World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
7296
World Ranking
6594
National Ranking
140

Jocelyne Troccaz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyne Troccaz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jocelyne Troccaz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyne Troccaz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to robotics and imaging for medical applications

Overview

Jocelyne Troccaz is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France, contributing extensively to the fields of medicine and engineering. Their work primarily intersects biomedical engineering, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, computer vision and pattern recognition, and physiology.

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques

Troccaz has published in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Medical Physics
  • Progrès en Urologie - FMC
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine

Recent publications include:

  • Image-Guided Interventional Robotics: Lost in Translation? (2022), Proceedings of the IEEE
  • Cosserat Rod Modeling of Continuum Robots from Newtonian and Lagrangian Perspectives (2023), IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • Learning curve for fusion magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography segmentation (2024), British Journal of Urology
  • Multi-eXpert fusion: An ensemble learning framework to segment 3D TRUS prostate images (2022), Medical Physics
  • Impact of Relative Volume Difference Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Segmentation on Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Fusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy (2023), European Urology Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Troccaz include Clément Beitone, Sandrine Voros, Louis Lenfant, Pierre Mozer, and Morgan Rouprêt.

In 2018, Troccaz was named an IEEE Fellow for contributions to robotics and imaging for medical applications.

Best Publications

  • Robot for guiding movements and control method

    Stéphane Lavallee;Jocelyne Troccaz

  • Localised medical instrument with tilt and swivel screen

    Stéphane Lavallee;Jocelyne Troccaz

  • A new robot architecture for tele-echography

    A. Vilchis;J. Troccaz;P. Cinquin;K. Masuda

  • Computer‐assisted spine surgery: A technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3‐D optical localizer

    S Lavallée;P Sautot;J Troccaz;P Cinquin

  • Image guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery

    S. Lavallee;J. Troccaz;L. Gaborit;P. Cinquin

  • Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty.

    E. Stindel;J.L. Briard;P. Merloz;S. Plaweski

  • Computer assisted medical interventions

    P. Cinquin;E. Bainville;C. Barbe;E. Bittar

  • Automated Segmentation of the Prostate in 3D MR Images Using a Probabilistic Atlas and a Spatially Constrained Deformable Model

    Sébastien Martin;Jocelyne Troccaz;Vincent Daanen

  • CVRMed-MRCAS'97

    Jocelyne Troccaz;Eric Grimson;Ralph Mösges

  • Frontiers of Medical Robotics: From Concept to Systems to Clinical Translation.

    Jocelyne Troccaz;Giulio Dagnino;Guang-Zhong Yang

  • MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results

    Christophe Reynier;Jocelyne Troccaz;Philippe Fourneret;Andrée Dusserre

  • Computer assisted spine surgery.

    Philippe Merloz;Jérome Tonetti;Ahmad Eid;Claude Faure

  • Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery

    P. Merloz;J. Tonetti;L. Pittet;M. Coulomb

  • Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.

    Philippe Merloz;Jocelyne Troccaz;Hervé Vouaillat;Christian Vasile

  • TER: A System for Robotic Tele-echography

    Adriana Vilchis Gonzales;Philippe Cinquin;Jocelyne Troccaz;Agnès Guerraz

  • Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy.

    Jerome Tonetti;Lionel Carrat;Sorin Blendea;Philippe Merloz

  • Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation.

    Michael Baumann;Pierre Mozer;Vincent Daanen;Jocelyne Troccaz

  • Semi-active guiding systems in surgery. A two-dof prototype of the passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC)

    Jocelyne Troccaz;Yves Delnondedieu

  • The use of localizers, robots and synergistic devices in CAS

    Jocelyne Troccaz;Michael A. Peshkin;Brian L. Davies

  • A realistic deformable prostate phantom for multimodal imaging and needle-insertion procedures.

    Nikolai Hungr;Jean-Alexandre Long;Vincent Beix;Jocelyne Troccaz

  • Guiding systems for computer-assisted surgery: introducing synergistic devices and discussing the different approaches

    Jocelyne Troccaz;Michael A. Peshkin;Brian L. Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Cinquin
Philippe Cinquin Grenoble Alpes University
Yohan Payan
Yohan Payan Grenoble Alpes University
Laurence Nigay
Laurence Nigay Grenoble Alpes University
Christian Laugier
Christian Laugier French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Maud Marchal
Maud Marchal French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Michael A. Peshkin
Michael A. Peshkin Northwestern University
Dan Stoianovici
Dan Stoianovici Johns Hopkins University
Eva Comperat
Eva Comperat Sorbonne University
Guang-Zhong Yang
Guang-Zhong Yang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Guillaume Morel
Guillaume Morel Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a wide range of careers and degree options. Many students consider flexible pathways to enter the tech industry or complement their knowledge. For those looking for a swift start, a degree in 6 months online can offer foundational skills and a quick entry into tech-related fields.

Business skills are also highly valued in technology roles. Those interested in combining computer science knowledge with management should consider programs offered by online business schools. These can provide a cost-effective way to build business acumen alongside IT expertise.

Students mindful of budget can explore the cheapest online university options to receive a high-quality education without incurring heavy debt. There are also specialized pathways, such as an online bachelor's in engineering, for those interested in more technical roles that intersect with computer science.

Carefully considering these related degrees can help you map out a career path that blends your interests, maximizes affordability, and enhances your career prospects in today’s digital economy.

Best Scientists Citing Jocelyne Troccaz

Trending Scientists