World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David L. Neumann

David L. Neumann

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9903
World Ranking
5441
National Ranking
316

David L. Neumann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Neumann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David L. Neumann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Neumann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Neumann is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and has a research portfolio spanning psychology and medicine, with a total of 66 publications in psychology and 38 in medicine.

Their research focuses on several subfields of psychology including social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

Key topics within their work include:

  • Sport psychology and performance
  • Virtual reality applications and impacts
  • Motivation and self-concept in sports
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Cultural differences and values
  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Social robot interaction and human-robot interaction (HRI)

The scientist has published frequently in several academic venues, among them:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Australian Psychologist
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology

Recent papers include:

  • "Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem" (2022, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Coping, wellbeing, and psychopathology during high-risk pregnancy: A systematic review" (2022, Midwifery)
  • "External shame and its association with depression and anxiety: the moderating role of self-compassion" (2021, Australian Psychologist)
  • "Culture, Sex, and Group-Bias in Trait and State Empathy" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "'My mind pretty much went to mush': A qualitative exploration of trenbolone in the performance and image enhancing drug community" (2023, Drug and Alcohol Review)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Timothy Piatkowski
  • Robyn L. Moffitt
  • David Shum
  • Michelle M. Neumann
  • Matthew Dunn

Best Publications

  • Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in China.

    Kui Wang;Hai-Song Shi;Fu-Lei Geng;Lai-Quan Zou

  • Touch Screen Tablets and Emergent Literacy

    Michelle Neumann;David Lester Neumann

  • Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • A systematic review of the application of interactive virtual reality to sport

    David L. Neumann;Robyn L. Moffitt;Patrick R. Thomas;Kylie Loveday

  • Systematic review methodology in higher education

    Margaret Lynn Bearman;Calvin Smith;Angela Carbone;Susan Slade

  • Sex Differences in Mathematics and Science Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress Assessments.

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances

    Rae Westbury;David Lester Neumann

  • The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues

    Frances V. O'callaghan;David L. Neumann;Liz Jones;Peter A. Creed

  • The Effects of Using a Wiki on Student Engagement and Learning of Report Writing Skills in a University Statistics Course.

    David Lester Neumann;Michelle Heather Hood

  • The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy:

    Michelle M Neumann;David L Neumann

  • A Conceptual Framework for Emergent Digital Literacy

    Michelle M. Neumann;Glenn Finger;David L. Neumann

  • Relapse of Successfully Treated Anxiety and Fear: Theoretical Issues and Recommendations for Clinical Practice:

    Mark Justin Boschen;David Lester Neumann;Allison Maree Waters

  • The use of an unpleasant sound as an unconditional stimulus in a human aversive Pavlovian conditioning procedure

    David Lester Neumann;Allison Maree Waters

  • Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review

    David Reilly;David Lester Neumann

  • Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • The Scaffolding of Emergent Literacy Skills in the Home Environment: A Case Study.

    Michelle Margaret Neumann;Michelle Heather Hood;David Lester Neumann

  • Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: Implications for STEM Education and Approaches to Reducing the Gender Gap for Parents and Educators

    David Reilly;David L. Neumann;Glenda Andrews

  • Measures of empathy: Self-report, behavioral, and neuroscientific approaches

    David. L. Neumann;Raymond C.K. Chan;Gregory. J. Boyle;Yi Wang

  • Using Real-Life Data When Teaching Statistics: Student Perceptions of this Strategy in an Introductory Statistics Course.

    David Lester Neumann;Michelle Heather Hood;Michelle Neumann

  • Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration

    Stefania Paolini;Jake Harwood;Miles Hewstone;Miles Hewstone;David L. Neumann

  • Aversive Pavlovian conditioning in childhood anxiety disorders: Impaired response inhibition and resistance to extinction

    Allison Maree Waters;Julie Henry;David Lester Neumann

Frequent Co-Authors

David Shum
David Shum Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Raymond C.K. Chan
Raymond C.K. Chan Chinese Academy of Sciences
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
Allison M. Waters
Allison M. Waters Griffith University
Ya Wang
Ya Wang Capital Normal University
Eric F.C. Cheung
Eric F.C. Cheung Castle Peak Hospital
Simon S.Y. Lui
Simon S.Y. Lui University of Hong Kong
Gregory J. Boyle
Gregory J. Boyle University of Melbourne
Glenda Andrews
Glenda Andrews Griffith University
John J. Furedy
John J. Furedy University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and professional pathways, such as social work. Each state sets unique requirements for aspiring social workers. For example, understanding the social worker degree requirements in Idaho is essential if you plan to practice there. Idaho typically requires at least a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) from an accredited program to enter the field.

Similarly, the degree needed to be a social worker in Illinois includes completing a BSW or a Master of Social Work (MSW), with the MSW being standard for clinical roles. In Indiana, you should review the social worker education requirements in Indiana, as licensing levels can depend on your degree and supervised experience.

When exploring online psychology programs, also consider the Iowa minimum degree requirement for social workers, since some online degrees allow you to meet state-specific guidelines while advancing your knowledge. Online study can offer the flexibility needed to balance work, study, and other commitments as you prepare for a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Neumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles