World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 76 1887 1726 75 73 1006 23952

Henk van Loveren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henk van Loveren between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henk van Loveren published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 22.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 143 publications in 2023. 136 of the 1,029 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 143. Peak 143 publications in 2023. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 39 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 78 publications 2020: 71 publications 2021: 78 publications 2022: 110 publications 2023: 143 publications 2024: 83 publications 2025: 53 publications
1981 2025

1,029 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henk van Loveren: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 8
1990 5
1991 3
1992 9
1993 5
1994 8
1995 15
1996 14
1997 13
1998 7
1999 9
2000 7
2001 10
2002 15
2003 15
2004 7
2005 13
2006 8
2007 11
2008 16
2009 11
2010 8
2011 18
2012 16
2013 21
2014 16
2015 13
2016 16
2017 39
2018 48
2019 78
2020 71
2021 78
2022 110
2023 143
2024 83
2025 53
Total 1,029
Download as CSV

Henk van Loveren publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk van Loveren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 807+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 1,006 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100 1,006
Download as CSV

Henk van Loveren D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk van Loveren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163 76
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Henk van Loveren is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research largely spans the fields of Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Food Science, Dermatology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Immunology and Allergy.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Contact dermatitis and allergies
  • Air quality and health impacts
  • Food allergy and anaphylaxis research
  • Environmental policies and emissions
  • Recycling and waste management techniques

Van Loveren has contributed significantly to research published predominantly in the EFSA Journal, where they have authored or coauthored numerous papers. Other venues include PubMed, Nanomaterials, DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council), and EFSA Supporting Publications.

Some notable recent papers authored or coauthored by van Loveren include:

  • Update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water, 2020, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of frozen and dried formulations from whole yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of pasteurised Akkermansia muciniphila as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Process-specific technical data used in exposure assessment of food enzymes, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of frozen and freeze-dried formulations of the lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus larva) as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2022, EFSA Journal

Van Loveren frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Alicja Mortensen, Laurence Vernis, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, and Holger Zorn. These collaborations have resulted in numerous joint publications that contribute to the body of knowledge in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles.

    Margriet V.D.Z. Park;Margriet V.D.Z. Park;Arianne M. Neigh;Jolanda P. Vermeulen;Liset J.J. de la Fonteyne

  • Contaminant-induced immunotoxicity in harbour seals: wildlife at risk?

    Peter Ross;Rik De Swart;Richard Addison;Henk Van Loveren

  • Pre-natal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances may be associated with altered vaccine antibody levels and immune-related health outcomes in early childhood

    Berit Granum;Line S Haug;Ellen Namork;Solvor B Stølevik

  • Systemic and immunotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in an intravenous 28 days repeated dose toxicity study in rats.

    Wim H. De Jong;Leo T.M. Van Der Ven;Annemarie Sleijffers;Margriet V.D.Z. Park

  • Immunoglobulin-free light chains elicit immediate hypersensitivity-like responses.

    Frank A Redegeld;Maurice W van der Heijden;Mirjam Kool;Bianca M Heijdra

  • Particle size dependent deposition and pulmonary inflammation after short-term inhalation of silver nanoparticles

    Hedwig M. Braakhuis;Ilse Gosens;Petra Krystek;John A. F. Boere

  • Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants

    Hanspeter Naegeli;Andrew Nicholas Birch;Josep Casacuberta

  • Monitoring immune modulation by nutrition in the general population: identifying and substantiating effects on human health.

    Ruud Albers;Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard;Deborah Braun;Philip C. Calder

  • Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation

    David A. Basketter;Klaus E. Andersen;Carola Liden;Henk Van Loveren

  • Bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness after ovalbumin inhalation in sensitized mice

    E. M. Hessel;A. J. M. Van Oosterhout;C. L. Hofstra;J. J. De Bie

  • The status of in vitro toxicity studies in the risk assessment of nanomaterials

    Margriet Vdz Park;Margriet Vdz Park;Daniëlle Pk Lankveld;Henk van Loveren;Henk van Loveren;Wim H de Jong

  • Probiotics: Immunomodulation and Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy

    Janine Ezendam;Henk van Loveren

  • Evaluation of immunomodulation by Lactobacillus casei Shirota: Immune function, autoimmunity and gene expression

    Kirsten A. Baken;Janine Ezendam;Eric R. Gremmer;Arja de Klerk

  • Assessment of preferential T-helper 1 or T-helper 2 induction by low molecular weight compounds using the local lymph node assay in conjunction with RT-PCR and ELISA for interferon-gamma and interleukin-4

    Rob J. Vandebriel;Wim H. De Jong;Sander W. Spiekstra;Mariska Van Dijk

  • T-cell-mediated induction of airway hyperreactivity in mice.

    Johan Garssen;Frans P. Nijkamp;Helen Van Der Vliet;Henk Van Loveren

  • Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins from the maternal diet may be associated with immunosuppressive effects that persist into early childhood

    Solvor Berntsen Stølevik;Unni Cecilie Nygaard;Ellen Namork;Margaretha Haugen

  • Traffic-related air pollution affects peak expiratory flow, exhaled nitric oxide, and inflammatory nasal markers.

    Peter A. Steerenberg;Stefan Nierkens;Paul H. Fischer;Henk Van Loveren

  • Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins is associated with increased risk of wheeze and infections in infants.

    Solvor Berntsen Stølevik;Unni Cecilie Nygaard;Ellen Namork;Margaretha Haugen

  • Identification of the appropriate dose metric for pulmonary inflammation of silver nanoparticles in an inhalation toxicity study

    Hedwig M Braakhuis;Flemming R Cassee;Paul H B Fokkens;Liset J J de la Fonteyne

  • Cord blood gene expression supports that prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances causes depressed immune functionality in early childhood

    Jeroen L. A. Pennings;Danyel G. J. Jennen;Unni C. Nygaard;Ellen Namork

  • Different mechanisms of release of vasoactive amines by mast cells occur in T cell-dependent compared to IgE-dependent cutaneous hypersensitivity responses.

    Henk van Loveren;Sandra Kraeuter-Kops;Philip W. Askenase

  • Skin sensitization in chemical risk assessment: report of a WHO/IPCS international workshop focusing on dose-response assessment.

    Henk van Loveren;Amanda Cockshott;Tom Gebel;Ursula Gundert-Remy

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudia Bolognesi
Claudia Bolognesi National Cancer Research Institute, UK
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Karl-Heinz Engel
Karl-Heinz Engel Technical University of Munich
Dominique Turck
Dominique Turck University of Lille
Lieve Herman
Lieve Herman Flemish Community
Yolanda Sanz
Yolanda Sanz Spanish National Research Council
Rosangela Marchelli
Rosangela Marchelli University of Parma
Johan Garssen
Johan Garssen Utrecht University
Susan J. Fairweather-Tait
Susan J. Fairweather-Tait University of East Anglia
Laurence Castle
Laurence Castle Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Immunology in the USA, exploring related healthcare degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students begin by pursuing foundational nursing credentials, with several programs standing out as ideal entry points. For example, the best easiest LPN programs to get into offer accessible pathways into nursing, providing essential clinical skills that complement immunological knowledge.

Advancing further, aspiring practitioners might consider becoming Nurse Practitioners, where the easiest nurse practitioner degree programs can make the transition smoother without compromising quality training. Specializations like psychiatric nursing are also in high demand, with some online programs noted for excellence. For mental health-focused careers, the best PMHNP programs online ensure strong clinical placements, essential for hands-on experience.

Budget-conscious students can also find quality education through the cheap psych NP programs. These programs offer an affordable route into psychiatric nursing, combining cost-effectiveness with comprehensive curriculum to support career growth in both clinical and research immunology contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Henk van Loveren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles