World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
43
Citations
20778
World Ranking
1906
National Ranking
1111

John O. Ledyard publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John O. Ledyard sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John O. Ledyard D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John O. Ledyard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

John O. Ledyard is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans several interconnected fields including Decision Sciences, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Social Sciences. They have contributed to specialized subfields such as Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, and Finance.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad spectrum with a focus on Auction Theory and Applications, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis, Economic Theories and Models, and Stochastic Processes and Financial Applications.

Recent publications by John O. Ledyard include the following papers:

  • "IEL-CDA model: A more accurate theory of behavior in continuous double auctions" (2024), published in the Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
  • "Issue Information" (2023), published in the Journal of Public Economic Theory
  • "A More Accurate Theory of Behavior in Continuous Double Auctions" (2023), published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Issue Information" (2024), published in the Journal of Public Economic Theory
  • "A Continuous Combinatorial Financial Exchange: Design, Simulations, and Live Testing" (2025), published in SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Jasmina Arifovic
  • Anil Donmez
  • Mikhail Anufriev
  • Valentyn Panchenko
  • Rabah Amir

John O. Ledyard's works have appeared regularly in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Public Economic Theory
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

Over the course of their career, John O. Ledyard has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1999.

Best Publications

  • Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

    John O. Ledyard

  • Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

    John O. Ledyard

  • Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the "Free Rider" Problem

    Theodore Groves;John Ledyard

  • The pure theory of large two-candidate elections

    John O. Ledyard

  • The Promise of Prediction Markets

    Kenneth J. Arrow;Robert Forsythe;Michael Gorham;Robert Hahn

  • Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: an experimental approach.

    Jeffrey S. Banks;John O. Ledyard;David P. Porter

  • A New and Improved Design for Multiobject Iterative Auctions

    Anthony M. Kwasnica;John O. Ledyard;Dave Porter;Christine DeMartini

  • The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services

    John O. Ledyard;Mark Olson;David Porter;Joseph A. Swanson

  • Nonvoting and the existence of equilibrium under majority rule

    Melvin J Hinich;John O Ledyard;Peter C Ordeshook

  • Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem

    Mark M. Bykowsky;Robert J. Cull;John O. Ledyard

  • Theories of price formation and exchange in double oral auctions

    David Easley;John O. Ledyard

  • Experiments Testing Multiobject Allocation Mechanisms

    John O. Ledyard;David Porter;Antonio Rangel

  • The paradox of voting and candidate competition: A general equilibrium analysis

    John O. Ledyard

  • Designing organizations for trading pollution rights

    John O Ledyard;Kristin Szakaly-Moore

  • A Theory of Electoral Equilibrium: A Spatial Analysis Based on the Theory of Games

    Melvin J. Hinich;John O. Ledyard;Peter C. Ordeshook

  • Some limitations of demand revelaing processes

    Theodore Groves;John O. Ledyard

  • A New and Improved Design For Multi-Object Iterative Auctions

    Christine DeMartini;Anthony M. Kwasnica;John O. Ledyard;David Porter

  • The scope of the hypothesis of Bayesian equilibrium

    John O Ledyard

  • Incentive compatibility and incomplete information

    John O Ledyard

  • An Experimental Test of Flexible Combinatorial Spectrum Auction Formats

    Christoph Brunner;Jacob K. Goeree;Charles A. Holt;John O. Ledyard

  • Individual Evolutionary Learning, Other-regarding Preferences, and the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism

    Jasmina Arifovic;John Ledyard

  • Individual evolutionary learning, other-regarding preferences, and the voluntary contributions mechanism

    Jasmina Arifovic;John Ledyard

Frequent Co-Authors

David Porter
David Porter Chapman University
Thomas R. Palfrey
Thomas R. Palfrey California Institute of Technology
Peter Bossaerts
Peter Bossaerts University of Cambridge
Charles R. Plott
Charles R. Plott California Institute of Technology
Vernon L. Smith
Vernon L. Smith Chapman University
Robert J. Shiller
Robert J. Shiller Yale University
Charles N. Noussair
Charles N. Noussair University of Arizona
Antonio Rangel
Antonio Rangel California Institute of Technology
Peter C. Ordeshook
Peter C. Ordeshook California Institute of Technology
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees designed to further your career. Today, many students are exploring the flexibility and advantages of earning a business-related degree remotely. For those seeking to enhance data-driven decision-making skills, a masters business intelligence program provides advanced training in analytics and reporting—valuable assets in banking, financial analysis, and corporate strategy.

If you prefer a broader business approach, pursuing an online mba without gmat requirements can be ideal. These programs let you build business expertise without standardized testing barriers. Additionally, cost is a crucial consideration; many students find value in an mba under 40k, balancing professional growth and affordability.

The rise of digital business strategies has also boosted demand for online marketers. A social media marketing degree allows you to specialize in areas crucial for today’s economy, like branding and engagement analytics. Whether your interests lie in big data, business leadership, or digital marketing, online degree options offer the flexibility to shape your unique career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing John O. Ledyard

Trending Scientists