World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
31878
World Ranking
12605
National Ranking
6445

Randall K. Ten Haken publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall K. Ten Haken sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Randall K. Ten Haken D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall K. Ten Haken sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randall K. Ten Haken is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research activity is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Artificial Intelligence, and Hepatology.

Their scholarly output spans various topics related to medical science and technology, with key areas of work composed of:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Randall K. Ten Haken has contributed to multiple scientific publications, especially in high-visibility venues such as:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • UNC Libraries
  • Medical Physics
  • Scientific Reports
  • British Journal of Radiology

Some of the recent papers associated with or relevant to their research circle include:

  • Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists, 2020, Medical Physics
  • Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century, 2020, British Journal of Radiology
  • Integrating Multiomics Information in Deep Learning Architectures for Joint Actuarial Outcome Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Radiation Therapy, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Quantum deep reinforcement learning for clinical decision support in oncology: application to adaptive radiotherapy, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • A clinical decision support system for AI-assisted decision-making in response-adaptive radiotherapy (ARCliDS), 2023, Scientific Reports

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • M.M. Matuszak
  • Issam El Naqa
  • Kyle C. Cuneo
  • Theodore S. Lawrence
  • Dipesh Niraula

Best Publications

  • Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.

    Lawrence B. Marks;Ellen D. Yorke;Andrew Jackson;Randall K. Ten Haken

  • Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): An Introduction to the Scientific Issues

    Søren M. Bentzen;Louis S. Constine;Joseph O. Deasy;Avi Eisbruch

  • Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer

    A. Eisbruch;R.K. Ten Haken;H.M. Kim;L.H. Marsh

  • Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: An analysis of pooled data of 540 patients

    Stefan L.S. Kwa;Joos V. Lebesque;Jacqueline C.M. Theuws;Lawrence B. Marks

  • Analysis of radiation-induced liver disease using the Lyman NTCP model.

    Laura A. Dawson;Daniel Normolle;James M. Balter;Cornelius J. McGinn

  • Radiation-Associated Liver Injury

    Charlie C. Pan;Brian D. Kavanagh;Laura A. Dawson;X. Allen Li

  • A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations

    Anthony E. Lujan;Edward W. Larsen;James M. Balter;Randall K. Ten Haken

  • High-dose radiation improved local tumor control and overall survival in patients with inoperable/unresectable non–small-cell lung cancer: Long-term results of a radiation dose escalation study

    Feng Ming Kong;Randall K. Ten Haken;Matthew J. Schipper;Molly A. Sullivan

  • Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in the Stomach and Small Bowel

    Brian D. Kavanagh;Charlie C. Pan;Laura A. Dawson;Shiva K. Das

  • Comparing different NTCP models that predict the incidence of radiation pneumonitis

    Yvette Seppenwoolde;Joos V. Lebesque;Katrien de Jaeger;José S.A. Belderbos

  • Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing

    James M. Balter;Randall K. Ten Haken;Theodore S. Lawrence;Kwok L. Lam

  • Escalated Focal Liver Radiation and Concurrent Hepatic Artery Fluorodeoxyuridine for Unresectable Intrahepatic Malignancies

    Laura A. Dawson;Cornelius J. McGinn;Daniel Normolle;Randall K. Ten Haken

  • Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non-small cell lung cancer patients

    Mary Kaye Martel;Randall K. Ten Haken;Mark B. Hazuka;Marc L. Kessler

  • Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers

    James M. Balter;Howard M. Sandler;Kwok Lam;Robert L. Bree

  • Final toxicity results of a radiation-dose escalation study in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): predictors for radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis.

    Feng Ming Kong;Feng Ming Kong;James A. Hayman;Kent A. Griffith;Gregory P. Kalemkerian

  • The Use of 3-D Dose Volume Analysis to Predict Radiation Hepatitis

    Theodore S. Lawrence;Randall K. Ten Haken;Marc L. Kessler;John M. Robertson

  • Dose Escalation in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy: Update of a Phase I Trial

    James A. Hayman;Mary K. Martel;Randall K. Ten Haken;Daniel P. Normolle

  • Phase II Trial of High-Dose Conformal Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Hepatic Artery Floxuridine for Unresectable Intrahepatic Malignancies

    Edgar Ben-Josef;Daniel Normolle;William D. Ensminger;Suzette Walker

  • The reproducibility of organ position using active breathing control (ABC) during liver radiotherapy.

    Laura A Dawson;Kristy K Brock;Sahira Kazanjian;Dwight Fitch

  • Partial Volume Tolerance of the Liver to Radiation

    Laura A. Dawson;Randall K. Ten Haken

Frequent Co-Authors

Theodore S. Lawrence
Theodore S. Lawrence University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Avraham Eisbruch
Avraham Eisbruch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Laura A. Dawson
Laura A. Dawson Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Howard M. Sandler
Howard M. Sandler Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Kirk A. Frey
Kirk A. Frey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lawrence B. Marks
Lawrence B. Marks University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas L. Chenevert
Thomas L. Chenevert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Larry Junck
Larry Junck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark B. Orringer
Mark B. Orringer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Jeremy M. G. Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to explore. Choosing the right educational track can help you enter the healthcare field faster and more affordably. For nurses already holding an RN license, the cheapest rn to bsn online programs offer a cost-effective way to earn your BSN and access more advanced roles.

Non-nurses interested in a quick transition to the nursing profession can investigate direct entry online msn programs. These accelerated options allow you to earn a Master's in Nursing without a prior nursing degree.

If admission competitiveness is a concern, look into nursing programs with high acceptance rates. These schools provide valuable opportunities for students who may not have top academic credentials yet are passionate about healthcare.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider exploring medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid options. This pathway offers strong career prospects with the flexibility of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Randall K. Ten Haken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles