World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
9976
World Ranking
5121
National Ranking
74

Lambert Schomaker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schomaker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 257 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lambert Schomaker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lambert Schomaker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Lambert Schomaker is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and has a primary research focus in the field of Computer Science. Their body of work encompasses over 100 publications, with 71 specifically in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and significant contributions in Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's research concentrates on topics such as:

  • Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Several recent publications highlight the scope of their expertise. These include:

  • FragNet: Writer Identification Using Deep Fragment Networks (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • One-vs-One classification for deep neural networks (2020), published in Pattern Recognition
  • GR-RNN: Global-context residual recurrent neural networks for writer identification (2021), published in Pattern Recognition
  • Feature-extraction methods for historical manuscript dating based on writing style development (2020), published in Pattern Recognition Letters
  • Artificial intelligence based writer identification generates new evidence for the unknown scribes of the Dead Sea Scrolls exemplified by the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa) (2021), published in PLoS ONE

Lambert Schomaker's work frequently appears in publication venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
  • Neural Computing and Applications
  • Pattern Recognition

The scientist collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, with notable frequent collaborators including Zhenxing Zhang, Maruf A. Dhali, Davide Cipollini, Marco Wiering, and Mladen Popović.

Best Publications

  • Text-Independent Writer Identification and Verification Using Textural and Allographic Features

    M. Bulacu;L. Schomaker

  • UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and recognizer benchmarks

    I. Guyon;L. Schomaker;R. Plamondon;M. Liberman

  • Text detection from natural scene images: towards a system for visually impaired persons

    N. Ezaki;M. Bulacu;L. Schomaker

  • Automatic writer identification using connected-component contours and edge-based features of uppercase Western script

    L. Schomaker;M. Bulacu

  • Writer identification using edge-based directional features

    M. Bulacu;L. Schomaker;L. Vuurpijl

  • An overview and comparison of voting methods for pattern recognition

    M. van Erp;L. Vuurpijl;L. Schomaker

  • 2009 IEEE-RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS

    Geert Kootstra;Lambert Schomaker

  • IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence

    Mahir Karaaba;Olarik Surinta;Lambert Schomaker;Marco Wiering

  • Variants of the Borda count method for combining ranked classifier hypotheses

    Merijn van Erp;Lambert Schomaker

  • Writer identification using directional ink-trace width measurements

    A. A. Brink;J. Smit;M. L. Bulacu;L. R. B. Schomaker

  • Text-Independent Writer Identification and Verification on Offline Arabic Handwriting

    M. Bulacu;L. Schomaker;A. Brink

  • Using codebooks of fragmented connected-component contours in forensic and historic writer identification

    Lambert Schomaker;Katrin Franke;Marius Bulacu

  • A taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System

    Lambert Schomaker

  • Effects of motor programming on the power spectral density function of finger and wrist movements

    G. P. Van Galen;R. R. A. Van Doorn;L. R. B. Schomaker

  • Junction detection in handwritten documents and its application to writer identification

    Sheng He;Marco Wiering;Lambert Schomaker

  • Advances in Writer Identification and Verification

    L.R.B. Schomaker

  • Predicting Eye Fixations on Complex Visual Stimuli Using Local Symmetry

    Gert Kootstra;Bart de Boer;Lambert R. B. Schomaker

  • Using stroke- or character-based self-organizing maps in the recognition of on-line, connected cursive script

    Lambert Schomaker

  • Using Pen-Based Outlines for Object-Based Annotation and Image-Based Queries

    Lambert Schomaker;Edward de Leau;Louis Vuurpijl

  • Tenth international workshop on frontiers in handwriting recognition

    Guy Lorette;Horst Bunke;Lambert Schomaker

  • Automatic writer identification using fragmented connected-component contours

    L. Schomaker;M. Bulacu;K. Franke

  • Audio visual and Multimodal Speech Systems

    Christian Benoit;Jean Claude Martin;Catherine Pelachaud;Lambert Schomaker

  • Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004

    Nobuo Ezaki;Marius Bulacu;Lambert Schomaker

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Wiering
Marco Wiering University of Groningen
Isabelle Guyon
Isabelle Guyon University of Paris-Saclay
Réjean Plamondon
Réjean Plamondon Polytechnique Montréal
Jos B. T. M. Roerdink
Jos B. T. M. Roerdink University of Groningen
Daniel P. Lopresti
Daniel P. Lopresti Lehigh University
Rohini K. Srihari
Rohini K. Srihari University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Morris A. Swertz
Morris A. Swertz University Medical Center Groningen
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Konrad Kuijken
Konrad Kuijken Leiden University
Hado van Hasselt
Hado van Hasselt University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens a gateway to various related online degrees and expanding career pathways. Many students consider specialized fields such as cyber security schools online to gain expertise in digital safety and information protection. These online programs are ideal for flexible learning and adapting to the fast-changing tech landscape.

Career options are not limited to traditional IT roles. For those interested in management and the built environment, construction management courses offer the skills needed to oversee projects and teams, combining technology with real-world leadership.

Beyond technology and construction, degrees focusing on criminal justice and business remain popular. Understanding the cost of criminal justice degree programs can help you plan for a career in law enforcement, legal studies, or public safety roles. Likewise, pursuing an online accounting degree equips you for in-demand finance and data analysis careers.

These online pathways are affordable, flexible, and designed for career readiness, making them excellent choices for students with diverse interests.

Best Scientists Citing Lambert Schomaker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles