World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William M. Kelley

William M. Kelley

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
17358
World Ranking
4321
National Ranking
2410

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
17390
World Ranking
4626
National Ranking
2085

William M. Kelley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William M. Kelley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William M. Kelley is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on a range of research areas, although specific fields of study, subfields, and main research topics are not detailed in the available information.

The scientist has not been documented with recent papers, frequent co-authors, or consistent publication venues based on the current data. There are no records of book publications or awards attributed to William M. Kelley to date.

The absence of listed publications and research topics suggests limited publicly available bibliographic or citation data. However, affiliation with Dartmouth College indicates an active role within an academic institution that supports research activities.

Best Publications

  • Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study

    W. M. Kelley;C. N. Macrae;C. L. Wyland;S. Caglar

  • Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations

    Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Babatunde Adeyemo;Jeremy F. Huckins

  • Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding

    William M Kelley;Francis M Miezin;Kathleen B McDermott;Randy L Buckner

  • Medial Prefrontal Activity Predicts Memory for Self

    C. Neil Macrae;Joseph M. Moran;Todd F. Heatherton;Jane F. Banfield

  • Neuroanatomical Evidence for Distinct Cognitive and Affective Components of Self

    J. M. Moran;C. N. MacRae;T. F. Heatherton;C. L. Wyland

  • Sensitivity of the Action Observation Network to Physical and Observational Learning

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;David J. M. Kraemer;David J. M. Kraemer;Antonia F. de C. Hamilton;William M. Kelley

  • Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection.

    Leah H Somerville;Todd F Heatherton;William M Kelley

  • Frontal Cortex Contributes to Human Memory Formation

    Randy L. Buckner;William M. Kelley;Steven E. Petersen

  • Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others

    Todd F. Heatherton;Carrie L. Wyland;C. Neil Macrae;Kathryn E. Demos

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics

    Xi Nian Zuo;Jeffrey S. Anderson;Pierre Bellec;Rasmus M. Birn

  • Individual Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Activity to Food and Sexual Images Predict Weight Gain and Sexual Behavior

    Kathryn E. Demos;Todd F. Heatherton;William M. Kelley

  • Direct comparison of prefrontal cortex regions engaged by working and long-term memory tasks

    Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;William M. Kelley;Randy L. Buckner

  • Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness

    Jasmin Cloutier;Todd F. Heatherton;Paul J. Whalen;William M. Kelley

  • Human Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Indexes Hypervigilant Threat Monitoring

    Leah H. Somerville;Paul J. Whalen;William M. Kelley

  • Tracking Depression Dynamics in College Students Using Mobile Phone and Wearable Sensing

    Rui Wang;Weichen Wang;Alex daSilva;Jeremy F. Huckins

  • Neural correlates of humor detection and appreciation.

    Joseph M Moran;Gagan S Wig;Reginald B Adams;Petr Janata

  • Musical imagery: sound of silence activates auditory cortex.

    David J. M. Kraemer;C. Neil Macrae;C. Neil Macrae;Adam E. Green;William M. Kelley

  • Mike or me? Self-recognition in a split-brain patient

    David J. Turk;Todd F. Heatherton;William M. Kelley;Margaret G. Funnell

  • An Event-related fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Word Stem Completion

    Erica D. Palmer;Howard J. Rosen;Jeffrey G. Ojemann;Randy L. Buckner

  • Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming.

    Gagan S Wig;Scott T Grafton;Kathryn E Demos;William M Kelley

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional

    Randy L. Buckner;Vince D. Calhoun;F. Xavier Castellanos;Antao Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd F. Heatherton
Todd F. Heatherton Dartmouth College
C. Neil Macrae
C. Neil Macrae University of Aberdeen
Randy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner Harvard University
Steven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen Washington University in St. Louis
Leah H. Somerville
Leah H. Somerville Harvard University
James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
Neal J. Cohen
Neal J. Cohen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
Emily S. Cross
Emily S. Cross University of Glasgow
Andrew T. Campbell
Andrew T. Campbell Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience but prefer flexible study options, there are several online bachelor's degree choices that can serve as strong foundations. Many students begin with an undergraduate degree in psychology, biology, or a related field before advancing to specialized programs.

For those looking to blend neuroscience with clinical practice, online psyd clinical psychology programs offer advanced study in mental health and therapeutic interventions. These programs prepare graduates for licensure and careers as clinical psychologists, where an understanding of brain science is highly valuable.

If you are drawn to counseling and therapy, but want a fast-tracked option, consider marriage and family therapy programs online. These programs often include coursework on neurobiology and interpersonal dynamics, supporting diverse roles in mental health services.

When evaluating your education options, it’s important to explore salary prospects and career outcomes. Check out the best degree in the world list to see which undergraduate pathways align with high-paying and in-demand neuroscience-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing William M. Kelley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles