World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
8220
World Ranking
2818
National Ranking
204

Juliet Richters publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet Richters sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Juliet Richters D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet Richters sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juliet Richters is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, focusing on subfields including Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly work centers on topics related to adolescent sexual and reproductive health, sexual function and dysfunction studies, sexuality, behavior, and technology, marriage and sexual relationships, HIV, drug use and sexual risk, sex work and related issues, as well as reproductive health and technologies.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Sexual Difficulties, Problems, and Help-Seeking in a National Representative Sample: The Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships (2022, Archives of Sexual Behavior)
  • Reproductive experiences and outcomes among a representative sample of women: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships (2021, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health)

In addition, Richters contributed to research indirectly through frequent collaboration with other scholars on topics such as unwanted sex and dual protection gaps, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to sexual health and public well-being.

Frequent collaborators in Richters' academic work include Anna Yeung, Chris Rissel, Kevin McGeechan, Richard de Visser, and Deborah Bateson, with multiple joint publications among these colleagues.

Their research findings have been published in various venues known for contributions to sexual health and public health disciplines, such as Archives of Sexual Behavior, The Journal of Sex Research, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, and Sexual Health.

Best Publications

  • Demographic and Psychosocial Features of Participants in Bondage and Discipline, “Sadomasochism” or Dominance and Submission (BDSM): Data from a National Survey

    Juliet Richters;Richard O. De Visser;Chris E. Rissel;Andrew E. Grulich

  • Sex in Australia: sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults.

    Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich

  • ‘I'm Telling You … The Language Barrier is the Most, the Biggest Challenge’: Barriers to Education among Karen Refugee Women in Australia

    Paula G. Watkins;Husna Razee;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: Sexual difficulties in a representative sample of adults

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • A Profile of Pornography Users in Australia: Findings From the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

    Chris Rissel;Juliet Richters;Richard O. de Visser;Alan McKee

  • Sex in Australia: the rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

    Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich

  • Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey.

    Juliet Richters;Richard de Visser;Chris Rissel;Anthony Smith

  • Prevalence and correlates of three types of pelvic pain in a nationally representative sample of Australian women.

    Marian K Pitts;Jason A Ferris;Anthony M A Smith;Julia M Shelley

  • Sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual men and women: the importance of desired frequency of sex

    Anthony Smith;Anthony Lyons;Jason Ferris;Juliet Richters

  • Who gets tattoos? Demographic and behavioral correlates of ever being tattooed in a representative sample of men and women.

    Wendy Heywood;Kent Patrick;Anthonry M. A. Smith;Judy M. Simpson

  • Sex in Australia: heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among a representative sample of adults.

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: autoerotic, esoteric and other sexual practices engaged in by a representative sample of adults.

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships

    Juliet Richters;Dennis Altman;Paul B. Badcock;Paul B. Badcock;Anthony M. A. Smith

  • Sex in Australia: Sexually transmissible infection and blood‐borne virus history in a representative sample of adults

    Andrew E Grulich;Richard O de Visser;Anthony M A Smith;Chris E Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: first experiences of vaginal intercourse and oral sex among a representative sample of adults

    Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser

  • Associations Between Religiosity and Sexuality in a Representative Sample of Australian Adults

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M. A. Smith;Juliet Richters;Chris E. Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: homosexual experience and recent homosexual encounters.

    Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel

  • Sex in Australia: experiences of sexual coercion among a representative sample of adults.

    Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith;Chris E. Rissel;Juliet Richters

  • Sex in Australia: contraceptive practices among a representative sample of women

    Juliet Richters;Andrew E. Grulich;Richard O. de Visser;Anthony M.A. Smith

  • Smoking and erectile dysfunction: findings from a representative sample of Australian men

    C Millett;L M Wen;C Rissel;A Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Rissel
Chris Rissel Flinders University
Andrew E. Grulich
Andrew E. Grulich University of New South Wales
Richard O. de Visser
Richard O. de Visser University of Sussex
Anthony M. A. Smith
Anthony M. A. Smith La Trobe University
Judy M. Simpson
Judy M. Simpson University of Sydney
Marian Pitts
Marian Pitts La Trobe University
Tony Butler
Tony Butler University of New South Wales
Jason Ferris
Jason Ferris University of Queensland
Garrett Prestage
Garrett Prestage University of New South Wales
Susan Kippax
Susan Kippax University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning is transforming access to Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA. More students are choosing flexible paths that fit their schedules and budgets. For those interested in advanced study, there are masters in social work accelerated programs that let you complete an MSW degree in less time, helping you fast-track your career in social work.

If you're drawn to understanding human behavior, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online provides the academic foundation needed for roles in mental health, education, and business. Affordability is also crucial – those seeking counseling credentials can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) to prepare for licensure while minimizing costs.

For students considering family therapy, online marriage and family therapy masters programs deliver specialized training to support families and couples in a range of settings. These flexible programs open doors to diverse career pathways in social services, education, and private practice—all through accessible online study.

Best Scientists Citing Juliet Richters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles