World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rosangela Marchelli

Rosangela Marchelli

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
14439
World Ranking
6795
National Ranking
162

Rosangela Marchelli publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosangela Marchelli sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 440 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Rosangela Marchelli D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosangela Marchelli sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rosangela Marchelli is affiliated with the University of Parma in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences as well as medicine. Their work is prominently published in the EFSA Journal.

The scientist's research domains encompass:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Medicine

Within these domains, their subfields of study include:

  • Food Science
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Genetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Key topics covered in their publications are:

  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Digestive system and related health
  • Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Insect and Pesticide Research

Their recent papers include:

  • Safety of dried yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of frozen and dried formulations from whole house crickets (Acheta domesticus) as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Guidance on the preparation and submission of an application for authorisation of a novel food in the context of Regulation (EU) 2015/22831 (Revision 1)2, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of frozen and dried formulations from whole yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal
  • Safety of frozen and dried formulations from migratory locust (Locusta migratoria) as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, 2021, EFSA Journal

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Dominique Turck
  • Androniki Naska
  • Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst
  • Alexandre Maciuk
  • Frank Thiès

Marchelli's publication record is concentrated in the EFSA Journal, indicating a focused contribution to the field of food safety, regulations, and novel food authorization processes within the European Union framework.

Best Publications

  • Bioavailability of trans-resveratrol from red wine in humans

    Paola Vitaglione;Stefano Sforza;Gianni Galaverna;Cristiana Ghidini

  • Clarification and concentration of citrus and carrot juices by integrated membrane processes

    A Cassano;E Drioli;G Galaverna;R Marchelli

  • Recent advances in mycotoxin determination in food and feed by hyphenated chromatographic techniques/mass spectrometry.

    Stefano Sforza;Chiara Dall'Asta;Rosangela Marchelli

  • Guidance on the preparation and presentation of an application for authorisation of a novel food in the context of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283

    Dominique Turck;Jean‐Louis Bresson;Barbara Burlingame;Tara Dean

  • Fluorescent Chemosensor for Organic Guests and Copper(II) Ion Based on Dansyldiethylenetriamine-Modified β-Cyclodextrin

    Roberto Corradini;Arnaldo Dossena;Gianni Galaverna;Rosangela Marchelli

  • Occurrence of deoxynivalenol and its 3-β-D-glucoside in wheat and maize

    Franz Berthiller;Chiara Dall'Asta;Roberto Corradini;Rosangela Marchelli

  • Safety of dried yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

    Novel Foods Efsa Panel on Nutrition;Dominique Turck;Jacqueline Castenmiller

  • Insights into peptide nucleic acid (PNA) structural features: The crystal structure of a d-lysine-based chiral PNA–DNA duplex

    Valeria Menchise;Giuseppina De Simone;Tullia Tedeschi;Roberto Corradini

  • Development of a seven-target multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of transgenic soybean and maize in feeds and foods.

    Andrea Germini;Alessandro Zanetti;Claudia Salati;Stefano Rossi

  • Simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli O175:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes by multiplex PCR

    Andrea Germini;Annalisa Masola;Paola Carnevali;Rosangela Marchelli

  • A new integrated membrane process for the production of concentrated blood orange juice : Effect on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity

    Gianni Galaverna;Gianluca Di Silvestro;Alfredo Cassano;Stefano Sforza

  • Chirality as a tool in nucleic acid recognition: principles and relevance in biotechnology and in medicinal chemistry.

    Roberto Corradini;Stefano Sforza;Tullia Tedeschi;Rosangela Marchelli

  • A MODIFIED CYCLODEXTRIN WITH A FULLY ENCAPSULATED DANSYL GROUP : SELF-INCLUSION IN THE SOLID STATE AND IN SOLUTION

    R. Corradini;A. Dossena;R. Marchelli;A. Panagia

  • Enantioselective Fluorescence Sensing of Amino Acids by Modified Cyclodextrins: Role of the Cavity and Sensing Mechanism

    Sara Pagliari;Roberto Corradini;Gianni Galaverna;Stefano Sforza

  • Difficulties in fumonisin determination: the issue of hidden fumonisins.

    Chiara Dall’Asta;Mattia Mangia;Franz Berthiller;Alexandra Molinelli

  • Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Raw Ham Muscle, Salami and Dry-Cured Ham from Pigs Fed with Contaminated Diet

    Chiara Dall'Asta;Giacomo Galaverna;Terenzio Bertuzzi;Alessandra Moseriti

  • New reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method to detect aflatoxins in food and feed with cyclodextrins as fluorescence enhancers added to the eluent.

    E Chiavaro;C Dall’Asta;G Galaverna;A Biancardi

  • Targeting microRNAs involved in human diseases: A novel approach for modification of gene expression and drug development

    Roberto Gambari;Enrica Fabbri;Monica Borgatti;Ilaria Lampronti

  • A multiplex RT-PCR approach to detect aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus.

    F. Degola;E. Berni;C. Dall'Asta;E. Spotti

  • Oligopeptides and free amino acids in Parma hams of known cathepsin B activity

    Stefano Sforza;Alessandro Pigazzani;Maurizio Motti;Cecilia Porta

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Sforza
Stefano Sforza University of Parma
Arnaldo Dossena
Arnaldo Dossena University of Parma
Dominique Turck
Dominique Turck University of Lille
Gianni Galaverna
Gianni Galaverna University of Parma
Yolanda Sanz
Yolanda Sanz Spanish National Research Council
Henk van Loveren
Henk van Loveren Maastricht University
Karl-Heinz Engel
Karl-Heinz Engel Technical University of Munich
Seppo Salminen
Seppo Salminen University of Turku
Andreu Palou
Andreu Palou University of the Balearic Islands
Pagona Lagiou
Pagona Lagiou National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and career opportunities related to Biology and Biochemistry can open doors in healthcare, management, and allied health fields. Many students with a background in these sciences choose to further their education with advanced degrees such as the cheapest online MBA in healthcare management. This pathway combines scientific expertise with practical business skills, helping graduates qualify for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and research facilities.

Other popular options include stepping into the fast-growing field of medical coding and billing. Understanding the ccs vs cpc salary differences is crucial, as these certifications can impact your earning potential and career trajectory. For comprehensive guidance on required training and salary expectations, see medical coder salary to evaluate the potential return on investment for these certifications.

If you’re considering the medical billing and coding profession, assessing the job market and work environment is essential. To weigh the advantages and challenges, check out this overview of the medical billing and coding job outlook. By exploring these related degrees and career paths, you can align your skills in biology or biochemistry with dynamic and rewarding roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Rosangela Marchelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles