World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
26069
World Ranking
18667
National Ranking
9302

John H. Suh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Suh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 730 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John H. Suh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Suh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John H. Suh is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record in medicine, with a primary focus on areas related to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, and surgery.

Their research primarily covers the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas, brain metastases and their management, meningioma and schwannoma management, advanced radiotherapy techniques, lung cancer research, the management of metastatic bone disease, and lung cancer treatments and mutations.

John H. Suh has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Current approaches to the management of brain metastases, 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline, 2022, Practical Radiation Oncology
  • Neuro-oncology management during the COVID-19 pandemic with a focus on WHO grades III and IV gliomas, 2020, Neuro-Oncology
  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Metastatic Surgical Cavities: A Critical Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • A Systematic Review Informing the Management of Symptomatic Brain Radiation Necrosis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Recommendations, 2023, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Samuel T. Chao
  • Erin S. Murphy
  • Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
  • Gene H. Barnett
  • Lilyana Angelov

John H. Suh often publishes in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Applied Radiation Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Neurosurgery

Their work spans a broad range of topics and subfields in medicine, with a focus on neuro-oncology and radiotherapy, contributing to the literature on brain cancer and treatment protocols.

Best Publications

  • Summary Report on the Graded Prognostic Assessment: An Accurate and Facile Diagnosis-Specific Tool to Estimate Survival for Patients With Brain Metastases

    Paul W. Sperduto;Norbert Kased;David Roberge;Zhiyuan Xu

  • Diagnosis-Specific Prognostic Factors, Indexes, and Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 4,259 Patients

    Paul W. Sperduto;Samuel T. Chao;Penny K. Sneed;Xianghua Luo

  • Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma

    Jan C. Buckner;Edward G. Shaw;Stephanie L. Pugh;Arnab Chakravarti

  • Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases.

    William F. Harstell;Charles B. Scott;Deborah Watkins Bruner;Charles W. Scarantino

  • Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Paul D. Brown;Stephanie Pugh;Nadia N. Laack;Jeffrey S. Wefel

  • Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group

    Nancy U Lin;Eudocia Q Lee;Hidefumi Aoyama;Igor J Barani

  • A multi-institutional review of radiosurgery alone vs. radiosurgery with whole brain radiotherapy as the initial management of brain metastases.

    Penny K Sneed;John H Suh;Steven J Goetsch;Seema N Sanghavi

  • Survival and Neurologic Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Motexafin Gadolinium and Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Brain Metastases

    Minesh P. Mehta;Patrick Rodrigus;C. H J Terhaard;Aroor Rao

  • The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

    Samuel T. Chao;John H. Suh;Shanker Raja;Shih Yuan Lee

  • Current approaches to the management of brain metastases.

    John H Suh;Rupesh Kotecha;Samuel T Chao;Manmeet S Ahluwalia

  • Effect of Tumor Subtype on Survival and the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

    Paul W. Sperduto;Norbert Kased;David Roberge;Zhiyuan Xu

  • Vertebral Compression Fracture After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis With a Focus on Radiation Dose and the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score

    Arjun Sahgal;Eshetu G. Atenafu;Samuel T. Chao;Ameen Al-Omair

  • A Phase 3 Trial of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone Versus WBRT and SRS With Temozolomide or Erlotinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0320.

    Paul W. Sperduto;Meihua Wang;H. Ian Robins;Michael C. Schell

  • Radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis, stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis method

    Seema N Sanghavi;Saranarendra S Miranpuri;Richard Chappell;John M Buatti

  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Brain Metastases

    John H. Suh

  • Local control and overall survival in atypical meningioma: a retrospective study.

    Lav K Goyal;John H Suh;Dasarahally S Mohan;Richard A Prayson

  • Challenges With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis

    Samuel T. Chao;Manmeet S. Ahluwalia;Gene H. Barnett;Glen H.J. Stevens

  • Application of recursive partitioning analysis and evaluation of the use of whole brain radiation among patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed brain metastases.

    Mark A. Chidel;John H. Suh;Chandana A. Reddy;Samuel T. Chao

  • Local control of brain metastases by stereotactic radiosurgery in relation to dose to the tumor margin

    Michael A. Vogelbaum;Lilyana Angelov;Shih Yuan Lee;Liang Li

  • Phase II trial of erlotinib with temozolomide and radiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

    David M. Peereboom;Dale R. Shepard;Manmeet S. Ahluwalia;Cathy J. Brewer

Frequent Co-Authors

Gene H. Barnett
Gene H. Barnett Cleveland Clinic
Michael A. Vogelbaum
Michael A. Vogelbaum Cleveland Clinic
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore
Paul D. Brown
Paul D. Brown Mayo Clinic
Arjun Sahgal
Arjun Sahgal Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Laurie E. Gaspar
Laurie E. Gaspar University of Colorado Denver
Robert Timmerman
Robert Timmerman The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Penny K. Sneed
Penny K. Sneed University of California, San Francisco
Patrick A. Kupelian
Patrick A. Kupelian University of California, Los Angeles
Walter J. Curran
Walter J. Curran Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers but not committed to the length of traditional medical school, online degree options in nursing and mental health are excellent alternatives. Many programs suit different education levels and career aspirations, providing fast and flexible entry into the workforce.

Advanced practice nurses can consider the fastest dnp online program options, which allow experienced nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice at an accelerated pace. Alternatively, there are dnp online programs that balance rigorous academics with a more accessible approach to admission and coursework.

For those starting their journey, the lpn accelerated program route provides a quick avenue into practical nursing positions without a lengthy time commitment. Mental health care is also growing, and those focused on this area can explore online pmhnp programs, which prepare students for specialized roles in psychiatric and mental health nursing.

Best Scientists Citing John H. Suh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles