World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
22560
World Ranking
2042
National Ranking
228

Steven P. Tipper publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven P. Tipper sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven P. Tipper D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven P. Tipper sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Steven P. Tipper is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields primarily within neuroscience and psychology, with extensive contributions to cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as social psychology. Their interdisciplinary work also covers computer vision and pattern recognition, alongside sociology and political science.

The scientist has focused on topics including face recognition and perception, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, cultural differences and values, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, neural and behavioral psychology studies, social and intergroup psychology, and child and animal learning development.

Some of Steven P. Tipper's recent publications include:

  • Exploring patterns of ongoing thought under naturalistic and conventional task-based conditions, 2021, Consciousness and Cognition
  • No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization, 2021, Cognition
  • Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution, 2021, Cognition
  • Culturally learned first impressions occur rapidly and automatically and emerge early in development, 2020, Developmental Science
  • An Investigation into the Utilisation of CNN with LSTM for Video Deepfake Detection, 2024, Applied Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steven P. Tipper include Harriet Over, Jonathan C. Flavell, Richard Cook, Florence E. Enock, and Adam Eggleston.

Their work is often published in venues such as Cognition, Scientific Reports, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Consciousness and Cognition, and Applied Sciences.

Steven P. Tipper has been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects:

    Steven P. Tipper

  • Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

    Alexandra Frischen;Andrew P. Bayliss;Steven P. Tipper

  • A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention.

    George Houghton;Steven Paul Tipper

  • Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.

    Steven P. Tipper

  • Selective attention and priming: inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.

    Steven P. Tipper;Margaret Cranston

  • Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention.

    Steven P. Tipper;Cathy Lortie;Gordon C. Baylis

  • Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.

    Steven P. Tipper;Jon Driver;Bruce Weaver

  • Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli.

    Steven P. Tipper;Jon Driver

  • Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

    Steven P. Tipper;Bruce Weaver;Loretta M. Jerreat;Arloene L. Burak

  • Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention.

    Andrew P. Bayliss;Giuseppe di Pellegrino;Steven P. Tipper

  • Mechanisms of attention: a developmental study

    Steven P. Tipper;Tracy A. Bourque;Susan H. Anderson;Jamie C. Brehaut

  • Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects

    Steven P. Tipper;Louise A. Howard;Stephen R. Jackson

  • Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.

    Steven P. Tipper;Jamie C. Brehaut;Jon Driver

  • Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression.

    Andrew P. Bayliss;Alexandra Frischen;Mark J. Fenske;Steven P. Tipper

  • Predictive Gaze Cues and Personality Judgments Should Eye Trust You

    Andrew P. Bayliss;Steven P. Tipper

  • Inhibitory Mechanisms of Neural and Cognitive Control: Applications to Selective Attention and Sequential Action

    George Houghton;Steven P. Tipper

  • Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at

    Andrew P. Bayliss;Matthew A. Paul;Peter R. Cannon;Steven P. Tipper

  • Less attentional selectivity as a result of declining inhibition in older adults

    Steven P. Tipper

  • Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects

    Steven P. Tipper;Matthew A. Paul;Amy E. Hayes

  • Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure

    Steven P. Tipper;Steven P. Tipper;Gordon C. Baylis;Gordon C. Baylis

  • Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition

    Louise A. Howard;S. P. Tipper

Frequent Co-Authors

Harriet Over
Harriet Over University of York
Paul E. Downing
Paul E. Downing Bangor University
Bruce Milliken
Bruce Milliken McMaster University
Klaus Kessler
Klaus Kessler Aston University
Gordon C. Baylis
Gordon C. Baylis Western Kentucky University
Richard J. Cook
Richard J. Cook University of Waterloo
Juan Lupiáñez
Juan Lupiáñez University of Granada
Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Giuseppe di Pellegrino University of Bologna
Jane E. Raymond
Jane E. Raymond University of Birmingham
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many students are interested in flexible online degrees that can accelerate their entry into the workforce. Online psychology programs provide foundational knowledge, preparing graduates for specialized roles such as counselors, therapists, or social workers.

Each state has unique licensing requirements for counselors, which can impact the route you take after earning your degree. For example, those seeking the fastest way to become a counselor in Maine can take advantage of specific online program options. Similarly, students interested in the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Maryland should look for state-accredited online degrees for quicker licensure.

Massachusetts accelerated counseling programs are ideal for those wanting an intensive curriculum with faster completion times. In Michigan, students can research the fastest way to become a counselor in Michigan to understand the best online learning options. No matter your state, researching accredited online degrees and state-specific pathways is essential to launching your psychology career efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Steven P. Tipper

Trending Scientists