World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7580
World Ranking
9235
National Ranking
3931

Richard P. Martin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Martin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard P. Martin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard P. Martin is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within computer science and engineering.

The scientist's work focuses on various areas, including:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Wireless Body Area Networks
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance

Main fields of study for Richard P. Martin include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Subfields of study where they have contributed include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Richard P. Martin has published in several frequent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • Internet of Things
  • Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
  • GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference

Recent papers by Richard P. Martin include:

  • "An Accelerator for Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks Leveraging Systolic General Matrix-matrix Multiplication," 2022, ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • "Unobtrusive patient identification using smart pill-bottle systems," 2021, Internet of Things
  • "The performance of the Dharan-Dhankuta Road, east Nepal, in the context of the Fookes et al. (1985) mountain model: a tribute to the late Professor PG Fookes," 2022, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
  • "Synergistic CPU-FPGA Acceleration of Sparse Linear Algebra," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "SPOTS: An Accelerator for Sparse Convolutional Networks Leveraging Systolic General Matrix-Matrix Multiplication," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors associated with Richard P. Martin include:

  • Mohammadreza Soltaniyeh
  • Santosh Nagarakatte
  • Jorge Ortiz
  • Murtadha Aldeer
  • Richard Howard

Best Publications

  • The limits of localization using signal strength: a comparative study

    E. Elnahrawy;Xiaoyan Li;R.P. Martin

  • Design for wearability

    F. Gemperle;C. Kasabach;J. Stivoric;M. Bauer

  • Detecting and Localizing Wireless Spoofing Attacks

    Yingying Chen;W. Trappe;R.P. Martin

  • Bayesian indoor positioning systems

    D. Madigan;E. Einahrawy;R.P. Martin;W.-H. Ju

  • PlanetP: using gossiping to build content addressable peer-to-peer information sharing communities

    F.M. Cuenca-Acuna;C. Peery;R.P. Martin;T.D. Nguyen

  • Effects of communication latency, overhead, and bandwidth in a cluster architecture

    Richard P. Martin;Amin M. Vahdat;David E. Culler;Thomas E. Anderson

  • Detecting driver phone use leveraging car speakers

    Jie Yang;Simon Sidhom;Gayathri Chandrasekaran;Tam Vu

  • A Practical Approach to Landmark Deployment for Indoor Localization

    Yingying Chen;John-austen Francisco;Wade Trappe;Richard Martin

  • Detecting and Localizing Identity-Based Attacks in Wireless and Sensor Networks

    Yingying Chen;Jie Yang;Wade Trappe;Richard P Martin

  • Assessing fast network interfaces

    D.E. Culler;Lok Tin Liu;R.P. Martin;C.O. Yoshikawa

  • Sensing vehicle dynamics for determining driver phone use

    Yan Wang;Jie Yang;Hongbo Liu;Yingying Chen

  • The design of a wearable computer

    Len Bass;Chris Kasabach;Richard Martin;Dan Siewiorek

  • Understanding and dealing with operator mistakes in internet services

    Kiran Nagaraja;Fábio Oliveira;Ricardo Bianchini;Richard P. Martin

  • Architectural Requirements and Scalability of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks

    Frederick C. Wong;Richard P. Martin;Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau;David E. Culler

  • Improving cluster availability using workstation validation

    Taliver Heath;Richard P. Martin;Thu D. Nguyen

  • HPAM: an active message layer for a network of hp workstations

    R.P. Martin

  • Fast parallel sorting under LogP: experience with the CM-5

    A.C. Dusseau;D.E. Culler;K.E. Schauser;R.P. Martin

  • DMap: A Shared Hosting Scheme for Dynamic Identifier to Locator Mappings in the Global Internet

    Tam Vu;Akash Baid;Yanyong Zhang;Thu D. Nguyen

  • A Review of Medication Adherence Monitoring Technologies

    Murtadha Aldeer;Mehdi Javanmard;Richard P. Martin

  • Empirical Evaluation of the Limits on Localization Using Signal Strength

    Gayathri Chandrasekaran;Mesut Ali Ergin;Jie Yang;Song Liu

  • Autonomous replication for high availability in unstructured P2P systems

    Cuenca-Acunam Fm;R.P. Martin;T.D. Nguyen

  • Tracking human queues using single-point signal monitoring

    Yan Wang;Jie Yang;Yingying Chen;Hongbo Liu

  • The robustness of localization algorithms to signal strength attacks: a comparative study

    Yingying Chen;Konstantinos Kleisouris;Xiaoyan Li;Wade Trappe

Frequent Co-Authors

Yingying Chen
Yingying Chen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thu D. Nguyen
Thu D. Nguyen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marco Gruteser
Marco Gruteser Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Robert J. Newport
Robert J. Newport University of Kent
Richard Howard
Richard Howard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Barrie Mecrow
Barrie Mecrow Newcastle University
Ricardo Bianchini
Ricardo Bianchini Microsoft (United States)
Jonathan C. Knowles
Jonathan C. Knowles University College London
David E. Culler
David E. Culler University of California, Berkeley
Mark E. Smith
Mark E. Smith University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of specialized online degrees and career opportunities. Today, many students opt for highly accredited online universities to ensure their education meets national standards and supports career advancement.

The world of technology is diverse. For those interested in creative roles, an online game design degree provides skills in programming, storytelling, and interactive design—ideal for launching a career in the booming gaming industry.

Cybersecurity remains a top priority for businesses worldwide. Pursuing cybersecurity online degrees can prepare graduates for high-demand roles protecting digital assets, networks, and sensitive information.

Technology also integrates with fields like construction. Students interested in project management and technology can find affordable options by exploring online construction management degree cost to jumpstart a management career in construction and engineering projects.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles