World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 42 5277 4875 91 87 173 6403

Martijn J. Booij publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martijn J. Booij between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martijn J. Booij published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 25 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 9 publications
1988 2025

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martijn J. Booij: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 6
2003 3
2004 5
2005 7
2006 3
2007 9
2008 12
2009 9
2010 14
2011 9
2012 5
2013 15
2014 12
2015 17
2016 13
2017 10
2018 8
2019 9
2020 9
2021 21
2022 16
2023 6
2024 16
2025 9
Total 250
Download as CSV

Martijn J. Booij publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn J. Booij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 173 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 173
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Martijn J. Booij D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn J. Booij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277 42
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martijn J. Booij is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands, specializing in Environmental Science with a focus on applied research in hydrology. Their work spans several interrelated subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology.

The primary research topics covered by Booij include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Hydrological Forecasting Using AI, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Climate Variability and Models, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, and Cryospheric Studies and Observations.

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Booij illustrate the breadth of their expertise in hydrology and environmental modeling:

  • Water footprints and crop water use of 175 individual crops for 1990-2019 simulated with a global crop model, 2024, Scientific Data
  • Improving GALDIT-based groundwater vulnerability predictive mapping using coupled resampling algorithms and machine learning models, 2021, Journal of Hydrology
  • Separation of the Impact of Landuse/Landcover Change and Climate Change on Runoff in the Upstream Area of the Yangtze River, China, 2021, Water Resources Management
  • Improving daily stochastic streamflow prediction: comparison of novel hybrid data-mining algorithms, 2021, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Changes in monthly streamflow in the Hindukush-Karakoram-Himalaya Region of Pakistan using innovative polygon trend analysis, 2021, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

The venues in which Booij frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Water Resources Management
  • Water
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Booij collaborates regularly with a number of coauthors with repeated partnerships noted, such as:

  • Naveed Ahmed
  • Afshin Jahanshahi
  • Genxu Wang
  • Hero Marhaento
  • Joep F. Schyns

Through these collaborations and their publication record, Booij contributes to advancing understanding in environmental science, particularly related to hydrology, water resource management, and the applications of artificial intelligence for hydrological forecasting. Their work often integrates modeling approaches and novel data analysis techniques aimed at improving environmental and water systems' predictive capabilities.

Best Publications

  • The impact of climate change on the water resources of Hindukush–Karakorum–Himalaya region under different glacier coverage scenarios

    M. Akhtar;N. Ahmad;Martijn J. Booij

  • Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions

    Martijn J. Booij

  • Simulation and forecasting of streamflows using machine learning models coupled with base flow separation.

    Hakan Tongal;Martijn J. Booij

  • Limits to the world’s green water resources for food, feed, fiber, timber, and bioenergy

    Joep F. Schyns;Arjen Y. Hoekstra;Martijn J. Booij;Rick J. Hogeboom

  • The water footprint of Indonesian provinces related to the consumption of crop products

    F. Bulsink;Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra;Martijn J. Booij

  • Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models

    J. J. Warmink;J. A. E. B. Janssen;M. J. Booij;M. S. Krol

  • Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity

    Joseph Franciscus Schyns;Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra;Martijn J. Booij

  • Use of regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological models for the Hindukush-Karakorum-Himalaya region

    M. Akhtar;N. Ahmad;Martijn J. Booij

  • The influence of conceptual model structure on model performance: a comparative study for 237 French catchments

    W.R. van Esse;C. Perrin;Martijn J. Booij;Dionysius C.M. Augustijn

  • Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration

    T.H.M. Rientjes;L.P. Muthuwatta;L.P. Muthuwatta;M.G. Bos;Martijn J. Booij

  • Attribution of changes in the water balance of a tropical catchment to land use change using the SWAT model

    Hero Marhaento;Hero Marhaento;Martijn J. Booij;T.H.M. Rientjes;Arjen Y. Hoekstra;Arjen Y. Hoekstra

  • Hydrological response to future land-use change and climate change in a tropical catchment

    Hero Marhaento;Martijn J. Booij;Arjen Y. Hoekstra

  • Effect of different uncertainty sources on the skill of 10 day ensemble low flow forecasts for two hydrological models

    Mehmet C. Demirel;Martijn J. Booij;Arjen Y. Hoekstra

  • Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data

    V. Gholami;M.J. Booij;E. Nikzad Tehrani;M.A. Hadian

  • Extreme daily precipitation in Western Europe with climate change at appropriate spatial scales

    Martijn J. Booij

  • Improving GALDIT-based groundwater vulnerability predictive mapping using coupled resampling algorithms and machine learning models

    Rahim Barzegar;Rahim Barzegar;Siamak Razzagh;John Quilty;Jan Adamowski

  • Catchment Variability and Parameter Estimation in Multi-Objective Regionalisation of a Rainfall–Runoff Model

    Dave L. E. H. Deckers;Martijn J. Booij;Tom H. M. Rientjes;Maarten S. Krol

  • Probabilistic flood extent estimates from social media flood observations

    Tom Brouwer;Dirk Eilander;Arnejan van Loenen;Martijn J. Booij

  • Decision making under uncertainty in a decision support system for the Red River

    Inge A.T. de Kort;Martijn J. Booij

  • Assessment of roughness length schemes implemented within the Noah land surface model for high-altitude regions

    Donghai Zheng;R. van der Velde;Zhongbo Su;Martijn J. Booij

  • Appropriate Spatial Sampling of Rainfall or Flow Simulation

    Xiaohua Dong;C. Marjolein Dohmen-Janssen;Martijn J. Booij

  • Appropriate modelling of climate change impacts on river flooding

    Martijn Jan Booij

Frequent Co-Authors

Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra
Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra University of Twente
Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher
Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher University of Twente
Zhongbo Su
Zhongbo Su University of Twente
Kamal Ahmed
Kamal Ahmed Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Science
Amir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi Óbuda University
Charles Perrin
Charles Perrin University of Paris-Saclay
Mesfin Mekonnen
Mesfin Mekonnen University of Alabama
Stefan Uhlenbrook
Stefan Uhlenbrook International Water Management Institute
Vazken Andréassian
Vazken Andréassian University of Paris-Saclay
Zaher Mundher Yaseen
Zaher Mundher Yaseen King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse academic and career opportunities. For those considering further education later in life, there are excellent options tailored for non-traditional students. Programs highlighted in degrees for older adults demonstrate that age is no barrier to advancing your knowledge, including in scientific disciplines related to Earth Science.

Beyond Earth Science, interdisciplinary careers often benefit from skills in information management and research. Pursuing a library science degree can complement scientific expertise, helping professionals manage complex data or resources in environmental studies.

For those interested in digital information and technology, ALA accredited MLIS programs offer recognized online master's degrees in library and information science, which can lead to careers in data curation and archival work focused on environmental research.

Creative pathways also intersect with Earth Science, especially in documenting environmental change. Pursuing a bachelors in photography online equips students with the visual storytelling skills needed to raise awareness through compelling imagery.

Best Scientists Citing Martijn J. Booij

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles