World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
11278
World Ranking
4978
National Ranking
2733

Anne M. Schell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne M. Schell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anne M. Schell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne M. Schell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne M. Schell is affiliated with Occidental College in the United States. The profile available does not include details regarding specific research publications, topics, or fields of study.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Anne M. Schell in the data provided.

The record also does not contain information about book publications or awards received by this researcher.

Due to the limited data, further detailed insights into Anne M. Schell's academic contributions, research focus, or professional achievements cannot be furnished at this time.

Best Publications

  • The electrodermal system

    Michael E Dawson;Anne M Schell;Dianne L Filion

  • Startle Modification: Implications for Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Clinical Science

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell;Andreas H. Bohmelt

  • A prospective study of delinquency in 110 adolescent boys with attention deficit disorder and 88 normal adolescent boys.

    James H. Satterfield;Chistiane M. Hoppe;Anne M. Schell

  • A Prospective Study of Hyperactive Boys With Conduct Problems and Normal Boys: Adolescent and Adult Criminality

    James H. Satterfield;Anne Schell

  • The psychological significance of human startle eyeblink modification: a review.

    Diane L Filion;Michael E Dawson;Anne M Schell

  • Modification of the acoustic startle-reflex eyeblink: a tool for investigating early and late attentional processes

    Diane L. Filion;Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell

  • Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening.

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell

  • Attention and schizophrenia: impaired modulation of the startle reflex.

    Michael E. Dawson;Erin A. Hazlett;Diane L. Filion;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • A 30-Year Prospective Follow-up Study of Hyperactive Boys With Conduct Problems : Adult Criminality

    James H. Satterfield;Katherine J. Faller;Francis M. Crinella;Anne M. Schell

  • Preferential neural processing of attended stimuli in attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal boys

    James H. Satterfield;Anne M. Schell;Thomas Nicholas

  • Ontogeny of selective attention effects on event-related potentials in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal boys.

    James H. Satterfield;Anne M. Schell;Thomas W. Nicholas;Breena T. Satterfield

  • Therapeutic interventions to prevent delinquency in hyperactive boys.

    James H. Satterfield;Breena T. Satterfield;Anne M. Schell

  • Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources

    Michael E. Dawson;Diane L. Filion;Anne M. Schell

  • Modification of the Startle Reflex in a Community Sample: Do One or Two Dimensions of Psychopathy Underlie Emotional Processing?

    Eric J. Vanman;Veronica Y. Mejia;Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell

  • Short Lead Interval Startle Modification

    Terry D. Blumenthal

  • The skin conductance response, anticipation, and decision-making.

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell;Christopher G. Courtney

  • Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic classical conditioning.

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell;James R. Beers;Andrew Kelly

  • Autonomic correlates of depression and clinical improvement following electroconvulsive shock therapy.

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell;Jeffrey J. Catania

  • A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of age effects of electrophysiological measures in hyperactive and normal children.

    Satterfield Jh;Schell Am;Backs Rw;Hidaka Kc

  • Autonomic abnormalities in schizophrenia: State or trait indicators?

    Michael E. Dawson;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Anne M. Schell;Michael Gitlin

  • On the clinical and cognitive meaning of impaired sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia.

    Michael E. Dawson;Anne M. Schell;Erin A. Hazlett;Keith H. Nuechterlein

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Dawson
Michael E. Dawson University of Southern California
Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Erin A. Hazlett
Erin A. Hazlett Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jonathan K. Wynn
Jonathan K. Wynn University of California, Los Angeles
Joseph Ventura
Joseph Ventura University of California, Los Angeles
Michael F. Green
Michael F. Green University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth L. Subotnik
Kenneth L. Subotnik University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas D. Parsons
Thomas D. Parsons University of North Texas
Adrian Raine
Adrian Raine University of Pennsylvania
Laura A. Baker
Laura A. Baker University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers and related online degree programs. One popular specialization is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential highly sought after in fields such as applied behavior analysis and special education.

Each state can have specific pathways and requirements for this certification. For instance, bcba certification requirements in Atlanta highlight the need for accredited graduate programs and supervised experience. Similarly, aspiring professionals should look into how to become a bcba in Aurora to understand regional expectations for coursework, practical experience, and the BCBA exam.

Prospective students considering this pathway in Texas can review Austin bcba requirements, which emphasize local regulations and available online programs. In California, Bakersfield bcba requirements detail unique licensure steps and professional resources.

Whether you choose an online degree in psychology or a specific BCBA certification, understanding these career pathways will help you meet your goals and adapt to state requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Anne M. Schell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles