World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7605 7335 42 42 251 7604

Ibrahim A. Hameed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ibrahim A. Hameed between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ibrahim A. Hameed published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 71 publications in 2024. 103 of the 320 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 71. Peak 71 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 71 publications 2025: 32 publications
2004 2025

320 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ibrahim A. Hameed: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 5
2011 7
2012 2
2013 2
2014 5
2015 3
2016 15
2017 11
2018 16
2019 15
2020 19
2021 42
2022 35
2023 33
2024 71
2025 32
Total 320
Download as CSV

Ibrahim A. Hameed publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ibrahim A. Hameed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 251 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 251
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Ibrahim A. Hameed D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ibrahim A. Hameed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Ibrahim A. Hameed is affiliated with NTNU Technology Transfer in Norway and has a substantial body of research spanning computer science and engineering disciplines. Their work includes a broad focus on artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, and information systems.

Their research interests cover a range of topics, including:

  • Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • COVID-19 Diagnosis Using AI
  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics

Hameed has contributed to numerous publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • IEEE Access
  • Applied Sciences
  • Sensors
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Energy Research

Some of their recent notable papers include:

  • "A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Cyber Security in the Last Decade," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "A Review of Content-Based and Context-Based Recommendation Systems," 2021, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
  • "A Comparative Performance Analysis of Data Resampling Methods on Imbalance Medical Data," 2021, IEEE Access
  • "Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity," 2020, Energies
  • "Drone Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Review," 2021, Electronics

In the area of book publications, Hameed has contributed to a work published by IntechOpen titled "Next-Generation Greenhouses for Food Security" in 2021.

The scientist regularly collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ahmad Taher Azar
  • Kamran Shaukat
  • Suhuai Luo
  • Karam M. Sallam
  • Mohamed Abdel-Basset

Best Publications

  • Research and development in agricultural robotics: a perspective of digital farming.

    Redmond Ramin Shamshiri;Cornelia Weltzien;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Ian J. Yule

  • A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Cyber Security in the Last Decade

    Kamran Shaukat;Suhuai Luo;Vijay Varadharajan;Ibrahim A. Hameed

  • A Review of Content-Based and Context-Based Recommendation Systems

    Umair Javed;Kamran Shaukat;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Farhat Iqbal

  • A Comparative Performance Analysis of Data Resampling Methods on Imbalance Medical Data

    Matloob Khushi;Kamran Shaukat;Talha Mahboob Alam;Ibrahim A. Hameed

  • Drone Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Review

    Ahmad Taher Azar;Anis Koubaa;Nada Ali Mohamed;Habiba A. Ibrahim

  • Intelligent Coverage Path Planning for Agricultural Robots and Autonomous Machines on Three-Dimensional Terrain

    I. A. Hameed

  • An Investigation of Credit Card Default Prediction in the Imbalanced Datasets

    Talha Mahboob Alam;Kamran Shaukat;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Suhuai Luo

  • A Bibliometric Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Social Sciences: A Review of Influential Aspects and Conceptual Structure

    Adeel Nasir;Kamran Shaukat;Kamran Shaukat;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Suhuai Luo

  • Using Gaussian membership functions for improving the reliability and robustness of students' evaluation systems

    Ibrahim A. Hameed

  • An Optimized Field Coverage Planning Approach for Navigation of Agricultural Robots in Fields Involving Obstacle Areas

    Ibahim Hameed;Dionysis Bochtis;Claus Aage Grøn Sørensen

  • Side-to-side 3D coverage path planning approach for agricultural robots to minimize skip/overlap areas between swaths

    I.A. Hameed;A. la Cour-Harbo;O.L. Osen

  • A Review of Time-Series Anomaly Detection Techniques: A Step to Future Perspectives

    Kamran Shaukat;Talha Mahboob Alam;Suhuai Luo;Shakir Shabbir

  • Robotics and Intelligent Systems Against a Pandemic

    A. Khamis;J. Meng;J. Wang;A. T. Azar

  • Automatic Visual Features for Writer Identification: A Deep Learning Approach

    Arshia Rehman;Saeeda Naz;Muhammad Imran Razzak;Ibrahim A. Hameed

  • Automated generation of guidance lines for operational field planning

    I.A. Hameed;D.D. Bochtis;C.G. Sørensen;M. Nøremark

  • Driving Angle and Track Sequence Optimization for Operational Path Planning Using Genetic Algorithms

    I. A. Hameed;D. D. Bochtis;C. G. Sorensen

  • A social VR-based collaborative exergame for rehabilitation: codesign, development and user study

    Unknown

  • What is Core and What Future Holds for Blockchain Technologies and Cryptocurrencies: A Bibliometric Analysis

    Adeel Nasir;Kamran Shaukat;Kanwal Iqbal Khan;Ibrahim A. Hameed

  • A novel framework for prognostic factors identification of malignant mesothelioma through association rule mining

    Talha Mahboob Alam;Kamran Shaukat;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Wasim Ahmad Khan

  • A GA-Based Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Controller for Greenhouse Climate Control System

    S. Mohamed;Ibrahim Hameed

  • Optimized driving direction based on a three-dimensional field representation

    I. A. Hameed;D. D. Bochtis;C. G. SøRensen;A. L. Jensen

  • Fundamental Research on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Support Precision Agriculture in Oil Palm Plantations

    Redmond Ramin Shamshiri;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Siva K. Balasundram;Desa Ahmad

  • An object-oriented model for simulating agricultural in-field machinery activities

    I. A. Hameed;D. D. Bochtis;C. G. Sørensen;S. Vougioukas

  • Developing the modified R-numbers for risk-based fuzzy information fusion and its application to failure modes, effects, and system resilience analysis (FMESRA).

    Hamidreza Seiti;Mahdi Fathi;Ashkan Hafezalkotob;Enrique Herrera-Viedma

  • A Dynamic Three-Bit Image Steganography Algorithm for Medical and e-Healthcare Systems

    Ghazanfar Farooq Siddiqui;Muhammad Zafar Iqbal;Khalid Saleem;Zafar Saeed

  • Tramline establishment in controlled traffic farming based on operational machinery cost

    D. D. Bochtis;C. G. Sørensen;Patrizia Busato;I. A. Hameed

  • Robust Sparse Representation and Multiclass Support Matrix Machines for the Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Signals

    Imran Razzak;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Guandong Xu

  • Simulation software and virtual environments for acceleration of agricultural robotics: Features highlights and performance comparison

    Redmond Ramin Shamshiri;Ibrahim A. Hameed;Lenka Pitonakova;Cornelia Weltzien

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus G. Sørensen
Claus G. Sørensen Aarhus University
Dionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis Aarhus University
Zheng-Hua Tan
Zheng-Hua Tan Aalborg University
Kelly R. Thorp
Kelly R. Thorp Agricultural Research Service
Muhammad Sultan
Muhammad Sultan Bahauddin Zakariya University
Ashkan Hafezalkotob
Ashkan Hafezalkotob La Trobe University
Vijay Varadharajan
Vijay Varadharajan University of Newcastle Australia
Girish Chowdhary
Girish Chowdhary University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jee-Hwan Ryu
Jee-Hwan Ryu Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Lars J. Munkholm
Lars J. Munkholm Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in broadening your career options beyond engineering and technology, there are many online degrees that offer exciting and versatile career pathways. Today, a variety of online programs are tailored for tech-savvy learners and those seeking flexible learning schedules.

For example, students who want to apply analytical skills to the legal field may consider aba-approved paralegal programs. These can open doors to roles in legal research, compliance, or contracts management.

Another popular path is a masters in human resources, which prepares graduates for talent management, organizational development, and corporate leadership roles.

If you’re drawn to digital storytelling or public relations, an online masters in communication can help you master effective messaging in tech-driven industries.

Aspiring innovators might be interested in an mba entrepreneurship online, equipping professionals with the skills to launch startups or lead business growth in technology-focused sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Ibrahim A. Hameed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles