World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John J. Furedy

John J. Furedy

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5176
World Ranking
9861
National Ranking
679

John J. Furedy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Furedy sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 264 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John J. Furedy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Furedy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Furedy was affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada during their academic career. Their work focused primarily on research conducted within this institution.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work are available for inclusion in this profile.

Best Publications

  • Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective

    Gershon Ben-Shakhar;John J. Furedy

  • The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: the necessary-gate hypothesis.

    Michael E. Dawson;John J. Furedy

  • P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms.

    J. Peter Rosenfeld;Julianne R. Biroschak;John J. Furedy

  • Differentiation of Deception as a Psychological Process: A Psychophysiological Approach

    John J. Furedy;Caroline Davis;Maria Gurevich

  • Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception

    Unknown

  • Test of the preparatory adaptive response interpretation of aversive classical autonomic conditioning.

    John J. Furedy

  • Human orienting reaction as a function of electrodermal versus plethysmographic response modes and single versus alternating stimulus series.

    John J. Furedy

  • An integrative progress report on informational control in humans: Some laboratory findings and methodological claims

    John J. Furedy

  • The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge.

    John J. Furedy;Gershon Ben-Shakhar

  • Heart-rate decelerative Pavlovian conditioning with tilt as UCS: towards behavioural control of cardiac dysfunction.

    John J. Furedy;Constantine X. Poulos

  • Sexually dimorphic cognitive style in rats emerges after puberty.

    L Kanit;D Taskiran;Ö.A Yilmaz;B Balkan

  • Some limits on the cognitive control of conditioned autonomic behavior.

    John J. Furedy

  • Sensitivities of HR and T-wave amplitude for detecting cognitive and anticipatory stress

    Ronald J. Heslegrave;John J. Furedy

  • A consideration of recent criticisms of the T-wave amplitude index of myocardial sympathetic activity.

    John J. Furedy;Ronald J. Heslegrave

  • Contingency Theory and Classical Autonomic Excitatory and Inhibitory Conditioning: Some Problems of Assessment and Interpretation

    John J. Furedy;Constantine X. Poulos;Karl Schiffmann

  • Preference for Signaled Shock in Rats? Instrumentation and Methodological Errors in the Archival Literature

    Gerald B. Biederman;John J. Furedy

  • Concurrent measurement of autonomic and cognitive processes in a test of the traditional discriminative control procedure for Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning.

    John J. Furedy;Karl Schiffman

  • Measuring Baseline-Treatment Differences in Heart Rate Variability: Variance Versus Successive Difference Mean Square and Beats Per Minute Versus Interbeat Intervals

    Ronald J. Heslegrave;John C. Ogilvie;John J. Furedy

  • A realist perspective.

    John J. Furedy

  • Pavlovian extinction, phobias, and the limits of the cognitive paradigm.

    John J. Furedy;Diane M. Riley;Mats Fredrikson

  • The human dive reflex: an experimental, topographical and physiological analysis.

    Barry E. Hurwitz;John J. Furedy

  • Electrodermal differentiation of deception: Perceived accuracy and perceived memorial content manipulations

    John J. Furedy;Ruth T. Posner;Alex Vincent

  • Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.

    John J. Furedy;Francesca Gigliotti;Gershon Ben-Shakhar

Frequent Co-Authors

Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Gershon Ben-Shakhar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David L. Neumann
David L. Neumann Griffith University
Gregory J. Boyle
Gregory J. Boyle University of Melbourne
Robert J. McDonald
Robert J. McDonald University of Lethbridge
Larry E. Roberts
Larry E. Roberts McMaster University
Attila Szabo
Attila Szabo Eötvös Loránd University
Benjamin H. Natelson
Benjamin H. Natelson Mount Sinai Health System
Michael E. Dawson
Michael E. Dawson University of Southern California
J. Richard Jennings
J. Richard Jennings University of Pittsburgh
Alison S. Fleming
Alison S. Fleming University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to numerous career pathways, especially in the growing mental health sector. Online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students seeking to balance studies with other commitments. These degrees can lead to rewarding roles such as mental health counselors, clinical therapists, or school counselors.

Each state and city may have specific education and licensing requirements. For example, those interested in how to become a mental health counselor in St. Petersburg or become a mental health counselor in Tampa must meet Florida’s local standards. Similarly, Stockton mental health counselor education requirements and Toledo mental health counselor education requirements focus on their respective state guidelines.

Choosing an online psychology or counseling program helps you learn the latest in behavioral science while meeting regional requirements for certification and licensure. Whether you hope to work in a clinic, community center, or private practice, researching these prerequisites ensures you stay on track for your desired career.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Furedy

Recently Published Articles