World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 121 3576 3343 1969 1818 1031 61041

Mark R. Gilbert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark R. Gilbert between 1973 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark R. Gilbert published across 54 years, from 1973 to 2026, averaging 22.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 136 publications in 2023. 41 of the 1,217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 136. Peak 136 publications in 2023. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 57 publications 2014: 81 publications 2015: 75 publications 2016: 51 publications 2017: 95 publications 2018: 78 publications 2019: 94 publications 2020: 67 publications 2021: 88 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 136 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 40 publications 2026: 1 publication
1973 2026

1,217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark R. Gilbert: publications per year, 1973 to 2026
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 4
1990 1
1991 3
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 7
2001 4
2002 5
2003 9
2004 14
2005 16
2006 22
2007 19
2008 22
2009 17
2010 31
2011 44
2012 46
2013 57
2014 81
2015 75
2016 51
2017 95
2018 78
2019 94
2020 67
2021 88
2022 39
2023 136
2024 37
2025 40
2026 1
Total 1,217
Download as CSV

Mark R. Gilbert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,021–1,040 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,031 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70 1,031
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark R. Gilbert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 121
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark R. Gilbert is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their primary fields of study include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broad areas, their work spans various subfields such as Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, and Cancer Research.

Their research focuses on topics including:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Mark R. Gilbert has contributed to numerous scientific publications, frequently collaborating with a network of co-authors such as Terri S. Armstrong, Marta Peñas-Prado, Elizabeth Vera, Kenneth Aldape, and Jing Wu. Their work is regularly published in key academic venues including:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancers

Several of their recent papers include:

  • "Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions," 2020, Neuro-Oncology
  • "Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001," 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "IDH mutation in glioma: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets," 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • "RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults," 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "cIMPACT-NOW update 7: advancing the molecular classification of ependymal tumors," 2020, Brain Pathology

In addition to research articles, Mark R. Gilbert has published books, including a title with Rowman & Littlefield: Historical Dictionary of Modern Italy (2020).

Best Publications

  • Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group

    Patrick Y. Wen;David R. Macdonald;David A. Reardon;Timothy F. Cloughesy

  • A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

    Mark R. Gilbert;James J. Dignam;Terri S. Armstrong;Terri S. Armstrong;Jeffrey Scott Wefel

  • Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades, and Age Groups

    Kristian W. Pajtler;Kristian W. Pajtler;Hendrik Witt;Martin Sill;David T.W. Jones

  • Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

    Mark R. Gilbert;Meihua Wang;Kenneth D. Aldape;Roger Stupp

  • Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma

    Jan C. Buckner;Edward G. Shaw;Stephanie L. Pugh;Arnab Chakravarti

  • Correlation of O6-Methylguanine Methyltransferase (MGMT) Promoter Methylation With Clinical Outcomes in Glioblastoma and Clinical Strategies to Modulate MGMT Activity

    Monika E. Hegi;Lili Liu;James G. Herman;Roger Stupp

  • Immunologic Escape After Prolonged Progression-Free Survival With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant III Peptide Vaccination in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

    John H. Sampson;Amy B Heimberger;Gary E. Archer;Kenneth D. Aldape

  • Clinical Cancer Advances 2013: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology

    Jyoti D. Patel;Lada Krilov;Sylvia Adams;Carol Aghajanian

  • Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001.

    Paul D. Brown;Vinai Gondi;Stephanie Pugh;Wolfgang A. Tome

  • Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group.

    Hideho Okada;Michael Weller;Raymond Huang;Gaetano Finocchiaro

  • Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system

    Victor A. Levin;Luc Bidaut;Ping Hou;Ashok J Kumar

  • Challenges to curing primary brain tumours

    Kenneth Aldape;Kevin M Brindle;Louis Chesler;Rajesh Chopra

  • Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials

    Benjamin M. Ellingson;Martin Bendszus;Martin Bendszus;Jerrold Boxerman;Daniel Barboriak

  • Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions.

    Roger Stupp;Monika E. Hegi;Mark R. Gilbert;Arnab Chakravarti

  • Sequences of Taxol and Cisplatin: A Phase I and Pharmacologic Study

    E K Rowinsky;M R Gilbert;W P McGuire;D A Noe

  • Prognostic effect of epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

    Amy B Heimberger;Roman Hlatky;Dima Suki;David Yang

  • Phase I/II Study of Imatinib Mesylate for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 99-08

    Patrick Y. Wen;W. K Alfred Yung;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Patricia L. Dahia

  • MGMT promoter methylation is predictive of response to radiotherapy and prognostic in the absence of adjuvant alkylating chemotherapy for glioblastoma.

    Andreana L. Rivera;Christopher E. Pelloski;Mark R. Gilbert;Howard Colman

  • Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas.

    Kathleen R. Lamborn;W. K.Alfred Yung;Susan M. Chang;Patrick Y. Wen

Frequent Co-Authors

Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore
W. K. Alfred Yung
W. K. Alfred Yung The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Paul D. Brown
Paul D. Brown Mayo Clinic
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco
Timothy F. Cloughesy
Timothy F. Cloughesy University of California, Los Angeles
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Lisa M. DeAngelis
Lisa M. DeAngelis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Tito R. Mendoza
Tito R. Mendoza The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David A. Reardon
David A. Reardon Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA can open the door to a broad range of exciting healthcare careers. However, not all students can commit to the time and expense of traditional medical school. Fortunately, there are flexible, affordable online options in related fields that offer rewarding career pathways.

For those interested in patient care through pharmaceutical science, pursuing pharmacy school online accredited programs can be a smart alternative. These programs allow students to earn their credentials remotely while preparing for pharmacy licensure.

If you’re drawn to healthcare systems and data, a bachelor of health information management online equips learners for roles managing sensitive medical records and technology.

Another in-demand path is medical coding. Earning a medical coding certification online leads to opportunities in medical offices, insurance, and hospital administration.

Aspiring nurses can also find more accessible routes with the cheapest np school online options, which prepare advanced practice nurses for clinical leadership roles.

Each of these online programs offers unique benefits, helping students begin or advance in healthcare without the commitment of a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Gilbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles