion, and evolution: the bigger picture.

    Laura L. Carstensen;Corinna E. Löckenhoff

  • The emergence of sex differences in personality traits in early adolescence: A cross-sectional, cross-cultural study.

    Marleen De Bolle;Filip De Fruyt;Robert R McCrae;Corinna E Löckenhoff

  • Age Differences in Online Social Networking: Extending Socioemotional Selectivity Theory to Social Network Sites

    Pamara F. Chang;Yoon Hyung Choi;Natalya N. Bazarova;Corinna E. Löckenhoff

  • Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: universal and accurate?

    Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt;Lee Jussim

  • Gender Stereotypes of Personality Universal and Accurate

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Wayne Chan;Robert R. McCrae;Filip De Fruyt

  • Age differences in temporal discounting: the role of dispositional affect and anticipated emotions.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Ted O'Donoghue;David Dunning

  • Following your heart or your head: focusing on emotions versus information differentially influences the decisions of younger and older adults.

    Joseph A. Mikels;Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Sam J. Maglio;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Five-factor personality traits and subjective health among caregivers: the role of caregiver strain and self-efficacy.

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Paul R. Duberstein;Bruce Friedman;Paul T. Costa Jr.

  • Five-Factor Model Personality Traits and the Retirement Transition: Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Associations

    Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Antonio Terracciano;Paul T. Costa Jr.

  • Association between psychological interventions and chronic pain outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Bahar Niknejad;Ruth Bolier;Charles R. Henderson;Diana Delgado

  • A step toward DSM‐V: cataloguing personality‐related problems in living

    Robert R. McCrae;Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Paul T. Costa

  • Self-Regulation and the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits

    Robert R. McCrae;Corinna E. Löckenhoff

  • Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates

    Corinna Lockenhoff;Filip De Fruyt;Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. McCrae

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul T. Costa
Paul T. Costa Duke University
Antonio Terracciano
Antonio Terracciano Florida State University
Robert R. McCrae
Robert R. McCrae Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Jüri Allik
Jüri Allik University of Tartu
Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Lee Jussim
Lee Jussim Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Filip De Fruyt
Filip De Fruyt Ghent University
Anu Realo
Anu Realo University of Warwick
Jarret T. Crawford
Jarret T. Crawford College of New Jersey
Michelle Yik
Michelle Yik Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and rewarding career paths. Many students interested in psychology also explore opportunities in related fields like social work, counseling, or human services. Online degrees offer flexibility for those who need to balance education with work or family commitments.

Choosing the right online program is essential. Factors such as accreditation, tuition costs, and graduate success rates should all be considered. For example, you can explore some of the most valuable online social work degree programs in Connecticut or look at rankings for the most valuable online social work degree programs in Dubuque to find the right fit.

Students may also consider the best value online social work degrees in Indiana or examine the most valuable online social work programs in Kansas. These programs prepare graduates for impactful roles in healthcare, education, and community organizations, combining the foundations of psychology with practical skills to support individuals and families.

Best Scientists Citing Corinna E. Löckenhoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles