World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
44821
World Ranking
11546
National Ranking
5921

Gene H. Barnett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene H. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 600 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gene H. Barnett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene H. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gene H. Barnett is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has produced a significant volume of research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans various subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Neurology, Epidemiology, and Oncology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to medical research.

The main topics addressed in their research include Brain Metastases and Treatment, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, Meningioma and Schwannoma Management, Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment, Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases, Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques, and Lung Cancer Research Studies.

Frequent publication venues for this scientist include:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Neurosurgery
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances

Some of the recent papers authored or contributed to by Gene H. Barnett are:

  • The Meningioma Enhancer Landscape Delineates Novel Subgroups and Drives Druggable Dependencies (2020), Cancer Discovery
  • Lessons Learned in Using Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Brain Tumors: A Case Series of 238 Patients from a Single Institution (2020), World Neurosurgery
  • Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis (2023), Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Preclinical Modeling of Surgery and Steroid Therapy for Glioblastoma Reveals Changes in Immunophenotype that are Associated with Tumor Growth and Outcome (2021), Clinical Cancer Research
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma: a multi-institutional study (2022), Journal of neurosurgery

Gene H. Barnett has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Alireza M. Mohammadi
  • Lilyana Angelov
  • John H. Suh
  • Erin S. Murphy
  • Samuel T. Chao

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.

    Daniel J. Brat;Roel G.W. Verhaak;Kenneth D. Aldape;W. K.Alfred Yung

  • Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas

    Francisco Sanchez-Vega;Marco Mina;Joshua Armenia;Walid K. Chatila

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

    Matthew H Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Molecular Profiling Reveals Biologically Discrete Subsets and Pathways of Progression in Diffuse Glioma.

    Michele Ceccarelli;Floris P Barthel;Tathiane M Malta;Thais S Sabedot

  • Maintenance therapy with tumor-Treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial

    Roger Stupp;Roger Stupp;Sophie Taillibert;Andrew A. Kanner;Santosh Kesari

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Pathogenic Germline Variants in 10,389 Adult Cancers

    Kuan-Lin Huang;R Jay Mashl;Yige Wu;Deborah I Ritter

  • Phase III randomized trial of CED of IL13-PE38QQR vs Gliadel wafers for recurrent glioblastoma.

    Sandeep Kunwar;Susan Chang;Manfred Westphal;Michael Vogelbaum

  • The candidate tumour suppressor protein ING4 regulates brain tumour growth and angiogenesis

    Igor Garkavtsev;Sergey V. Kozin;Olga Chernova;Lei Xu

  • Inhibition of constitutively active Stat3 suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in glioblastoma multiforme cells.

    Shaik Ohidar Rahaman;Phyllis C Harbor;Olga Chernova;Gene H Barnett

  • The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

    Samuel T. Chao;John H. Suh;Shanker Raja;Shih Yuan Lee

  • Residual tumor volume versus extent of resection: predictors of survival after surgery for glioblastoma

    Matthew M. Grabowski;Pablo F. Recinos;Amy S. Nowacki;Jason L. Schroeder

  • Serum S100β: A Noninvasive Marker of Blood-Brain Barrier Function and Brain Lesions

    Andrew A. Kanner;Andrew A. Kanner;Nicola Marchi;Vincent Fazio;Marc R. Mayberg;Marc R. Mayberg

  • Serum S-100β as a possible marker of blood–brain barrier disruption

    M Kapural;Lj Krizanac-Bengez;G Barnett;J Perl

  • Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy. Commentaries

    D. L. G. Hill;C. R. Maurer;R. J. Maciunas;J. A. Barwise

  • Tool guide for a surgical tool

    Iain H. Kalfas;Donald W. Kormos;David W. Piraino;Gene H. Barnett

  • The Brain Tumor Cooperative Group NIH Trial 87-01: a randomized comparison of surgery, external radiotherapy, and carmustine versus surgery, interstitial radiotherapy boost, external radiation therapy, and carmustine.

    Robert G. Selker;William R. Shapiro;Peter Burger;Margaret S. Blackwood

  • Use of a Frameless, Armless Stereotactic Wand for Brain Tumor Localization with Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Neuroimaging

    Gene H. Barnett;Donald W. Kormos;Charles P. Steiner;Joe R.T. Weisenberger

  • Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine

    Iain H. Kalfas;Donald W. Kormos;Michael A. Murphy;Rick L. McKenzie

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Suh
John H. Suh Cleveland Clinic
Michael A. Vogelbaum
Michael A. Vogelbaum Cleveland Clinic
L. Dade Lunsford
L. Dade Lunsford University of Pittsburgh
Jason P. Sheehan
Jason P. Sheehan University of Virginia
Douglas Kondziolka
Douglas Kondziolka New York University
Robert M. Starke
Robert M. Starke University of Miami
John K. Cowell
John K. Cowell Augusta University
Patrick A. Kupelian
Patrick A. Kupelian University of California, Los Angeles
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan Case Western Reserve University
Suyu Shu
Suyu Shu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medical careers beyond becoming a physician? Online degrees offer flexible routes into various fields. Many registered nurses consider advancing their qualifications through rn to np programs, which bridge the gap between nursing diplomas and advanced practice credentials, expanding your scope of care.

Those passionate about wellness and dietetics can pursue an online bs in nutrition, preparing for roles in public health, food service, and clinical settings.

For aspiring healthcare administrators, earning your degree through cahme accredited online mha programs is ideal. These programs provide the managerial skills needed to lead hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Nurses looking for advancement without in-person requirements will appreciate the option of an rn to bsn online with no clinicals degree. This allows for upskilling while balancing work and personal responsibilities.

These online pathways offer accessible routes to diverse and rewarding careers in the health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gene H. Barnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles