World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2818 2577 204 194 177 8220

Juliet Richters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juliet Richters between 1986 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juliet Richters published across 37 years, from 1986 to 2022, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2003. 6 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2003. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication
1986 2022

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juliet Richters: publications per year, 1986 to 2022
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 26
2004 1
2005 7
2006 9
2007 5
2008 7
2009 4
2010 11
2011 10
2012 10
2013 9
2014 13
2015 7
2016 8
2017 11
2018 2
2019 3
2020 3
2021 5
2022 1
Total 177
Download as CSV

Juliet Richters publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet Richters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 177
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Juliet Richters D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet Richters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Juliet Richters is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, focusing on subfields including Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly work centers on topics related to adolescent sexual and reproductive health, sexual function and dysfunction studies, sexuality, behavior, and technology, marriage and sexual relationships, HIV, drug use and sexual risk, sex work and related issues, as well as reproductive health and technologies.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Sexual Difficulties, Problems, and Help-Seeking in a National Representative Sample: The Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships (2022, Archives of Sexual Behavior)
  • Reproductive experiences and outcomes among a representative sample of women: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships (2021, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health)

In addition, Richters contributed to research indirectly through frequent collaboration with other scholars on topics such as unwanted sex and dual protection gaps, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to sexual health and public well-being.

Frequent collaborators in Richters' academic work include Anna Yeung, Chris Rissel, Kevin McGeechan, Richard de Visser, and Deborah Bateson, with multiple joint publications among these colleagues.

Their research findings have been published in various venues known for contributions to sexual health and public health disciplines, such as Archives of Sexual Behavior, The Journal of Sex Research, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, and Sexual Health.

Best Publications

  • Demographic and Psychosocial Features of Participants in Bondage and Discipline, “Sadomasochism” or Dominance and Submission (BDSM): Data from a National Survey

    Juliet Richters;Richard O. De Visser;Chris E. Rissel;Andrew E. Grulich

  • Sex in Australia: sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults.

    Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich

  • ‘I'm Telling You … The Language Barrier is the Most, the Biggest Challenge’: Barriers to Education among Karen Refugee Women in Australia

    Paula G. Watkins;Husna Razee;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: Sexual difficulties in a representative sample of adults

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • A Profile of Pornography Users in Australia: Findings From the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

    Chris Rissel;Juliet Richters;Richard O. de Visser;Alan McKee

  • Sex in Australia: the rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

    Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich

  • Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey.

    Juliet Richters;Richard de Visser;Chris Rissel;Anthony Smith

  • Prevalence and correlates of three types of pelvic pain in a nationally representative sample of Australian women.

    Marian K Pitts;Jason A Ferris;Anthony M A Smith;Julia M Shelley

  • Sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual men and women: the importance of desired frequency of sex

    Anthony Smith;Anthony Lyons;Jason Ferris;Juliet Richters

  • Who gets tattoos? Demographic and behavioral correlates of ever being tattooed in a representative sample of men and women.

    Wendy Heywood;Kent Patrick;Anthonry M. A. Smith;Judy M. Simpson

  • Sex in Australia: heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among a representative sample of adults.

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: autoerotic, esoteric and other sexual practices engaged in by a representative sample of adults.

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships

    Juliet Richters;Dennis Altman;Paul B. Badcock;Paul B. Badcock;Anthony M. A. Smith

  • Sex in Australia: Sexually transmissible infection and blood‐borne virus history in a representative sample of adults

    Andrew E Grulich;Richard O de Visser;Anthony M A Smith;Chris E Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: first experiences of vaginal intercourse and oral sex among a representative sample of adults

    Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser

  • Associations Between Religiosity and Sexuality in a Representative Sample of Australian Adults

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M. A. Smith;Juliet Richters;Chris E. Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: homosexual experience and recent homosexual encounters.

    Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: experiences of sexual coercion among a representative sample of adults.

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: contraceptive practices among a representative sample of women

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • Smoking and erectile dysfunction: findings from a representative sample of Australian men

    C Millett;L M Wen;C Rissel;A Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Rissel
Chris Rissel Flinders University
Andrew E. Grulich
Andrew E. Grulich University of New South Wales
Richard O. de Visser
Richard O. de Visser University of Sussex
Anthony M. A. Smith
Anthony M. A. Smith La Trobe University
Judy M. Simpson
Judy M. Simpson University of Sydney
Marian Pitts
Marian Pitts La Trobe University
Tony Butler
Tony Butler University of New South Wales
Jason Ferris
Jason Ferris University of Queensland
Garrett Prestage
Garrett Prestage University of New South Wales
Susan Kippax
Susan Kippax University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning is transforming access to Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA. More students are choosing flexible paths that fit their schedules and budgets. For those interested in advanced study, there are masters in social work accelerated programs that let you complete an MSW degree in less time, helping you fast-track your career in social work.

If you're drawn to understanding human behavior, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online provides the academic foundation needed for roles in mental health, education, and business. Affordability is also crucial – those seeking counseling credentials can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) to prepare for licensure while minimizing costs.

For students considering family therapy, online marriage and family therapy masters programs deliver specialized training to support families and couples in a range of settings. These flexible programs open doors to diverse career pathways in social services, education, and private practice—all through accessible online study.

Best Scientists Citing Juliet Richters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles