World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7505
World Ranking
8781
National Ranking
886

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
7439
World Ranking
8494
National Ranking
626

Emily S. Cross publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily S. Cross sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emily S. Cross D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily S. Cross sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily S. Cross is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on psychology and neuroscience, producing a body of work that intersects social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Cross's subfields of expertise are:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science

Their research themes incorporate a diverse range of topics, notably:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Cross include:

  • Kohinoor Monish Darda
  • Ryssa Moffat
  • Nathan Caruana
  • Guy Laban
  • Richard Ramsey

The scientist regularly publishes in a set of recurring venues which include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Cross are:

  • "What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You" (2021) published in Current Robotics Reports
  • "Social Robots on a Global Stage: Establishing a Role for Culture During Human-Robot Interaction" (2020) published in International Journal of Social Robotics
  • "Social Cognition in the Age of Human-Robot Interaction" (2020) published in Trends in Neurosciences
  • "Mind Meets Machine: Towards a Cognitive Science of Human-Machine Interactions" (2020) published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Timing is everything: Dance aesthetics depend on the complexity of movement kinematics" (2020) published in Cognition

Best Publications

  • Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

    Emily S. Cross;Antonia F. de C. Hamilton;Scott T. Grafton

  • Sensitivity of the Action Observation Network to Physical and Observational Learning

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;David J. M. Kraemer;David J. M. Kraemer;Antonia F. de C. Hamilton;William M. Kelley

  • Justify your alpha

    Daniel Lakens;Federico G. Adolfi;Federico G. Adolfi;Casper J. Albers;Farid Anvari

  • Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance

    Bettina Bläsing;Beatriz Calvo-Merino;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Corinne Jola

  • The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception.

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Louise Kirsch;Luca Francesco Ticini;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You

    Anna Henschel;Guy Laban;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation

    Emily S. Cross;Paul J. Schmitt;Scott T. Grafton

  • Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Roman Liepelt;Antonia F. de C. Hamilton;Jim Parkinson

  • Social robots on a global stage: establishing a role for culture during human-robot interaction

    Velvetina Lim;Maki Rooksby;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network.

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Antonia F. de C. Hamilton;David J. M. Kraemer;David J. M. Kraemer;William M. Kelley

  • The Perception of Emotion in Artificial Agents

    Ruud Hortensius;Felix Hekele;Emily S. Cross

  • Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.

    Nichola Rice Cohen;Emily S. Cross;Eugene Tunik;Scott T. Grafton;Scott T. Grafton

  • Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics.

    Louise P. Kirsch;Cosimo Urgesi;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • Social Cognition in the Age of Human-Robot Interaction.

    Anna Henschel;Ruud Hortensius;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • Neuroaesthetics and beyond: new horizons in applying the science of the brain to the art of dance

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Luca Francesco Ticini

  • From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction

    Emily S. Cross;Ruud Hortensius;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • Mind Meets Machine: Towards a Cognitive Science of Human-Machine Interactions.

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Richard Ramsey

  • Do alternative names block young and older adults retrieval of proper names

    Emily S Cross;Deborah M Burke

  • Dynamic modulation of the action observation network by movement familiarity

    Tom Gardner;Nia Goulden;Emily S. Cross

  • From automata to animate beings: the scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents.

    Ruud Hortensius;Ruud Hortensius;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • The control of automatic imitation based on bottom—up and top—down cues to animacy: Insights from brain and behavior

    André Klapper;Richard Ramsey;Daniël Wigboldus;Emily S. Cross

Frequent Co-Authors

Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Sukhvinder S. Obhi McMaster University
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton University College London
Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Simone Schütz-Bosbach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Roman Liepelt
Roman Liepelt University of Hagen
Agnieszka Wykowska
Agnieszka Wykowska Italian Institute of Technology
Harriet Over
Harriet Over University of York
George L. Wolford
George L. Wolford Dartmouth College
William M. Kelley
William M. Kelley Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is a diverse and dynamic field, often intersecting with some of the best majors in college for future earnings and job prospects. If you're interested in pursuing a related online degree, many programs now offer flexibility to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

Opting for accredited online colleges that accept fafsa can help make your education more affordable and accessible, allowing you to explore neuroscience and allied disciplines without significant financial burden.

For those not ready to commit to a full degree program, shorter-term options like certificates i can get online offer valuable skills that can be applied in healthcare, research, or data analysis. These certificates provide a quicker route into the job market or further specialization.

If you're seeking a streamlined path, consider exploring what is the easiest degree to get online. These programs often serve as a stepping stone into advanced neuroscience studies or related careers, making academic and career advancement more approachable.

Best Scientists Citing Emily S. Cross

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles