World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5198
World Ranking
9859
National Ranking
972

Harriet Over publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harriet Over sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Harriet Over D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harriet Over sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harriet Over is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains within neuroscience, psychology, and social sciences, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology among other subfields.

They have contributed extensively to the study of moral and emotional judgment, evolutionary psychology, face recognition and perception, as well as social and intergroup psychology. Additional areas of interest include cultural differences and values, child and animal learning development, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Harriet Over's recent published papers include:

  • Seven Challenges for the Dehumanization Hypothesis, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The Social Function of Imitation in Development, 2020, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  • Falsifying the Dehumanization Hypothesis, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Richard Cook
  • Steven P. Tipper
  • Adam Eggleston
  • Florence E. Enock
  • Jonathan C. Flavell

Their work appears regularly in several academic journals, most notably:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Cognition
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

In terms of their disciplinary focus, Harriet Over has significantly contributed to projects and studies under the following main fields of study:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

The subfields of their scholarly pursuits cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Harriet Over's contributions to main research topics include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Best Publications

  • Putting the social into social learning: explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children's copying behavior

    Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show Increased Helping Following Priming with Affiliation

    Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children.

    Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators.

    Jan M. Engelmann;Harriet Over;Esther Herrmann;Michael Tomasello

  • The social side of imitation

    Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Adolescents and loot boxes: links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase

    David Isaac Zendle;Rachel Meyer;Harriet Over

  • The origins of belonging: social motivation in infants and young children.

    Harriet Over

  • Young Children Are More Likely to Spontaneously Attribute Mental States to Members of Their Own Group.

    Niamh Caitriona McLoughlin;Harriet Over

  • Eighteen-month-olds understand false beliefs in an unexpected-contents task.

    David Buttelmann;Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter;Michael Tomasello

  • The effects of collaboration and minimal-group membership on children's prosocial behavior, liking, affiliation, and trust.

    Maria Plötner;Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter;Michael Tomasello

  • I won't tell: Young children show loyalty to their group by keeping group secrets

    Antonia Misch;Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners

    Tim Vestner;Steven Paul Tipper;Tom Hartley;Harriet Over

  • The influence of group membership on young children's prosocial behaviour.

    Harriet Over

  • Like Me: A Homophily-Based Account of Human Culture

    Daniel Haun;Harriet Over

  • Children draw more affiliative pictures following priming with third-party ostracism

    Ruiting Song;Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Stick with your group: Young children's attitudes about group loyalty

    Antonia Misch;Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Seven Challenges for the Dehumanization Hypothesis.

    Harriet Over

  • Children infer affiliative and status relations from watching others imitate

    Harriet Over;Malinda Carpenter

  • Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from

    Harriet Over;Richard Cook

  • Culture moderates children's responses to ostracism situations.

    Harriet Over;Ayse K. Uskul

  • Responses to social exclusion in cultural context: Evidence from farming and herding communities

    Ayse K. Uskul;Harriet Over

Frequent Co-Authors

Malinda Carpenter
Malinda Carpenter University of St Andrews
Steven P. Tipper
Steven P. Tipper University of York
Richard J. Cook
Richard J. Cook University of Waterloo
Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University
Ayse K. Uskul
Ayse K. Uskul University of Sussex
Daniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun Max Planck Society
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Yarrow Dunham
Yarrow Dunham Yale University
Emily S. Cross
Emily S. Cross University of Glasgow
Michael J. Crowley
Michael J. Crowley Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there are several related online degree options to help you further your goals and expand your professional opportunities. Social work, for example, is closely linked to psychology and offers diverse pathways in community services, healthcare, and counseling. Today, many universities offer online social work programs that provide flexibility and affordability for working professionals.

For those looking for budget-friendly education, you can explore affordable online social work programs in Tennessee, which are well-respected for their balance of quality and cost. In the South, the cheapest social work degrees in Arkansas offer additional value, making education accessible to more students.

Urban centers like Atlanta also have a strong reputation for education affordability; discover the most affordable social work degree programs in Atlanta. Out West, students seeking flexibility might be interested in affordable social work degrees in Arizona, which can lead to rewarding and impactful careers.

Choosing the right online degree and cost-effective pathway can set you up for career success, whether your interest is in clinical psychology, counseling, or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Harriet Over

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles