World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
39091
World Ranking
6282
National Ranking
2735

Francis M. Miezin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis M. Miezin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Francis M. Miezin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis M. Miezin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francis M. Miezin is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis, located in the United States. The scientist maintains a professional presence within this academic institution, contributing to its research community.

Details regarding recent papers, including titles, years of publication, and venues, are not available. Information on frequent co-authors and publication venues has not been provided.

No data on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work has been reported. Similarly, no records of awards or honors have been documented for this scientist.

This profile reflects the available data on Francis M. Miezin's academic affiliation and the absence of detailed publication and research topic records.

Best Publications

  • Functional network organization of the human brain

    Jonathan D. Power;Alexander L. Cohen;Steven M. Nelson;Gagan S. Wig

  • Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans

    Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Damien A. Fair;Francis M. Miezin;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: I. increases in subcortical structures and cerebellum but not in nonvisual cortex

    Gordon L. Shulman;Maurizio Corbetta;Randy L. Buckner;Julie A. Fiez

  • Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography

    M Corbetta;FM Miezin;S Dobmeyer;GL Shulman

  • A PET study of visuospatial attention

    Maurizio Corbetta;Francis M. Miezin;Gordon L. Shulman;Steven E. Petersen

  • A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Kristina M. Visscher;Erica D. Palmer;Francis M. Miezin

  • Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: Ii. decreases in cerebral cortex

    Gordon L. Shulman;Julie A. Fiez;Maurizio Corbetta;Randy L. Buckner

  • Functional brain networks develop from a "local to distributed" organization

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Jonathan D. Power;Nico U. F. Dosenbach

  • The maturing architecture of the brain's default network.

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church

  • Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration

    Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing

    F.M. Miezin;L. Maccotta;J.M. Ollinger;S.E. Petersen

  • Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans

    Maurizio Corbetta;Francis M. Miezin;Susan Dobmeyer;Gordon L. Shulman

  • Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons.

    Unknown

  • Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory.

    Larry R. Squire;Jeffrey G. Ojemann;Francis M. Miezin;Steven E. Petersen

  • Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding

    William M Kelley;Francis M Miezin;Kathleen B McDermott;Randy L Buckner

  • Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction

    Maurizio Corbetta;Gordon L. Shulman;Francis M. Miezin;Steven E. Petersen

  • Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT)

    Unknown

  • A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity

    Damien A. Fair;Bradley L. Schlaggar;L B A Alexander Cohen;Francis M. Miezin

  • Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI.

    Alexander L. Cohen;Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Francis M. Miezin

  • Mapping human visual cortex with positron emission tomography.

    Peter T. Fox;Mark A. Mintun;Marcus E. Raichle;Francis M. Miezin

  • Functional neuroanatomical differences between adults and school-age children in the processing of single words.

    Bradley L. Schlaggar;Timothy T. Brown;Heather M. Lugar;Kristina M. Visscher

  • Developmental Changes in Human Cerebral Functional Organization for Word Generation

    Timothy T. Brown;Heather M. Lugar;Rebecca S. Coalson;Fran M. Miezin

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen Washington University in St. Louis
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis
Randy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner Harvard University
Bradley L. Schlaggar
Bradley L. Schlaggar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Maurizio Corbetta
Maurizio Corbetta University of Padua
Nico U.F. Dosenbach
Nico U.F. Dosenbach Washington University in St. Louis
Gordon L. Shulman
Gordon L. Shulman Washington University in St. Louis
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota
Neal J. Cohen
Neal J. Cohen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Julie A. Fiez
Julie A. Fiez University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students interested in brain science also pursue fields like social work, behavioral analysis, or psychology for complementary knowledge and job options. Flexible online study options now let you upskill without putting your life on hold.

Students aiming to support communities may consider an online msw program. Social work offers valuable insights into mental health and social systems, and online MSW degrees make this path more accessible and affordable.

Those interested in behavioral interventions can pursue bcba programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts. This pathway is ideal for individuals who want to work on behavior modification and therapy for different populations.

If you’re looking to complete your degree faster, options like a fast track social work degree online or a fast track psychology degree can help you enter the workforce sooner. These programs are designed for motivated learners keen on quick progression and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Francis M. Miezin

Recently Published Articles