What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Ecology
- Internal medicine
- Virus
Her primary areas of study are Phocoena, Porpoise, Ecology, Zoology and Fishery.
Her studies in Phocoena integrate themes in fields like Isolation by distance, Genetic structure, Aquatic animal, Biological dispersal and Seascape.
Ursula Siebert has included themes like Aerial survey, Habitat, Bioacoustics and Oceanography, Transect in her Porpoise study.
Her work on Blubber, Phoca and Range as part of her general Ecology study is frequently connected to Toxaphene, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
Her Zoology research includes themes of Pneumonia, Heavy metals and North sea.
Her work on Cetacea and Abundance is typically connected to Agency as part of general Fishery study, connecting several disciplines of science.
Her most cited work include:
- Emerging infectious diseases in cetaceans worldwide and the possible role of environmental stressors. (205 citations)
- Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management (203 citations)
- The 1988 and 2002 phocine distemper virus epidemics in European harbour seals. (196 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her main research concerns Phocoena, Fishery, Porpoise, Zoology and Phoca.
Her Phocoena study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ecology, Physiology, Anatomy and Pathology.
Her Fishery research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Foraging, Aerial survey, Habitat and German.
Ursula Siebert interconnects Bycatch, Oceanography and Offshore wind power in the investigation of issues within Porpoise.
Her work on Cetacea as part of general Zoology research is often related to Methylmercury, thus linking different fields of science.
In the subject of general Phoca, her work in Harbor seal is often linked to Phocine distemper virus, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
She most often published in these fields:
- Phocoena (31.02%)
- Fishery (25.13%)
- Porpoise (24.33%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Zoology (25.13%)
- Phocoena (31.02%)
- Porpoise (24.33%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ursula Siebert mainly investigates Zoology, Phocoena, Porpoise, Fishery and Phoca.
Her research in Zoology intersects with topics in German, Baltic sea, Predation and North sea.
Her Baltic sea research integrates issues from Bycatch and Perfluorooctanoic acid, Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid.
Ursula Siebert has researched Phocoena in several fields, including Physiology and Lymphocyte.
In her research, Abundance is intimately related to Habitat, which falls under the overarching field of Fishery.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Bone formation, Outbreak and Marine mammal in addition to Phoca.
Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Health effects from contaminant exposure in Baltic Sea birds and marine mammals: A review (9 citations)
- A review of pathogens in selected Baltic Sea indicator species. (8 citations)
- Aerial surveys for Antarctic minke whales (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) reveal sea ice dependent distribution patterns. (8 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Internal medicine
- Virus
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Zoology, Porpoise, Phocoena, Phoca and Habitat.
Her work carried out in the field of Zoology brings together such families of science as Whale, Outbreak and Predation.
Her Porpoise study incorporates themes from Audiology, Fishery, Marine mammal and Wildlife.
Her Phocoena research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Pneumonia, Sexual maturity, Health assessment, Bycatch and Baltic sea.
The concepts of her Phoca study are interwoven with issues in Bone formation, Skull bone, Skull and Pusa hispida.
Habitat is a subfield of Ecology that Ursula Siebert investigates.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
